View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
BazBoy
Joined: 11 Sep 2014
|
Post subject: Suspension during finals | |
|
Boomer Harvey get suspended and will miss next week
Well hello !! If your act is deemed bad enough for suspension thats the system
Why do the Darcy, s and Richo, s bleat the words "No way should he miss a final"
A head clash has resulted in suspension this year so no player is sbove the
law so to speak
Boomer only just came back from suspension
These bleeding hearts were, nt around in 77 to "get " Carman off _________________ I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right |
|
|
|
|
Woods Of Ypres
Joined: 27 May 2003 Location: Yugoslavia
|
Post subject: | |
|
agree in principle, but Boomer hardly touched him. one week for that is a joke. |
|
|
|
|
ANNODAM
Rebel Heart Tour - The Forum, Los Angeles 27/10/2015.
Joined: 02 Jul 2007 Location: Eltham, VIC.
|
Post subject: | |
|
I wonder how many weeks it would've been if those stripes were black instead of blue? _________________ WE WERE ROBBED, RIGHT IN FRONT OF ME, RIGHT IN FRONT OF MEEE!
N.Y METS, N.Y GIANTS, PENRITH PANTHERS & HOBART HURRICANES FAN.
WE ALL LOOK GOOD AT TRAINING, IT'S THE MATCHES THAT COUNT! |
|
|
|
|
BazBoy
Joined: 11 Sep 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
Agree not a lot in it but duty of care & head contact is dynamite
North will challenge it so Boomer still could play as long as his wrap
sheet / point deficit work against him
Hope North do well _________________ I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right |
|
|
|
|
themonk
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
|
Post subject: | |
|
ANNODAM wrote: | I wonder how many weeks it would've been if those stripes were black instead of blue? |
Exactly, just ask Pebbles & Phil.
Harvey is a serial offender & he deserves to miss. |
|
|
|
|
BazBoy
Joined: 11 Sep 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
Did he not just get back from suspension a week or two before end of home/away
round
Selwood got shitty and remonstrated with ump
Billy Brownless said hehad never seen him that animated _________________ I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right |
|
|
|
|
The Boy Who Cried Wolf
Joined: 26 Sep 2013 Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right
|
Post subject: | |
|
Woods Of Ypres wrote: | agree in principle, but Boomer hardly touched him. one week for that is a joke. |
I agree, the incident isn't even worthy of the time that will be wasted in tribunal. _________________ All Aboard!! Choo Choo!!! |
|
|
|
|
yin-YANG
Joined: 03 Oct 2011
|
Post subject: | |
|
Same rules should apply during finals as for Home and Away rounds... however I thought the contact was a joke and the case should have been thrown out.
Poor decision if he is in the blue and white stripes or black and white! _________________ Love us or Hate us... we are Collingwood - you can't ignore the Mighty Magpies!!! |
|
|
|
|
The Boy Who Cried Wolf
Joined: 26 Sep 2013 Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right
|
Post subject: | |
|
Official news - got 1 week - total joke (even though, he suxs). _________________ All Aboard!! Choo Choo!!! |
|
|
|
|
Damien
Me Noah & Flynn @ the G
Joined: 21 Jan 1999 Location: Croydon Vic
|
Post subject: | |
|
Any player that can physically clash with Selwood and avoid his head is a friggin genius. He's the biggest bloody ducker in the AFL and his head opens and bleeds if you so much as breath on him. Don't like either of them but I hope he gets off and I reckon he will. _________________ 'Collingwood are the Bradmans of Football'
The Herald - 1930 |
|
|
|
|
BazBoy
Joined: 11 Sep 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
Selwood head and its percieved halo does duck
Another umpire pink eye _________________ I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right |
|
|
|
|
swoop42
Whatcha gonna do when he comes for you?
Joined: 02 Aug 2008 Location: The 18
|
Post subject: | |
|
Accidental head on head contact.
You shouldn't miss a final because of that. _________________ He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD! |
|
|
|
|
The Boy Who Cried Wolf
Joined: 26 Sep 2013 Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right
|
Post subject: | |
|
swoop42 wrote: | Accidental head on head contact.
You shouldn't miss a final because of that. |
Or any game for that matter... _________________ All Aboard!! Choo Choo!!! |
|
|
|
|
Stinger
Joined: 01 Dec 2003 Location: Canberra
|
Post subject: | |
|
The accidental head on head contact rule is a joke. I can understand shoulder on head; arm on head; fist on head; but unless it's a deliberate head butt then it should be throw out - no case to answer.
There was more in Hawkins' jumper punch last week that this action, yet one is a suspension and one isn't. |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
swoop42 wrote: | Accidental head on head contact.
You shouldn't miss a final because of that. |
I agree, but that is the rule.
The rule needs to be changed, so that incidental head to head contact does not attract a penalty. If he'd collected Selwood with his shoulder or elbow, even accidentally, then I'd be in favour of a suspension, but not when it's a clash of heads. Seriously, Selwood is a sook and a lagger. Just hope he doesn't win the bloody brownlow. |
|
|
|
|
|