The Hydra ~ Caro rears her head again

[Rd10.1998_11.1#36]

[scoobydoo]

So has that bloke Hatley abandoned the rest of the supporter group because HE got what HE wanted?

[didick]

^Got all those signatures from people wanting change and transparency and then walks away?

[Rd10.1998_11.1#36]

Hatley wasn't working alone. Another bloke from the group has picked up the baton, Vic Nicholas

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/pies-member-walks-away-from-egm-push-but-bid-not-over-20210617-p581qi.html

[mattdally]

In a new twist apparently we're committed to 40% women on the board to receive $15m government funding. This was one of the reasons we elected the bulldogs supporter.

Could we dig a deeper hole for ourselves. Amateur hour at it's best again at this club.

Sack the lot of them.

[Presti35]

[Magpies035]

Where are we at with the signatures
Are the original signatures being used to get the EGM happening?

What is a status?

[Rd10.1998_11.1#36]

^ Read the link I posted a few replies above

[swoop42]

If Browne wants to make the clubs handling of Nathan Buckley's coaching tenure a rallying point for his push to become President then it's only fair that he's transparent on what he would have done differently.

While any genuine Collingwood fan would have felt a real sense of sadness that Buckley's journey at the club had ended I suspect that a majority still supported the outcome of Wrights review.

But how about Browne?

If a voting member is happy that Collingwood will enter season 2022 with a new senior coach but also intends on voting for Browne would that vote change if Browne declares he would have made the final decision on Buckley (and one potentially in opposition of the Wright recommendation)?

Alternatively if any voting member plans on voting for Browne in protest because they disagree with the Buckley termination would that vote change if Browne states he would have also ultimately followed the recommendation of Wright or personally believes it was the right call?

While McGuire on footy classified last Wednesday refused to provide his opinion on the clubs decision to terminate Buckley for mine he's given off the distinct impression over the last couple of weeks he disagrees with it and I suspect Buckley would still be coach of Collingwood in 2022 if he remained President.

For me the spectre of Ed still lingers over Browne presently and it's why I want him to clarify his position on this issue.

[Presti35]

I dont know wtf is going on.

All's I know is if Browne gets in, he doesn't have the pressure of sacking Buckley before him.

[Jezza]

[Rd10.1998_11.1#36]

The problem is nobody except the club really knows whether people signing are voting members or not

[Mr Miyagi]

[Presti35]

So why did that Hatley bloke leave?

[K]

^ He met with club people and they did the spin thing and it worked.

But Hatley's work can still be used by those who helped him. Sounds like they still want an EGM.