| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
MightyMagpie
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Location: WA
|
|
|
|
 |
E
Joined: 05 May 2010
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
| MightyMagpie wrote: | http://www.espn.com.au/afl/story/_/id/25074968/afl-draft-phantom-chris-doerre-knightmare-first-two-rounds
Quaynor 10-20
Kelly 20-40 |
Boy, that's going out on a limb!
Do we think these guys will go higher or lower than they normally might have because we got rid of all our early picks? or do you think it makes no difference. i think they'll go lower. People just wont feel the need to harm us. Although another way to look at it is that they might go higher. let's day Quaynor goes at 10. Our choice is picking Quaynor at 10 or waiting for pick 39! The only cost to us is points, which doesn't cost us players. we'd probably even take Quaynor higher than that? Big risk by the club trying to screw us.
you can see the game theory has me very intrigued, but i dont quite know which way it will go.
_________________
Ohhh, the Premiership's a cakewalk ....... |
|
|
|
|
melliot
Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Location: Bendigo
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| ^ I was thinking the same. A club could pick Q early just to make us pay more. Because we've offloaded early picks and banking on getting Q, we now have to take him. We really have no alternative to bring in a quality kid.. |
|
|
|
|
thesoretoothsayer
Joined: 26 Apr 2017
|
| Post subject: | |
|
These people deal with each other every trade period.
Why would someone screw over the Pies knowing that in 2019 they may need to do a deal with us? |
|
|
|
|
BazBoy
Joined: 11 Sep 2014
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Yep quality two years in a row eh!!!!
Stevo now Quaynor
_________________
I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right |
|
|
|
|
LaurieHolden 
Floreat Gymnorhina tyrannica
Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Location: Victoria Park
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| thesoretoothsayer wrote: | These people deal with each other every trade period.
Why would someone screw over the Pies knowing that in 2019 they may need to do a deal with us? |
NB 2014 draft. Collingwood secured Moore with pick 8, matching the Western Bulldogs' bid of pick 5.
_________________
"The Club's not Jock, Ted and Gerry" (& Eddie)
2023 AFL Premiers |
|
|
|
|
K
Joined: 09 Sep 2011
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| ^ The Dogs really wanted him. (This was prior to their bold poaching of Boyd.) |
|
|
|
|
Hm 
Joined: 20 May 2007
|
|
|
|
|
robevpau1 
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
|
| Post subject: | |
|
SEN 1116
BREAKING: Geelong has traded picks 59 and 60 to Collingwood for pick 51. |
|
|
|
|
BazBoy
Joined: 11 Sep 2014
|
| Post subject: | |
|
A very interesting and hopefully good outcome for us�the Quaynor boy looks
OK and Will Kelly too
Bucks said �We are not done�
�We are enough �
Didn�t hit the KPP of Lynch/May but still see our current recruiting process
a good one
_________________
I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right |
|
|
|
|
watt price tully 
Joined: 15 May 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
^^ I want to know if Hm & robevpau1 are the same person.
They posted the same information (albeit in diferent ways) at exactly 2.29 pm.
Have they ever been seen together in the same place at the same time?
No I thought not 
_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman |
|
|
|
|
watt price tully
Joined: 15 May 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
If someone makes a really high bid lets say pick 5 for example for Quaynor do we then have to fork out the points value of pick 5?
If we allow the nominating team to take Quaynor does this then have any impact on our draft selection (which I suspect it doesn't) or is our first pick then that which we are already allocated (forgetting about Kelly for the moment)?
_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman |
|
|
|
|
MJ23
Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Location: Sydney
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| robevpau1 wrote: | SEN 1116
BREAKING: Geelong has traded picks 59 and 60 to Collingwood for pick 51. |
so, from 259 points to 304 points.
_________________
"Even when Im old and gray, I wont be able to play but Ill still love the game"
Michael Jordan |
|
|
|
|
Boogie Knights
Joined: 18 Sep 2015
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| This pick trade signals more than expected delistings... Can only use points from picks equivalent to the number of spaces on the list... |
|
|
|
|
MJ23
Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Location: Sydney
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| watt price tully wrote: | If someone makes a really high bid lets say pick 5 for example for Quaynor do we then have to fork out the points value of pick 5?
If we allow the nominating team to take Quaynor does this then have any impact on our draft selection (which I suspect it doesn't) or is our first pick then that which we are already allocated (forgetting about Kelly for the moment)? |
Points value of 5 less 20% discount so 1878pts down to 1502pts
_________________
"Even when Im old and gray, I wont be able to play but Ill still love the game"
Michael Jordan |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
