| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Pies4shaw 
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
| Youre the one with the myopia. Why don’t you tell us? |
|
|
|
 |
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Funny, isn’t it, how they get 2 fast goals when Langdon is off, injured? It’s time some of you people ho understand nothing about the game stop posting garbage about one of our best players. |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie 
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Surely he can't be blamed for goals when he's not on the ground?
_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| stui magpie wrote: | | Surely he can't be blamed for goals when he's not on the ground? |
I'm up for it, Stui.
i have marks against for all 4 St Kilda goals in the third.
 |
|
|
|
|
qldmagpie67
Joined: 18 Dec 2008
|
| Post subject: | |
|
E has accused me in the past of not acknowledging when Langdon plays well
Well today I thought his second half was the best he's ever contributed to a Collingwood win
Half time 38-35 were up by 5 (Langdon on the field)
Full time 112-71 win by 41 (Langdon off the field)
That's a + 36 turn around or 6 goals in a half
So in real terms we are 12 goals a game better when he's on the bench than on the field 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
On a serious note hope he's knee isn't to bad
ABC reporting possible PCL if which it is that's likely his season
He has a issue of knee injury don't know if it's the same one reported as chronic
Best wishes |
|
|
|
|
Cam 
Nick's BB Member #166
Joined: 10 May 2002
Location: Springvale
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Langdon is one we can't afford to lose. But if we do, we adapt.
_________________
Get back on top. |
|
|
|
|
inxs88
Joined: 17 Aug 2014
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Pies4shaw wrote: | | Funny, isn’t it, how they get 2 fast goals when Langdon is off, injured? It’s time some of you people ho understand nothing about the game stop posting garbage about one of our best players. |
Nick's is about measured and reasoned discussion versus nasty and personalised garbage. I just call what I see and open up threads for debate. That's all
_________________
I love the Pies, hate Carlscum |
|
|
|
|
AN_Inkling
Joined: 06 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
This game was one for the Langdon doubters. Our improved play coincided exactly with his removal from the ground. Maybe Mayne should play in defence?
_________________
Well done boys! |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| AN_Inkling wrote: | | This game was one for the Langdon doubters. Our improved play coincided exactly with his removal from the ground. Maybe Mayne should play in defence? |
That's a seriously long bow to draw.
_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
Bucks5
Nicky D - Parting the red sea
Joined: 23 Mar 2002
|
| Post subject: | |
|
He could be onto something. Same thing happened against Carlton after Adams left the ground.
_________________
How would Siri know when to answer "Hey Siri" unless it is listening in to everything you say? |
|
|
|
|
Magpietothemax 
magpietothemax
Joined: 28 Apr 2013
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| AN_Inkling wrote: | | This game was one for the Langdon doubters. Our improved play coincided exactly with his removal from the ground. Maybe Mayne should play in defence? |
I am surprised by this comment. It kind of reminds me of the old claims that we lose when Moore plays. How can you draw any correlation whatsoever with Langdon's absence and our turnaround? Last week we had a massive turn around (in 10 minutes as opposed to 30 minutes) and Langdon was on the ground. In the finals series last year, Langdon was huge.
_________________
Free Julian Assange!!
Ice in the veins |
|
|
|
|
piedys
Heeeeeeere's Dyso!!!
Joined: 04 Sep 2003
Location: Resident Forum Psychopath since 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Cam wrote: | | Langdon is one we can't afford to lose. But if we do, we adapt. |
If this happens, a lot of f*cking toys will be hurled out of the f*cking cot, by me, like missiles... 
_________________
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever |
|
|
|
|
AN_Inkling
Joined: 06 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Magpietothemax wrote: | | AN_Inkling wrote: | | This game was one for the Langdon doubters. Our improved play coincided exactly with his removal from the ground. Maybe Mayne should play in defence? |
I am surprised by this comment. It kind of reminds me of the old claims that we lose when Moore plays. How can you draw any correlation whatsoever with Langdon's absence and our turnaround? Last week we had a massive turn around (in 10 minutes as opposed to 30 minutes) and Langdon was on the ground. In the finals series last year, Langdon was huge. |
It was not a serious comment 
_________________
Well done boys! |
|
|
|
|
Magpietothemax
magpietothemax
Joined: 28 Apr 2013
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| AN_Inkling wrote: |
It was not a serious comment |
Oh, I am so happy about that! It restores my faith in your commentary! The sarcasm obviously went over my head. Cheers
_________________
Free Julian Assange!!
Ice in the veins |
|
|
|
|
inxs88
Joined: 17 Aug 2014
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Obviously we don't wish injury on anybody but with his likely time out, we should have a more self-assured and faster backline going forward.
_________________
I love the Pies, hate Carlscum |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
