View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Johnson#26
Joined: 18 Dec 2003
|
Post subject: The Gavin Brown/Nicks BB Medal: Leaderboard after round 8 | |
|
I have finally got around to compiling the official leaderboard for the Gavin Brown/Nicks BB Medal for 2006. The only votes missing are from Anzac Day (I will fill them in once posted).
Without further ado, here is the leaderboard (remember, anyone can vote, but vote only once - a player can recieve as many votes as possible - there is no limit as to the amount of voters per round):
1: Dane Swan - 146
2: Josh Fraser - 100
3: Shane O'Bree - 69
3: Ben Johnson - 69
5: Leon Davis - 67
6: Heath Shaw - 65
7: Anthony Rocca - 57
8: Nathan Buckley - 53
9: Chris Tarrant - 51
10: Simon Prestigiacomo - 43
11: Brodie Holland - 40
11: Paul Licuria - 40
12: Ryan Lonie - 15
13: James Clement - 14
13: Dale Thomas - 14
13: Nick Maxwell - 14
14: Alan Didak - 6
14: Tarkyn Lockyer - 6
15: Shane Wakelin - 5
15: Scott Burns - 5
16: Harry O'Brien* - 3
17: Blake Caracella - 2
17: Guy Richards - 2
Have note polled:
Chris Egan
Ben Davies
Travis Cloke
Cameron Cloke
Jason Cloke |
|
|
|
|
burnsy17
Joined: 10 Aug 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
I tell you what, Swan wouldnt be a bad longshot for the Brownlow....
But knowing Sportsbet, he's probably at $10 second favourite _________________ Beware the swooping Magpie. |
|
|
|
|
stonedpies
Joined: 24 Apr 2004 Location: TAS
|
Post subject: | |
|
Can i offer a suggestion....would it be more reasonable to tally all the votes after a particular rd and then give the votes as a 3, 2, 1....I mean say if one round josh pulled 40 votes from the votes given by us, swanny 35, heater 30, johnno 23 etc etc then for that round give josh the 3 , swanny 2, Heater 1 for that particular round..
All im saying is that some rounds more people may put their votes in than other rounds...and if that happens it shouldnt be that a particular player should gain more votes just because more people have posted, if u get what i mean...
I dunno if this makes sense or not..more likely not
Carry on _________________ GO PIES |
|
|
|
|
favourites 2008
The Machine
Joined: 11 Aug 2003 Location: Mooroolbark
|
Post subject: | |
|
Yeh agree Stonedpies cos someone might be best on ground n every1 gives him 3 next week n then his almost winning the thing. _________________ Like Nicks, why not donate
http://magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm |
|
|
|
|
Magpie Since 1986
Traitor
Joined: 03 Aug 2002 Location: Collingwood
|
Post subject: | |
|
stonedpies wrote: | Can i offer a suggestion....would it be more reasonable to tally all the votes after a particular rd and then give the votes as a 3, 2, 1....I mean say if one round josh pulled 40 votes from the votes given by us, swanny 35, heater 30, johnno 23 etc etc then for that round give josh the 3 , swanny 2, Heater 1 for that particular round..
All im saying is that some rounds more people may put their votes in than other rounds...and if that happens it shouldnt be that a particular player should gain more votes just because more people have posted, if u get what i mean...
I dunno if this makes sense or not..more likely not
Carry on |
Yes that is how you have to do it. Makes no sense the way it is now. Each game has to be worth equal weight, the fact that a different number of people give their votes each week stuffs it up. You have to average it out somehow or it is pointless. |
|
|
|
|
Magpie Since 1986
Traitor
Joined: 03 Aug 2002 Location: Collingwood
|
Post subject: | |
|
I would do it as, everyone gives their 3-2-1 for the round and you tally that up, then:
Most votes for the round gets 5 points
2nd most votes gets 4 points
3rd most votes gets 3 points
4th most votes gets 2 points
5th most votes gets 1 point
That way each round is worth the same no matter how many people post their votes. |
|
|
|
|
stonedpies
Joined: 24 Apr 2004 Location: TAS
|
Post subject: | |
|
Magpie Since 1986 wrote: | I would do it as, everyone gives their 3-2-1 for the round and you tally that up, then:
Most votes for the round gets 5 points
2nd most votes gets 4 points
3rd most votes gets 3 points
4th most votes gets 2 points
5th most votes gets 1 point
That way each round is worth the same no matter how many people post their votes. |
Yep, that would work well i reckon _________________ GO PIES |
|
|
|
|
Johnson#26
Joined: 18 Dec 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
Yes, maybe. I'll have a look and change it if need be. For now (including the Anzac Game), here is the official leaderboard:
Rank: Name: Votes:
1 Dane Swan 148
2 Ben Johnson 131
3 Josh Fraser 101
4 Heath Shaw 94
5 Shane O'Bree 69
6 Leon Davis 67
7 Nathan Buckley 66
8 Anthony Rocca 57
9 Chris Tarrant 51
10 Simon Prestigiacomo 51
11 Alan Didak 44
12 Paul Licuria 40
13 Brodie Holland 40
14 Dale Thomas 17
15 Ryan Lonie 15
16 Nick Maxwell 14
17 James Clement 14
18 Tarkyn Lockyer 6
19 Scott Burns 5
20 Shane Wakelin 5
21 Harry O'Brien* 3
22 Guy Richards 2
23 Blake Caracella 2
24 Shannon Cox* 0
25 Danny Nicholls* 0
26 Alan Toovey* 0
27 Brent Hall 0
28 Adam Iacobucci 0
29 Sam Iles 0
30 Jason Cloke 0
31 Cameron Cloke 0
32 Travis Cloke 0
33 John Anthony 0
34 David Fanning 0
35 Ryan Cook 0
36 Danny Stanley 0
37 Rhyce Shaw 0
38 Ben Davies 0
39 Scott Pendlebury 0
40 Chris Egan 0
41 Tristan Walker 0
42 Julian Rowe 0
43 Chad Morrison 0
44 Sean Rusling 0 |
|
|
|
|
|