Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Mighty Magpie's Offseason Trade and List Management Blog

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 113, 114, 115 ... 126, 127, 128  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
glasseyevfx 



Joined: 01 Jul 2017
Location: Gold Coast

PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 9:58 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd like to see a collingwood policy where we rookie in the best player our vfl team has to offer each year. It might be quite a group / team building practice that would push the vfl squad along and develop individuals with reward for effort (make better players)

then again there's a reason I'm not a recruiter

_________________
We shall set our course by the stars and not ships that pass in the night
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
watt price tully Scorpio



Joined: 15 May 2007


PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 10:13 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

glasseyevfx wrote:
I'd like to see a collingwood policy where we rookie in the best player our vfl team has to offer each year. It might be quite a group / team building practice that would push the vfl squad along and develop individuals with reward for effort (make better players)

then again there's a reason I'm not a recruiter


I like it: getting back to the idea of a first, second and thirds teams

_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
melliot 



Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Location: Bendigo

PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 10:39 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Not sure about the Hugh Goddard idea. Was thinking about it this morning, when reading about delistings. Was reasonably regarded in TAC level.

May need a fresh start. May need better development. Big guys take time to mature. Has been injured a bit. So hasn't had a good run at it.

Would be interested in opinions on his form from any VFL observers

We need KPP. Could be a good Rookie punt.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
melliot 



Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Location: Bendigo

PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 10:42 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/revealed-blues-secret-meeting-to-lure-key-position-exsaint-hugh-goddard/news-story/6e11c754d60f108189c9566174ff5fce



Quote:
Goddards form for Sandringham has remained strong this year, which led to him being recalled against Hawthorn in Round 22 and playing his only senior game for the season.

After averaging 10 disposals per game across his first 11 matches in the VFL, he averaged 19 per outing in his last six matches. He was also the leading intercept marker for the Zebras in 2018.


St Kilda insiders say his foot injuries since being drafted at the end of 2014 have significantly hampered his continuity, while a source with close connections at the club said Goddard has been just one of several players to have plateaued due to sub-par development coaching that is now being rectified.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 10:48 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Last year (pre-Guy), Cal Twomey mentioned the main guys we know about and then wrote: "Adam Shepard is a national recruiting officer, and the Pies have part-time managers in all states, and about 15 scouts who report to them from around the country. The Pies call on some consultants in terms of the organisation of data, but are relatively thin in the core team."
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
E 



Joined: 05 May 2010


PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 12:00 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Beams will become more valuable once Treloars hammie goe twang.

Or said better. Having Beams means we can rest players more easily so that they become less likely to suffer fatigue injuries. Might enable a Varcoe to get to September absolutely cherry ripe!

Might allow kids like Sier and Stevo the chance to have the odd week off here and there.

People think we dont need midfield depth are forgetting the there was a time last year where we barely had a best 22. There were weeks when every fit player was named (other than McLarty)

_________________
Ohhh, the Premiership's a cakewalk .......
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies2016 



Joined: 12 Sep 2014


PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 1:23 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

M M
I read this morning that the Cats are about to officially register Oscar Brownless as a an F S nomination. The deadline for these nominations is 31st Oct according to the AFL article.
This suggests that F S nominations ( and presumably NGA prospects ) do have to be officially flagged by any affiliated club.
The point being, Im assuming no one on here has yet heard of Collingwood nominating either Quaynor, Kelly or Atu B ??
I dont see any issue at all other than everyone on here assumes Q and K will be part of our strategy. It might be that we all keep one eye on 31st Oct just to at least confirm what we all think as very likely.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
MatthewBoydFanClub 



Joined: 12 Feb 2007
Location: Elwood

PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 3:42 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Pies2016 wrote:
M M
I read this morning that the Cats are about to officially register Oscar Brownless as a an F S nomination. The deadline for these nominations is 31st Oct according to the AFL article.
This suggests that F S nominations ( and presumably NGA prospects ) do have to be officially flagged by any affiliated club.
The point being, Im assuming no one on here has yet heard of Collingwood nominating either Quaynor, Kelly or Atu B ??
I dont see any issue at all other than everyone on here assumes Q and K will be part of our strategy. It might be that we all keep one eye on 31st Oct just to at least confirm what we all think as very likely.

