Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Essendon players cleared

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Nick's Other AFL
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
OEP Pisces



Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Location: Perth

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 1:06 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Deja Vu wrote:
Dark Beanie wrote:
So are Dank and Hird going to come clean, be honest and let the players know exactly what they were injected with?

If they are not guilty of using PEDs there is no reason not to.
All the substances were obviously legal.


Spot on - let's find out exactly what was injected. They have nothing to fear if it was all above board. Let the public decide.


Surely if they had nothing to hide they would've revealed the substances used at the start of the investigation rather than at the end of the trial.

I laugh that the AFL are crapping on about Dank still being possibly in trouble. How exactly can that be, according to the AFL he oversaw a completely legal off-site systematic regime of multiple injections that required a player waiver to indemnify Essendon from any future action from the players. If Essendon isn't guilty then Dank can't be found guilty either.

It's not like the AFL have a history of stating things didn't happen and then find a way to punish the club through and obscure rule or scape goat. I mean look at how they handled the Demons match fixing investigation.

_________________
A Collingwood supporter since the egg was inseminated.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
OEP Pisces



Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Location: Perth

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 1:15 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Got to admit though even before this decision I was finding it hard to watch AFL, but this really has tipped the scale for me. The AFL need to realise they can only push the viewing, and paying, public so far and there are other sports out there to watch.

For me it's now NFL, NRL, and the AFL waaaaaaaay below them. I'll only be watching AFL now when there's nothing else to watch and even then I'll probably just watch a movie, and I'll definitely never be a member of the CFC or pay to watch a game again because I won't use my money to bankroll such a shoddy sports code.

_________________
A Collingwood supporter since the egg was inseminated.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
didick 

didick


Joined: 17 Jun 2009
Location: Brisbane

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:52 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

In my mind the players got off because, very conveniently, EFC had no records of what they systematically injected their players with, over an extended period. Of course the club, and particularly James Hird, knew. For him to say it wasn't his job and so he didn't know is the biggest load of bullshit in history. If the EFC had any integrity they would have sacked him when it all started and deleted him from club records.

It was impossible to prove the substance used with no records and no talking from those who knew. I don't know what happens if Dank comes out and says it was TB4. Should that mean players get banned? I would think so.

Meanwhile anyone else with a positive test will have to prove they didn't take a substance, which can be as hard a case as Asada had in proving the EFC players did. I feel for those who may suffer the consequences from accidental consumption etc while the bombers players get off after a high probability they were doped.

_________________
"The night is a very dark time for me" Chaz Michael Michaels
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Dave The Man Scorpio



Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 12:18 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Robbo still has a Stiffy:

http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/essendon-rises-from-ashes-after-not-guilty-doping-verdict/story-fndv8gad-1227286937223

_________________
I am Da Man
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Warnings : 1 
didick 

didick


Joined: 17 Jun 2009
Location: Brisbane

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 1:54 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Dave The Man wrote:
Robbo still has a Stiffy:

http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/essendon-rises-from-ashes-after-not-guilty-doping-verdict/story-fndv8gad-1227286937223


What a pathetic article!!!
Sticking up for Hird, implying it was all Dank and Robinson's doing. What a croc. The man at the top of the tree, with ultimate responsibility for his players can fob his responsibility to an underling and an outsider? He can let them be systematically injected but not have to know what with? This is just fantasy land!!
Absolutely disgusting.
And I am sick of all the media saying they were found not guilty. It was found that there wasn't sufficient evidence. And that evidence just happened to disappear or not be kept. How convenient.

_________________
"The night is a very dark time for me" Chaz Michael Michaels
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Dave The Man Scorpio



Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 5:10 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

More news that comes out - The Bigger of a Joke it come
_________________
I am Da Man
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Warnings : 1 
Bucks5 Capricorn

Nicky D - Parting the red sea


Joined: 23 Mar 2002


PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 5:25 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

The problem is that the AFL had every incentive to find them not guilty.

A guilty verdict would have resulted in a flood of legal action against the AFL by the players, and the effect on the 2015 competition, TV rights and the sport's reputation would have been devastating.

