Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
#11 Daniel McStay

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 1 Guest
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 29, 30, 31  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Pies2016 



Joined: 12 Sep 2014


PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 4:34 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

neil wrote:
McStay just no a very poor forward
Kruger looks to injury prone
Degoey leaving would/might get an ear;y pick possibly same as Daniher pick 5

Use pick 5 to get a genuine KPF
Add our own first round pick and consider that vs McSay


Don’t want to burst your bubble but anything near pick 5 isn’t likely because a significant component of the compensation will be based on Collingwoods ladder position.
IF we should fall into the eight ( likely ), it’s going to be much closer to somewhere between 10 - 12. You’re right about Daniher but the Bombers finished lowly in 2020. Conversely, Franklin went to the swans and the Hawks got pick 19 as compensation because they were winning flags every year.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pebbles Rocks 



Joined: 28 Sep 2008
Location: Collingwood

PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 5:08 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Ronnie McKeowns boots wrote:
Fogarty at Adelaide would be cheaper and have a higher celling, although he could easily bust as well...would still prefer over a 29 year old with 11 goals for the year

He's not a free agent. Would cost us draft picks

_________________
"You must be a parking ticket, cuz you got fine written all over you" Glen Quagmire
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Big T 



Joined: 18 Oct 2003
Location: Torino, Italy

PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 5:15 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

McStay is McShit. If we lose de goey and it's for pick 12 then heads have to roll, all to appease the snow flakes of the world.
_________________
Buon Giorno
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies2016 



Joined: 12 Sep 2014


PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 6:50 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

^DeGoey is a restricted free agent. If another club offers him $200,000 a year more than we’re prepared to offer and he takes up that offer, I don’t see why heads need to roll. Free agency puts the ball in DeGoeys court, not the clubs. Business is business and the rules are the rules. Even a snowflake will tell you that.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pep 



Joined: 06 Apr 2018


PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 7:31 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

^Can't we match the deal and force a trade?
Surely if the compo was/would be pick 12, we could get a better return via trade scenario?
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
piffdog 



Joined: 18 Jun 2021


PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 8:04 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

^Don’t think this is technically correct (but happy to be set straight). You will be rewarded a first/end of first/second etc pick based on the value of the contract and the players age etc. (AFL has a formula apparently). this is the part that is a bit of a black box. Obviously then if you finish last and you lose a gun and get a first round pick then you get it straight after your first pick (1) so would get pick #2 as compensation. Maybe this is what you’re saying - but the value of the contract comes first and then where your trade picks are coming is second.

I do agree that it seems unlikely though. To get pick 5 we would have to finish low enough to qualify for pick #4 (14th) and then see a player leave as a free agent on a big enough contract to warrant first round compensation (pick #5). It would be unlikely one of our players would leave on such a lucrative contract and I hope we don’t finish as low as 14th…

Maybe though, we could take our first pick (let’s say that comes in around 9-10) and package it up with a compensation pick which comes at the end of the first round (say 18-20) and that might get us into the #5-7 range perhaps. Would be able to check the points attached to verify. Actually just checked - as an example, pick 4 has the same points as pick 12 and 25 combined.

_________________
It's never as good/nor bad as it seems...
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies2016 



Joined: 12 Sep 2014


PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 9:15 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Pep wrote:
Can't we match the deal and force a trade?
Surely if the compo was/would be pick 12, we could get a better return via trade scenario?


As a restricted free agent, if we match the offer, he is contractually obliged to stay ( unrestricted is different ) The point is, unless both parties want to continue the “ partnership “, then Collingwood wouldn’t bother to match the offer anyway.
There’s no trade involved in free agency unless Collingwood took a free agent. Then Collingwood may look to trade DeGoey as a preference but the trade would be unders because the club DeGoey is going to isn’t there to do Collingwood any favours when they don’t have to because he’s a free agent anyway. Hope that explains it.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
BazBoy 



Joined: 11 Sep 2014


PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 9:15 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

If he’s the guy wearing number 25 for Brisbane well he’s either very ordinary or just having an off night as we speak
_________________
I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies2016 



Joined: 12 Sep 2014


PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 9:41 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

piffdog wrote:
Don’t think this is technically correct (but happy to be set straight). You will be rewarded a first/end of first/second etc pick based on the value of the contract and the players age etc. (AFL has a formula apparently). this is the part that is a bit of a black box. Obviously then if you finish last and you lose a gun and get a first round pick then you get it straight after your first pick (1) so would get pick #2 as compensation. Maybe this is what you’re saying - but the value of the contract comes first and then where your trade picks are coming is second.

