| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
BazBoy
Joined: 11 Sep 2014
|
| Post subject: Graham Wright on trade radio today at 11.45 am |  |
|
Apparently Graham will be on AFL Trade Radio at 11.45 am today
Tune in
_________________
I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right |
|
|
|
 |
23 YIPPEE!!!
YIPPEE 23!!!
Joined: 24 Jul 2019
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Where can i tune in is it online. |
|
|
|
|
the fuzz
Fuzz loves Bruzz
Joined: 11 Aug 2008
|
|
|
|
|
the fuzz
Fuzz loves Bruzz
Joined: 11 Aug 2008
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Here's a very basic run down of what Wright talked about
They're very happy with getting Kreuger - Most likely playing as a forward
Not ruling out Cox just yet- saying he needs to play more time as a ruck if he is to go on.
We would like to retain Lynch, havent heard anything form Hawthorn yet.
We need backup ruckman.
Happy with Pendles re-signing for 2 years. Good club leader, whether he's captain next year or not.
Lipinski - confident on getting a fair deal done, but did not want to elaborate. Chance of getting him in PSD, but prob leaning on getting a deal done first.
So nothing we didn't really already know, but good to hear from the great man. |
|
|
|
|
kymbo5@yahoo.com.au
Joined: 23 Mar 2014
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Interesting interview. Not a lot of love for Josh Thomas.....
Very promising on the Lipinski deal happening.
_________________
kymbo |
|
|
|
|
mattdally
Joined: 21 Feb 2003
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Hearing Graeme Wright just now I would take away the following:
- JT not offered new contract - unlikely to be with us next year
- Cox not yet offered new contract - unlikely, but see what happens
- Lipinski - PSD is an option - preference is to not go down that path though
Key point he noted re Nick Daicos bid - we are only allowed to use the same number of picks as per available list spots to match the bid.
Therefore if we have 3 spots on our list, we can't use 27, 36, 43, 46, 48, 55, 58 to match it. We can only use 27, 36 and 43 |
|
|
|
|
BazBoy
Joined: 11 Sep 2014
|
| Post subject: | |
|
He knows his job and how to answer but not put all cards on table
Interesting when asked if they would walk Lipinski thru
“I’ve never done that before but then again never finished 17th before “
Good one Graham
_________________
I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right |
|
|
|
|
mudlark
Joined: 19 Mar 2002
Location: Maroochydore Qld
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| kymbo5@yahoo.com.au wrote: | Not a lot of love for Josh Thomas.....
|
Got to be happy with that. |
|
|
|
|
MJ23
Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Location: Sydney
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Gotta say, I thought it was a great interview where he answered every question but didn't actually say much of what he was thinking / doing behind the scenes.
I love that
_________________
"Even when Im old and gray, I wont be able to play but Ill still love the game"
Michael Jordan |
|
|
|
|
mudlark
Joined: 19 Mar 2002
Location: Maroochydore Qld
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Does anyone think that a "one out of left field" trade could be done with Hawthorn, with Lynch heading there and Mitchell coming to us?? Not sure what money he's on though and whether we could fit it under our cap. |
|
|
|
|
Crazypie
Joined: 21 May 2018
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| mudlark wrote: | | Does anyone think that a "one out of left field" trade could be done with Hawthorn, with Lynch heading there and Mitchell coming to us?? Not sure what money he's on though and whether we could fit it under our cap. |
Or Sic Dog Sicily.
_________________
Go Pies! |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie 
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| mattdally wrote: | Hearing Graeme Wright just now I would take away the following:
- JT not offered new contract - unlikely to be with us next year
- Cox not yet offered new contract - unlikely, but see what happens
- Lipinski - PSD is an option - preference is to not go down that path though
Key point he noted re Nick Daicos bid - we are only allowed to use the same number of picks as per available list spots to match the bid.
Therefore if we have 3 spots on our list, we can't use 27, 36, 43, 46, 48, 55, 58 to match it. We can only use 27, 36 and 43 |
OK, so we had 3 retirements, Greenwood, Mayne and Tohill. We've already added Kreuger and chasing Lipinski. That would only leave 1 spot so we'll have to either delist or trade out other players to have enough points to get Daicos and Dib and restock with rookies or the PSD.
_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
Macattacks 
Joined: 12 Sep 2021
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| stui magpie wrote: |
OK, so we had 3 retirements, Greenwood, Mayne and Tohill. We've already added Kreuger and chasing Lipinski. That would only leave 1 spot so we'll have to either delist or trade out other players to have enough points to get Daicos and Dib and restock with rookies or the PSD. |
Tohill is a category B rookie and doesn't free up a spot unless Keane can take his place (you are only allowed 1 Irish player as Cat B and Keane has another year as Cat A rookie left after they extended rookies another year because of Covid)
Lynch won't free up a spot either if his deal goes through, he's a Cat A rookie so you would imagine Thomas, Cox and Sier in real trouble
_________________
Moore De Goey |
|
|
|
|
Charlie Oneeye 
charlie oneeye
Joined: 23 Apr 2004
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| mattdally wrote: |
Therefore if we have 3 spots on our list, we can't use 27, 36, 43, 46, 48, 55, 58 to match it. We can only use 27, 36 and 43 |
That makes things awkward
Lippi and Kreuger replace JT and Cox.
Mayne, Levi.. Does Tohill Count ?
Do we need to delist more players ? or maybe we already have a shorter list size, and maybe we have access to more picks to use than we realise ?
We traded 22 for 27,under the circumstances, that move doesn't make sense. Something is amiss. |
|
|
|
|
Pies2016
Joined: 12 Sep 2014
|
| Post subject: | |
|
^ ^ ^
Rantall off primary list and then re rookied after the draft has been put out there as one option.
I thought we had one spare rookie spot up our sleeve. Didn’t we have three selections in mid year rookie draft and only use two ( ? )
My best guess would be that if Lynch is traded ( assuming he’s on rookie list ) then that would leave us with two spots to fill on rookie list if we did have a spare spot in the first place. Happy to be corrected if anyone’s got the answers |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
