View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Piethagoras' Theorem
the hypotenuse, is always a cakewalk
Joined: 29 May 2006
|
Post subject: Our 3 Most Important Players | |
|
who I believe, if they fire, will go along way towards our Premiership hopes. Yes, we need everyone to fire but these 3 guys imo, hold the key.
In no particular order
Jolly, Cloke and Pendlebury
Who do you think? _________________ Formally frankiboy and FrankieGoesToCollingwood. |
|
|
|
|
3rd degree
Joined: 22 Jun 2004 Location: John Wren's tote
|
Post subject: | |
|
Jolly
Cloke
Beams ahead of Pendles on present form.
2010 it was definitely Corrie. _________________ " Ohhh Banksy and out comes the Note Book".
www.facebook/the hybernators |
|
|
|
|
Tannin
Can't remember
Joined: 06 Aug 2006 Location: Huon Valley Tasmania
|
Post subject: | |
|
Cloke, Blair, Didak
Cloke is obvious
Blair because, when in form, Blair gives us the in-and-under drive out of stoppages that we otherwise do not have without Luke Ball. He's been looking very tired lately. I trust that the week off will do the trick.
Didak because I am not a Didak fan these days. Dids doesn't get a lot of the ball and lacks pace. But if Didak can put in a coupe of ripper games in his old style and pick up 20+ possies, his disposal is so deadly that we will win in a canter.
Taken for granted: Beams, Swan, Pendlebury. The first two should be safe enough bets, but Pendles is a worry.
Taken on trust: Sidebottom & Thomas. Both are noted finals performers. Both have been in poor form. I'm trusting that they will both lift. _________________ �Let's eat Grandma.� Commas save lives! |
|
|
|
|
rand corp
Joined: 06 Feb 2003 Location: south east asia
|
Post subject: | |
|
The obvious is you need everybody playing well, contributing and performing their role to win the flag.
We certainly need our gun midfield to be at the top of their game and in that regard, Pendles needs to lift, rumored to be playing with a back injury at the moment.
Defense has looked shaky all year compared to last couple of seasons and we need the boys to lock it up down there. All of the back six (or seven) will need to play as a solid unit.
Jolly in the ruck is mightily important, we are just a significantly better side when he is out there and playing well.
Forward line obviously needs Cloke at his best but would also need Krakour and Didak up and about and kicking goals along with Fasolo continuing his rich run of form. |
|
|
|
|
mgh3536
Joined: 06 Feb 2003 Location: Melbourne
|
Post subject: | |
|
i reckon its the next tier of players that will make the difference...
Thomas, Wellingham, Sidebottom, Reid.....i reckon these guys have been off a bit lately, they lift and play at peak will give us such a lift
Plus game time into Dids, BJ and Krak plus tarrant being settled into defensive role
An optimum/positive output from these 8 players will make significant impact |
|
|
|
|
What'sinaname
Joined: 29 May 2010 Location: Living rent free
|
Post subject: | |
|
Our bottom 3 players.
We need all 22 to contribute for us to win. No passengers and we will win. _________________ Fighting against the objectification of woman. |
|
|
|
|
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
It would be nice if our bottom 3 players. |
|
|
|
|
BBHS
bbhs
Joined: 30 Jun 2004 Location: Bellarine
|
Post subject: | |
|
Cloke Jolly and Reid. We have enough depth in the middle to cover |
|
|
|
|
Piesnchess
piesnchess
Joined: 09 Jun 2008
|
Post subject: | |
|
Mckenna, Coventry and Collier.
Oh whoops, wrong type of thread, silly me !
Jolly, Beams, Cloke. _________________ Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.
Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb. |
|
|
|
|
What'sinaname
Joined: 29 May 2010 Location: Living rent free
|
Post subject: | |
|
Piesnchess wrote: | Mckenna, Coventry and Collier.
Oh whoops, wrong type of thread, silly me !
Jolly, Beams, Cloke. |
Don't worry, E will surely start one soon enough to accommodate every conceivable answer. _________________ Fighting against the objectification of woman. |
|
|
|
|
magpieazza
magpieazza
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Location: Griffith N.S.W
|
Post subject: | |
|
Its a good question but you would have to say if Dawes, Jolly and Pendlebury fire its gonna be a beauty, but I also had Didak, Jolly, Cloke, Blair, Maxwell, Shaw and Fasolo as candidates.
Thats not taking into account Swan, Wellingham, O'Brien, Brown, Reid etc etc.
Come to think of it what if Krakouer, Johnno and Sidebottom fire up!!
Ok I reckon if Cloke, Krakouer and Johnno fire it will give us a real sniff.
Geez we got some good players and I haven't mentioned Beams and Thomas!!
Are the media underselling us or what!!
It probably underlines the importance of a decent second ruckman because that is where we are getting little return.
I watched Vardy play and then compared him to Wood and yeah you know the rest. Vardy looked imposing and sure and Geelong are c**ts for having him!!
Surely we will go all out to get two decent ruckmen who can play forward, not one but two because what if Jolly goes down, bang we are back to where we started from.
So the final answer is Dawes, Jolly and Cloke. Lock it in Eddie _________________ Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero. |
|
|
|
|
perthmagpie
Joined: 27 Mar 2004 Location: Yarrawonga
|
Post subject: | |
|
Thomas, Cloke, Didak/Krak. Our forward line is dysfunctional. These guys have the talent to be the match winners and do the amazing. Without them firing we are not dangerous enough. _________________ Magpies love pies(Lol) |
|
|
|
|
ClokingDevice
Joined: 14 May 2012
|
Post subject: Re: Our 3 Most Important Players | |
|
frankiboy wrote: | who I believe, if they fire, will go along way towards our Premiership hopes. Yes, we need everyone to fire but these 3 guys imo, hold the key.
In no particular order
Jolly, Cloke and Pendlebury
Who do you think? |
That's the 3 but there are stars everywhere else.. Beams Swan Thomas Shaw
So why do we look so ordinary? _________________ We will feast on their bones |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
Jolly
Jolly
Jolly |
|
|
|
|
pietillidie
Joined: 07 Jan 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
Tannin wrote: | Cloke, Blair, Didak
Cloke is obvious
Blair because, when in form, Blair gives us the in-and-under drive out of stoppages that we otherwise do not have without Luke Ball. He's been looking very tired lately. I trust that the week off will do the trick.
Didak because I am not a Didak fan these days. Dids doesn't get a lot of the ball and lacks pace. But if Didak can put in a coupe of ripper games in his old style and pick up 20+ possies, his disposal is so deadly that we will win in a canter.
Taken for granted: Beams, Swan, Pendlebury. The first two should be safe enough bets, but Pendles is a worry.
Taken on trust: Sidebottom & Thomas. Both are noted finals performers. Both have been in poor form. I'm trusting that they will both lift. |
Top post.
Would love to be mentioning Reidy's name in any of those categories, but not so for various reasons. But a dominant finals series from him would be a huge plus.
I felt Pendles looked to be moving better over the last two games. _________________ In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm |
|
|
|
|
|