View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
BlackAndWhiteSince87
Joined: 26 Nov 2008
|
Post subject: | |
|
Cant remember back to Round 1
Round 2:
3.Pendlebury
2.Shaw
1.Cloke |
|
|
|
|
Neil Appleby
Joined: 11 Feb 1998 Location: Melbourne
|
Post subject: | |
|
3 Lockyer
2 Didak
1 Pendlebury
3 Pendlebury
2 O'Brien
1 Cloke _________________ After the epic draw comes the decisive knockout!
Collingwood rules the world again and Mick Malthouse fulfils his destiny with the twenty ten premiership and can you hear the people sing! |
|
|
|
|
magpie1946
Joined: 29 May 2007 Location: CAN-BRA
|
Post subject: | |
|
woftam wrote: | Round One vs WCE:
3. S.Pendlebury
2.B.Johnson
1. T.Lockyer
Round 2 vs tigers
3. A.Toovey
2. M.Clarke
1. H.Shaw |
Geez ... I was just about to comment when I saw that you had given HS 1 vote that Toovs was ten times more effective ... pays to open your eyes and not your mouth (or keyboard in this case). Still don't think HS deserved a vote! _________________ I'm a big dog (two dogs) on a big hunt and I don't have time for a piss-ant on a melon stalk."
STOKE THE STOVE COLLINGWOOD |
|
|
|
|
woftam
I used to be undecided, but now I'm not so sure.
Joined: 28 Jul 2008 Location: Carum Downs, Vic
|
Post subject: | |
|
magpie1946 wrote: | woftam wrote: | Round One vs WCE:
3. S.Pendlebury
2.B.Johnson
1. T.Lockyer
Round 2 vs tigers
3. A.Toovey
2. M.Clarke
1. H.Shaw |
Geez ... I was just about to comment when I saw that you had given HS 1 vote that Toovs was ten times more effective ... pays to open your eyes and not your mouth (or keyboard in this case). Still don't think HS deserved a vote! |
Hehe As you can tell by my votes, I thought our backline worked pretty well. |
|
|
|
|
|