View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
rand corp
Joined: 06 Feb 2003 Location: south east asia
|
Post subject: | |
|
3. Beams
2. Cox
1. Fraser
Apologies, Pendles, Swan |
|
|
|
|
Pies4Life
Joined: 29 Sep 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
3. Fraser
2. Beams
1. Swan _________________ Premiers #08 |
|
|
|
|
Captain_MyCaptain
Joined: 25 May 2006 Location: home
|
Post subject: | |
|
overall poor perrformance.
3. Fraser
2. Swan
1. Beams _________________ The window is open my friend! |
|
|
|
|
DaVe86
Man of Steele
Joined: 08 Oct 2004 Location: Melbourne
|
Post subject: | |
|
3. Swan
2. Beams
1. Fraser
Fraser was probably our best on ground to be honest...but his poor conversion rate in front of goal was a telling factor we lost.
He could've single handedly kept us in the game at 3 quarter time but he missed a shot he would've normally got. Cant call him BOG. _________________ There's more to life than footy.........just not much more. |
|
|
|
|
lethal68
Joined: 20 Sep 2004 Location: Adelaide
|
Post subject: | |
|
3. Beams
2. Swan
1. Fraser _________________ "He is a loathsome brute, yet I cannot look away." |
|
|
|
|
qldmagpie67
Joined: 18 Dec 2008
|
Post subject: | |
|
3. Swan
2. Beams
1. Cox
Funny thing I looked at the stats and they didnt credit Beams with a tackle at all and I can clearly remember him applying 2 to Selwood at the centre bounce.
Really if we had kicked even half way decent from set shots we should have had the cats on toast by the end of the 3rd quarter. |
|
|
|
|
Lone Ranger
Joined: 02 Apr 2003 Location: Macedon Ranges
|
Post subject: | |
|
Fraser? So slowing up the play whenver you mark it, not going with the first option, running around not hurting the opposition with your disposal, getting clear hitouts but not hitting it to your own team, missing crucial shots gets you votes!?!?!? WOW. Fraser was absolutely terrible.
Beams, Swan did OK, Harry tried. Didak did a little. Everyone else was terrible. |
|
|
|
|
Presti35
Dick Lee for Legend Status
Joined: 05 Oct 2001 Location: London, England
|
Post subject: | |
|
3. Swan
2. Beams
1. Fraser _________________ A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned! |
|
|
|
|
Jace
Joined: 17 May 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
3. Fraser (2nd bog in a row, great form)
2. Swan
1. Tarks |
|
|
|
|
AN_Inkling
Joined: 06 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
3. Fraser (clear best for the 2nd week in a row, though looks to be tiring under heavy workload)
2. Swan
1. Beams
Other notables: Cox and Clarke continued with their improved form. _________________ Well done boys! |
|
|
|
|
maggies2003
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
Very Very suprising to see Pendles named for a few votes. |
|
|
|
|
Piethagoras' Theorem
the hypotenuse, is always a cakewalk
Joined: 29 May 2006
|
Post subject: | |
|
I think that polo neck is cutting blood supply to your brain? _________________ Formally frankiboy and FrankieGoesToCollingwood. |
|
|
|
|
favourites 2008
The Machine
Joined: 11 Aug 2003 Location: Mooroolbark
|
|
|
|
|
mattdally
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
|
Post subject: | |
|
3. Fraser
2. Pendles
1. Medhurst |
|
|
|
|
Cuthbert Collingwood
Once was on fire, now all at sea
Joined: 08 Dec 2005 Location: The BBC (Brunswick Bowling Club)
|
Post subject: | |
|
3. Fraser
2. Tarks
1. Beams
was a game of quarters. no pie was consistent over the 4 _________________ McRae for Governor-General! |
|
|
|
|
|