| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Monco Matt 
Do it to THEM before THEY do it to YOU
Joined: 28 Apr 2009
Location: Sittin, Drinkin, Reloadin & Waitin
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
5. Pendles
4. Thomas
3. Williams
2. Sidey
1. Broomhead
_________________
RED "BABY" CAVANAUGH: Didn't hear what the bet was.
MONCO: Your life. |
|
|
|
 |
Stinger
Joined: 01 Dec 2003
Location: Canberra
|
| Post subject: | |
|
5-Williams
4-Thomas
3-Sidey
2-pendles
1-blair |
|
|
|
|
rand corp
Joined: 06 Feb 2003
Location: south east asia
|
| Post subject: | |
|
5: Thomas
4: Broomhead
3: Pendlebury
2: Williams
1: Frost |
|
|
|
|
Damien 
Me Noah & Flynn @ the G
Joined: 21 Jan 1999
Location: Croydon Vic
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Monco Matt wrote: | 5. Pendles
4. Thomas
3. Williams
2. Sidey
1. Broomhead |
Ditto
_________________
'Collingwood are the Bradmans of Football'
The Herald - 1930 |
|
|
|
|
Piesnchess
piesnchess
Joined: 09 Jun 2008
|
| Post subject: | |
|
5: Thomas
4: Broomhead
3: Pendlebury
2: Williams
1: Frost
_________________
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.
Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb. |
|
|
|
|
Wokko 
Come and take it.
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
|
| Post subject: | |
|
5. Thomas
4. Pendlebury
3. Broomhead
2. Sidebottom
1. Blair |
|
|
|
|
Tannin 
Can't remember
Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Location: Huon Valley Tasmania
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Donny wrote: | What's so difficult to understand about "Votes only, please"
I've had to edit 8 of 11 posts in this thread.
Please put comments in the Post Match thread. |
It's not difficult to understand, it's difficult to comply with, 'coz it goes against the whole concept of weighing up players' contribution to the game to ban discussion and consideration. Who brought in the dumb "votes only" rule in the first place? It has wrecked what used to be an enjoyable and interesting thread every week. For proof, look at the piss-poor numbers - lots of members don't even bother to post in this thread anymore 'coz it has become boring and practically meaningless. The fact that you "had to" edit nearly 80 percent of the posts here demonstrates conclusively that the problem isn't the posters or the posts, it's the rule that is wrong.
_________________
�Let's eat Grandma.� Commas save lives! |
|
|
|
|
AN_Inkling
Joined: 06 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
5. Pendlebury
4. Thomas
3. Williams
2. Sidebottom
1. Broomhead
_________________
Well done boys! |
|
|
|
|
The Boy Who Cried Wolf
Joined: 26 Sep 2013
Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right
|
| Post subject: | |
|
5. Pendlebury
4. Thomas
3. Williams
2. Sidebottom
1. Broomhead
_________________
All Aboard!! Choo Choo!!! |
|
|
|
|
King Malta 
RIP Flip
Joined: 24 Mar 2008
Location: Gettin' Wiggy
|
| Post subject: | |
|
5.Thomas
4.Blair
3.Pendles
2.Sinclair
1.Sidebottom |
|
|
|
|
stoliboy 
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Location: Sydney, NSW
|
|
|
|
|
Donny
Formerly known as MAGFAN8.
Joined: 04 Aug 2002
Location: Toonumbar NSW Australia
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Tannin wrote: | | Donny wrote: | What's so difficult to understand about "Votes only, please"
I've had to edit 8 of 11 posts in this thread.
Please put comments in the Post Match thread. |
It's not difficult to understand, it's difficult to comply with, 'coz it goes against the whole concept of weighing up players' contribution to the game to ban discussion and consideration. Who brought in the dumb "votes only" rule in the first place? It has wrecked what used to be an enjoyable and interesting thread every week. For proof, look at the piss-poor numbers - lots of members don't even bother to post in this thread anymore 'coz it has become boring and practically meaningless. The fact that you "had to" edit nearly 80 percent of the posts here demonstrates conclusively that the problem isn't the posters or the posts, it's the rule that is wrong. |
You totally miss the point, mate. It's simply for the compiler that we ask for votes only.
You're also wrong about it being an "enjoyable and interesting thread every week", because of comments/discussion, or being meant to be that. Never was. Check the history.
Submit comments on who played well or not in the Post Match thread.
_________________
Donny.
It's a game. Enjoy it.  |
|
|
|
|
King Monkey
Joined: 15 Apr 2009
Location: On a journey to seek the scriptures of enlightenment....
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Donny wrote: | What's so difficult to understand about "Votes only, please"
I've had to edit 8 of 11 posts in this thread.
Please put comments in the Post Match thread. |
A quick one-liner to clarify a vote, or to acknowledge a player who's just missed out - hardly makes the job of the compiler difficult 
C'mon Donny, fair dinkum........
Fair enough stopping people posting essays in the votes thread, but I think most people get that anyway mate.
_________________
"I am a great sage, equal of heaven.
Grow stick, grow.
Fly cloud, fly.
Oh you are a dee-mon, I love to fiiight." |
|
|
|
|
MJ23
Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Location: Sydney
|
| Post subject: | |
|
5. Pendleberry
4. Thomas
3. Sidey
2. Blair
1. Broomhead.
_________________
"Even when Im old and gray, I wont be able to play but Ill still love the game"
Michael Jordan |
|
|
|
|
Guts42
Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Location: M32
|
| Post subject: | |
|
5.thomas
4.pendles
3.broomy
2.blair
1. Williams |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
