Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Trade period summary

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion
 
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Jezza Taurus

2023 PREMIERS!


Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Location: Ponsford End

PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 9:30 pm
Post subject: Trade period summaryReply with quote

IN:
- Dayne Beams
- Jordan Roughead
- Pick 41
- Pick 44
- Pick 59
- Pick 60

OUT:
- Alex Fasolo (free agency)
- Pick 18
- Future 1st round pick
- Pick 51
- Pick 56
- Pick 75

How do you rate the trade period?

_________________
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |


Last edited by Jezza on Sat Oct 27, 2018 11:19 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 9:38 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

So, translated strictly to points (make up something for what the future pick will be), what was the net loss for Beams?
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
stui magpie Gemini

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.


Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto

PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 9:38 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

In isolation, it's not bad.

But, add to that we just picked up 2 cat b Irish KPP and kept enough points to get IQ and Kelly, I'd give it a big tick.

Like I said in another thread, it's a nice mix.

Trade for now bringing in a top if ageing mid and a premiership tall as KPP depth who can also ruck. Both positives.

Draft for the future. we bring in 2 cat B KPP and IQ and Kelly.

So we load up for now while we're right in the window and also bring in quality kids so we won't slide in 2 years time. Add that to the depth we already have, A+

_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
slangman 



Joined: 11 Aug 2003


PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 9:58 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

At a glance, 2 first round picks is overs for Beams.
But if you look at 2 x pick 18 then Id say its about fair especially with where our list is at.
We are approaching the premiership window. Either we make a serious play for it (think Burgoyne to hawks) or we continue to hover around it without ever seriously threatening.

A bold move by the club. Yes it can go pear shaped.....but it could also be a masterstroke. Only time will tell but theres no denying that we are (on paper) better than this year.

If we can get our players on the ground, we will be the team to beat.

_________________
- Side By Side -
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger  
neil Sagittarius



Joined: 08 Sep 2005
Location: Queensland

PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 10:07 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Kind of like when the handbaggers got Ottens was expensive but won a premiership so was great value
_________________
Carlscum 120 years being cheating scum
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 10:08 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

What did they pay for Ottens?
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Jezza Taurus

2023 PREMIERS!


Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Location: Ponsford End

PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 10:15 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

K wrote:
What did they pay for Ottens?

Geelong traded picks 12 and 16 to Richmond for Ottens.

_________________
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
watt price tully Scorpio



Joined: 15 May 2007


PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 10:24 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

In isolation poor. In cotnext of what Stui has pointed out pretty good. Would have preferred trade options that gave us sufficent points for both Quaynor and Kelly.

So gains are:

Roughhead
Beams
*Quaynor
*Kelly
(+ add the two Irish Lads)

Losses:

Two x first round picks
Fasolo

Not bad.

_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
slangman 



Joined: 11 Aug 2003


PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 10:25 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

The Hawks gave up pick 9 and a very good small forward (Mark Williams) for some 28yo guy named Burgoyne....didnt turn out too bad them😉
_________________
- Side By Side -
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger  
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 10:33 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Who was that pick 9 used on?
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 10:34 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Jezza wrote:
K wrote:
What did they pay for Ottens?

Geelong traded picks 12 and 16 to Richmond for Ottens.

I see... Hmm...
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
PyreneesPie Pisces

PyreneesPie


Joined: 22 Aug 2014


PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 11:25 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

stui magpie wrote:
In isolation, it's not bad.

But, add to that we just picked up 2 cat b Irish KPP and kept enough points to get IQ and Kelly, I'd give it a big tick.

Like I said in another thread, it's a nice mix.

Trade for now bringing in a top if ageing mid and a premiership tall as KPP depth who can also ruck. Both positives.

Draft for the future. we bring in 2 cat B KPP and IQ and Kelly.

So we load up for now while we're right in the window and also bring in quality kids so we won't slide in 2 years time. Add that to the depth we already have, A+


Tend to agree Stui. There's no Tom Lynch or May in-traded, but I sure do like the ones we got/could get anyway!! Our mid-field and forward line could be an unpredictable nightmare to opposing teams next season....note I said "could be". Not making any assumptions about this cruel game that I sometimes wish I didn't love! Laughing
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
E 



Joined: 05 May 2010


PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 12:09 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

there is confusion as to pick 56 and why we included that in the Beams trade. Shouldnt we have included pick 57 as it doesnt come with points? Did we screw this up.
_________________
Ohhh, the Premiership's a cakewalk .......
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
think positive Libra

Side By Side


Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 12:15 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

watt price tully wrote:
In isolation poor. In cotnext of what Stui has pointed out pretty good. Would have preferred trade options that gave us sufficent points for both Quaynor and Kelly.

So gains are:

Roughhead
Beams
*Quaynor
*Kelly
(+ add the two Irish Lads)

Losses:

Two x first round picks
Fasolo

Not bad.


losses - 1 pick 18 (thats as close to round 2 as it gets yeah?)
and when we finish top next season thats another near enough round 2 pick.

fasolo, love the kid, but if hes not toasted through injury, hes still short, we just got 4 taller players! we are officially no longer a mosquito squad!

half full, not half empty! cheers

_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
K 



Joined: 09 Sep 2011


PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 12:20 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

E wrote:
there is confusion as to pick 56 and why we included that in the Beams trade. Shouldnt we have included pick 57 as it doesnt come with points? Did we screw this up.

I think the enemy insisted on getting the pick with points. (So, no, it was not an accident.)
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group