View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
5. Sidebottom
4. Cloke
3. Keeffe
2. Maxwell
1. Swan |
|
|
|
|
MagpieBat
Joined: 27 Nov 2010 Location: Brooding in a cave... somewhere... maybe...
|
Post subject: | |
|
5. Swan
4. O'Brien
3. Pendlebury
2. Keefe
1. Sidebottm _________________ I am vengeance. I am the night. I am MagpieBat. |
|
|
|
|
Neil Appleby
Joined: 11 Feb 1998 Location: Melbourne
|
Post subject: | |
|
5. Sidebottom
4. Goldsack
3. Pendlebury
2. Cloke
1. Harry _________________ After the epic draw comes the decisive knockout!
Collingwood rules the world again and Mick Malthouse fulfils his destiny with the twenty ten premiership and can you hear the people sing!
Last edited by Neil Appleby on Sat Apr 21, 2012 8:28 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
|
John Wren
"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."
Joined: 15 Jul 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
5. keeffe
4. cloke
3. swan
2. sidebottom
1. pendlebury _________________ Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle. |
|
|
|
|
John Wren
"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."
Joined: 15 Jul 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
david - i was going to reference a comment (which has disappeared) you made in response to donny's questioning of someone putting keeffe ahead of swan.
i think it would be interesting if voters could append their votes with the location of how they watched the game, i.e. tv, bay 33 row d etc. this would give context to their decision making.
i find when i watch from an elevated view i am focusing on the next two kicks ahead of the play rather than the play itself. sitting on ground level is difficult to see the other end and the tv only really shows you who has (or is near) the ball. _________________ Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle. |
|
|
|
|
Donny
Formerly known as MAGFAN8.
Joined: 04 Aug 2002 Location: Toonumbar NSW Australia
|
Post subject: | |
|
Valid comment, JW, and a good idea.
Although, there are a plethora of stats and opinions which a Nick's member can access before voting if, for example, they went to the game and, by the nature of where they might have been seated, only really saw that part of the ground/play.
(I deleted my original comment about Keeffe v. Swan as it went against the voting guidelines. I also deleted David's comments for the same reason.) _________________ Donny.
It's a game. Enjoy it. |
|
|
|
|
Black_White
Joined: 19 Mar 2001
|
Post subject: | |
|
John Wren wrote: | david - i was going to reference a comment (which has disappeared) you made in response to donny's questioning of someone putting keeffe ahead of swan.
i think it would be interesting if voters could append their votes with the location of how they watched the game, i.e. tv, bay 33 row d etc. this would give context to their decision making.
i find when i watch from an elevated view i am focusing on the next two kicks ahead of the play rather than the play itself. sitting on ground level is difficult to see the other end and the tv only really shows you who has (or is near) the ball. |
What a load of crap.
So a Nicks member, who we must remember "are all equal", is subject to some kind of moral loading because he/she viewed the game from the Northern Territory?
Stupid, decisive idea. Shocked that a mod is supporting it. |
|
|
|
|
Jezza
2023 PREMIERS!
Joined: 06 Sep 2010 Location: Ponsford End
|
Post subject: | |
|
5. Swan
4. Sidebottom
3. Keefe
2. Cloke
1. Pendlebury _________________ | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | |
|
|
|
|
Donny
Formerly known as MAGFAN8.
Joined: 04 Aug 2002 Location: Toonumbar NSW Australia
|
Post subject: | |
|
Black_White wrote: | John Wren wrote: | david - i was going to reference a comment (which has disappeared) you made in response to donny's questioning of someone putting keeffe ahead of swan.
i think it would be interesting if voters could append their votes with the location of how they watched the game, i.e. tv, bay 33 row d etc. this would give context to their decision making.
i find when i watch from an elevated view i am focusing on the next two kicks ahead of the play rather than the play itself. sitting on ground level is difficult to see the other end and the tv only really shows you who has (or is near) the ball. |
What a load of crap.
So a Nicks member, who we must remember "are all equal", is subject to some kind of moral loading because he/she viewed the game from the Northern Territory?
Stupid, decisive idea. Shocked that a mod is supporting it. |
Unless that's an attempted pisstake, B_W, it is you displaying the stupidity.
JW was alluding to experiencing the game in different ways - radio, TV, at the game etc. - not in different states. _________________ Donny.
It's a game. Enjoy it. |
|
|
|
|
Piethagoras' Theorem
the hypotenuse, is always a cakewalk
Joined: 29 May 2006
|
Post subject: | |
|
5 Swan
4 Sidebottom
3 Cloke
2 Keeffe
1 Goldsack _________________ Formally frankiboy and FrankieGoesToCollingwood. |
|
|
|
|
AN_Inkling
Joined: 06 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
5. Swan
4. Sidebottom
3. Pendlebury
2. Cloke
1. O'Brien _________________ Well done boys! |
|
|
|
|
daics aka the ruckman
Joined: 30 Aug 2010 Location: Scoreboard Hill @ Vic Park
|
Post subject: | |
|
5. Keeffe
4. Sidebottom
3. Cloke
2. Pendlebury
1. Goldsack _________________ go pies |
|
|
|
|
mattmc33
Joined: 23 May 2008 Location: Sydney
|
Post subject: | |
|
5. Swan
4. Pendlebury
3. Sidebottom
2. Cloke
1. Keeffe _________________ I, for one, welcome our new black and white overlords |
|
|
|
|
Doc63
Joined: 06 May 2004 Location: Newport
|
Post subject: | |
|
5. Swan
4. Pendles
3. Keeffe
2. Beams
1. Cloke _________________ I hold a cup of wisdom, but there is nothing within. |
|
|
|
|
1eyedpie
Joined: 10 Mar 2005 Location: Melbourne
|
Post subject: | |
|
5. Pendles
4. Sidebottom
3. Swan
2. Keefe
1. Cloke _________________ Never disperse your focus unless absolutely necessary. Face one adversary at a time!
BARRACK HARD! |
|
|
|
|
|