I do agree that it seems unlikely though. To get pick 5 we would have to finish low enough to qualify for pick #4 (14th) and then see a player leave as a free agent on a big enough contract to warrant first round compensation (pick #5). It would be unlikely one of our players would leave on such a lucrative contract and I hope we don’t finish as low as 14th…

Maybe though, we could take our first pick (let’s say that comes in around 9-10) and package it up with a compensation pick which comes at the end of the first round (say 18-20) and that might get us into the #5-7 range perhaps. Would be able to check the points attached to verify. Actually just checked - as an example, pick 4 has the same points as pick 12 and 25 combined.


The size of the contract is very important but the calculation of pick 10 - 12 has already been put forward by those who are smarter than me. Those pick outcomes are based on the likely scenario of something like $800,000 a year and us just scraping into the eight. The likelihood of both happening are fair and reasonable right now.
And yes, bundling up two first rounders in the teens should easily net a top 10 pick PROVIDED you can find a buyer. The clubs decision on bundling them up would be based on single priority target vs depth of draft. We also have three third rounders, so moving into the pointy end of the second round shouldn’t be a problem either if that’s the way they want to go ( which is very likely the moment Will Ashcroft chooses to nominate the Lions as an F / S prospect )
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Take_a_Screamer Leo

.....No.40...Ash Johnson...


Joined: 22 Aug 2018
Location: Melbourne S.E.Suburbs

PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 9:49 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Big T wrote:
McStay is McShit. If we lose de goey and it's for pick 12 then heads have to roll, all to appease the snow flakes of the world.

McStay got 11 possessions (3 marks) against a rampant Melbourne
McShit indeed!

_________________
Ash Johnson...you beauty
Johnson Screamer @ https://www.afl.com.au/video/931485/johnson-reaches-superman-heights-to-take-epic-mark? ❤️️
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger  
Colin G Wood 



Joined: 10 Mar 2003


PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 9:51 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

McStay. Please??? No way
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pep 



Joined: 06 Apr 2018


PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 10:25 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote: As a restricted free agent, if we match the offer, he is contractually obliged to stay ( unrestricted is different ) The point is, unless both parties want to continue the “ partnership “, then Collingwood wouldn’t bother to match the offer anyway.
There’s no trade involved in free agency unless Collingwood took a free agent. Then Collingwood may look to trade DeGoey as a preference but the trade would be unders because the club DeGoey is going to isn’t there to do Collingwood any favours when they don’t have to because he’s a free agent anyway. Hope that explains it.[/quote]

Perfect explanation Smile
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Rd10.1998_11.1#36 

rd10.1998_11.1#36


Joined: 18 Jul 2018
Location: Sevilla, Spain

PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 11:02 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Johnno75 wrote:
Yeah let’s recruit another 2nd string forward. It’s not like we have any at the moment….geez.


Exactly. He’s not a KPF which is what we need. We already have better 2/3rd talls

I would say he went missing tonight in their demolition by Melbourne but he was never there in the first place

_________________
https://forever.collingwoodfc.com.au/sav-sinks-the-dockers/
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Magpietothemax Taurus

magpietothemax


Joined: 27 Apr 2013


PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2022 11:42 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

I hope McStay stays with brisbane. I don't think he is what we require. He looks like a B grade Checkers.
_________________
Free Julian Assange!!
Ice in the veins
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Return of the baldfacts 



Joined: 18 Mar 2022


PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 2:05 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Not a fan. Looks very ordinary indeed. Rather develop Kreuger. At best a marginal improvement on Weideman or Stewart.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT + 10 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 29, 30, 31  Next
Page 5 of 31   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group