Given the number of third and fourth round draft picks we have stored, as well as what we gave up for Beams, I would be staggered if that wasn't our strategy. Just a formality before Q and K are named.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies2016 



Joined: 12 Sep 2014


PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:04 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

^^^

I think the interest in the above is more about if we hear them officially nominate Q and K but not Atu B, then we begin to get a slightly clearer picture of the clubs thinking.
Same applies if Atu B is also nominated, that too would declare our intentions at the draft ( unless of course one of them is called out way earlier than the club expects )
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Dave The Man Scorpio



Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia

PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 4:50 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

RudeBoy wrote:
I was disappointed we didn't land Lynch or May, the latter apparently being one we had been courting for a couple of years. I think the club may have been wrong footed by Moore, thinking he'd leave for Sydney. Once Darcy, and to a lesser extent Langdon, decided to stay with us, we clearly had no salary space or indeed draft picks to get Lynch or May. Once that was clear, getting Beams was our next best option, and to that end we were successful. Overall, I'd give our club 6.5 or 7/10 for their trading efforts.

and Being Committed to Beams we did not have the Currency to get May

_________________
I am Da Man
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Warnings : 1 
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 7:26 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

The question is: Is Ned good at Scrabble?
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
RudeBoy 



Joined: 28 Nov 2005


PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 7:39 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Dave The Man wrote:
RudeBoy wrote:
I was disappointed we didn't land Lynch or May, the latter apparently being one we had been courting for a couple of years. I think the club may have been wrong footed by Moore, thinking he'd leave for Sydney. Once Darcy, and to a lesser extent Langdon, decided to stay with us, we clearly had no salary space or indeed draft picks to get Lynch or May. Once that was clear, getting Beams was our next best option, and to that end we were successful. Overall, I'd give our club 6.5 or 7/10 for their trading efforts.

and Being Committed to Beams we did not have the Currency to get May


I think it may have been the other way around. Not able to get May, we then decided to recruit Beams.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
stui magpie Gemini

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.


Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto

PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2018 7:45 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

watt price tully wrote:
glasseyevfx wrote:
I'd like to see a collingwood policy where we rookie in the best player our vfl team has to offer each year. It might be quite a group / team building practice that would push the vfl squad along and develop individuals with reward for effort (make better players)

then again there's a reason I'm not a recruiter


I like it: getting back to the idea of a first, second and thirds teams


I don't. Being best player at VFL level doesn't mean you fit list needs or have what it takes to play AFL.

_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Albert Parker 



Joined: 13 Dec 2012


PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2018 2:58 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

My presumption is Rudey is right. We turned off May once it was apparent that he would get to Melbourne courtesy of the Hogan trade. May himself seems to have made that choice for practical reasons. I believe he wanted in at Collingwood and the Age podcast suggests that to be the case.
Beams, was a late option and improves our Best 22 and Roughead improves our depth for little cost. Solid enough trade period and hopefully, with a bit of luck, we don't have to go too far into deficit to secure Quaynor and Kelly.

_________________
One team, one dream - the Pies and this year's premiership
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
inxs88 



Joined: 17 Aug 2014


PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:18 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Albert Parker wrote:
My presumption is Rudey is right. We turned off May once it was apparent that he would get to Melbourne courtesy of the Hogan trade. May himself seems to have made that choice for practical reasons. I believe he wanted in at Collingwood and the Age podcast suggests that to be the case.
Beams, was a late option and improves our Best 22 and Roughead improves our depth for little cost. Solid enough trade period and hopefully, with a bit of luck, we don't have to go too far into deficit to secure Quaynor and Kelly.


Better value for money (so to speak) pursuing Beams vs May, albeit positionally a tad silly.

_________________
I love the Pies, hate Carlscum
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 113, 114, 115 ... 126, 127, 128  Next
Page 114 of 128   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group