View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
Post subject: Big forwards: 3 into 2 won't go! | |
|
When Darcy is fit and ready to return, it seems (according to Bucks himself) that he's more likely to play up forward, than as a defender, given the settled and good form of our current back 6.
So potentially we could have Moore, Reid and Cox available as key forwards, to fill only 2 spots.
In that eventuality, I'd like to see Moore come in to replace Reid, as I think Cox and Moore offer our best key forwards combination. Any thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
foreigner
Joined: 10 May 2004 Location: Brisbane, QLD
|
Post subject: | |
|
This is assuming a best case scenario when either both or one of Moore and Reid are not in the sidelines nursing injuries - which is the more probable scenario. _________________ Pies Forever |
|
|
|
|
Pies2016
Joined: 12 Sep 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
Only one can hold his own in the ruck, so there’s half your answer.
Given the fragility of Reid and Moore, I reckon we have more chance of McLarty debuting before we ever have the luxury of choosing any two of the first three. |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005 Location: In flagrante delicto
|
Post subject: | |
|
If we discard the notion of set positions, there's no reason why all 3 can't play.
Cox and Reid as deep but wide forwards, with Moore using his athleticism to play high half forward / wing, provide the link up between half back and half forward.
Reid goes off for a spell, Moore can go deep. He's athletic and versatile, so sue his strengths. _________________ Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
Woods
Joined: 21 Aug 2013 Location: Melbourne
|
Post subject: | |
|
All three can also play if (as Buckley said in the same interview) Grundy plays as a midfielder. This would leave the ruck to be shared with, say, Cox and Moore, leaving Reid to play forward. |
|
|
|
|
MatthewBoydFanClub
Joined: 12 Feb 2007 Location: Elwood
|
Post subject: | |
|
I didn't hear the interview but as stated above I think Buckley is playing games with his audience. We play sling shot football with the opposition with our only nominal positions full back (Dunn) and ruck (Grundy). Every other team member apart from the lucky ones who rotate out of the centre share periods behind the ball and in front of the ball. So talking about Moore's favourite position or Reid's favourite position is really not serving the team's best interest. |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
Longer term, Moore may well replace Dunn as a key defender, especially if we land Tom Lynch to partner with Cox up forward.
But this year, I reckon Moore could well force Reid out of the side. |
|
|
|
|
BHPIE
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Location: Broken Hill
|
Post subject: | |
|
Reid to return down back in place of Langdon |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
BHPIE wrote: | Reid to return down back in place of Langdon |
I prefer Langdon. |
|
|
|
|
Pebbles Rocks
Joined: 28 Sep 2008 Location: Collingwood
|
Post subject: | |
|
RudeBoy wrote: | BHPIE wrote: | Reid to return down back in place of Langdon |
I prefer Langdon. |
so do i _________________ "You must be a parking ticket, cuz you got fine written all over you" Glen Quagmire |
|
|
|
|
E
Joined: 05 May 2010
|
Post subject: | |
|
yes, its also going to be difficult to fit Elliot, Fazolo, Stephenson, De Goey, WHE, Broomhead and Crocker in one forward line.
Maybe we should discuss more realistic issues. _________________ Ohhh, the Premiership's a cakewalk ....... |
|
|
|
|
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
I'm not sure if I am ready for that yet. |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
E wrote: | yes, its also going to be difficult to fit Elliot, Fazolo, Stephenson, De Goey, WHE, Broomhead and Crocker in one forward line.
Maybe we should discuss more realistic issues. |
Realistically, Fasolo, Broomhead and Crocker are not in our best 22. |
|
|
|
|
E
Joined: 05 May 2010
|
Post subject: | |
|
RudeBoy wrote: | E wrote: | yes, its also going to be difficult to fit Elliot, Fazolo, Stephenson, De Goey, WHE, Broomhead and Crocker in one forward line.
Maybe we should discuss more realistic issues. |
Realistically, Fasolo, Broomhead and Crocker are not in our best 22. |
Yes i know Rudey. I was more observing on the fact that usually we are lucky to have two of the three healthy. Lets worry about which of these 3 are in our best 22 IF we ever get that luxury (which is highly unlikely).
Right now its whichever of the three are healthy enough to play..... _________________ Ohhh, the Premiership's a cakewalk ....... |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
E wrote: | RudeBoy wrote: | E wrote: | yes, its also going to be difficult to fit Elliot, Fazolo, Stephenson, De Goey, WHE, Broomhead and Crocker in one forward line.
Maybe we should discuss more realistic issues. |
Realistically, Fasolo, Broomhead and Crocker are not in our best 22. |
Yes i know Rudey. I was more observing on the fact that usually we are lucky to have two of the three healthy. Lets worry about which of these 3 are in our best 22 IF we ever get that luxury (which is highly unlikely).
Right now its whichever of the three are healthy enough to play..... |
Fair point. |
|
|
|
|
|