I found it interesting that there were two long standing County court judges were on the AFL's tribunal. A court of law uses the "beyond reasonable doubt' test, so I wonder whether these two actually applied the lower threshold of guilt that was meant to have been applied.

_________________
How would Siri know when to answer "Hey Siri" unless it is listening in to everything you say?
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
sixpoints 



Joined: 27 Sep 2010
Location: Lulie Street

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:08 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Went to the MCC Launch of the 2015 season in the members dining room at the MCG today.
Key note speakers were Alastsir Clarkson, Trent Cochin & Matthew Lloyd.
Naturally the issue of Essendon (and us) was raised. I won't bang on about what was said by whom etc, but Lloyd was very circumspect regarding his old club.
It was clear he was very unhappy at what had transpired at Essendon and said so very plainly. He stated he was relieved for the players, but he did not consider the matter over. He clearly as an ex player had the player point of view and he was not in any way supportive of the Essendon club admin.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Jezza Taurus

2023 PREMIERS!


Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Location: Ponsford End

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 11:21 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

sixpoints wrote:
Went to the MCC Launch of the 2015 season in the members dining room at the MCG today.
Key note speakers were Alastsir Clarkson, Trent Cochin & Matthew Lloyd.
Naturally the issue of Essendon (and us) was raised. I won't bang on about what was said by whom etc, but Lloyd was very circumspect regarding his old club.
It was clear he was very unhappy at what had transpired at Essendon and said so very plainly. He stated he was relieved for the players, but he did not consider the matter over. He clearly as an ex player had the player point of view and he was not in any way supportive of the Essendon club admin.

Interesting considering Lloyd tweeted that he was over the moon about the decision yesterday and said it was a great result for footy.

https://twitter.com/MatthewLloyd18/status/582742788350943232

_________________
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
selkevh 



Joined: 04 Oct 2008
Location: Brisbane

PostPosted: Sat Apr 04, 2015 11:31 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Great to see them fade in the last quarter due to sitting out their players during the preseason. This may have still set them back for a few weeks.
_________________
A strong man stands up for himself ... a stronger man stands up for others.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
think positive Libra

Side By Side


Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere

PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2015 10:19 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Ead essendon thread in bay 13 Big footy, hilarious!

Also the booing of James hird

A bomber fan couldn't believe the swans fans booing hird

Some other supporter," closest they've ever been to Real AFL fans!'

_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
woodys_world69 



Joined: 04 Jul 2005
Location: Brisbane

PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2015 10:29 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

im very very confused....
Jobe Watson admits to taking AOD on tv (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79-jvCbTGa0)

now the case against the player has been thrown out due to lack of evidence? he ADMITTED IT!

I would be totally behind ASADA taking the AFL to the supreme court with this
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Jezza Taurus

2023 PREMIERS!


Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Location: Ponsford End

PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 12:52 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

The drug in question during Tuesday's decision was related to Thymosion beta-4 not AOD-9604 even though I think you raise valid concerns and arguments about AOD-9604.

In regards to AOD-9604 I still haven't been able to ascertain from anyone whether it's legal or not for use by professional sporting athletes in Australia however I'm pretty certain under the WADA code it's illegal to use for sporting athletes but I'm not sure what ASADA's stance is on this.

_________________
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Bucks5 Capricorn

Nicky D - Parting the red sea


Joined: 23 Mar 2002


PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 8:32 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

The Seedsmeister wrote:
I hope they checked Charter's and Alavi's bank accounts to see if any sizable deposits were made by Hird or the EFC.



This article has confirmed my earlier suspicions that there was a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.......

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/meet-the-millionaire-who-struck-bombers-peace-deal/story-fni0fiyv-1227292301387
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Jezza Taurus

2023 PREMIERS!


Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Location: Ponsford End

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 12:50 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

I suspect you're on the right track Seedsmeister. Essendon undermined the investigation at every point so this wouldn't surprise me.

Anyway last night I was watching 'Talking Footy' on Channel 7 and Tim Watson just couldn't help himself last night. He was whinging about an article in The Age written by Roy Masters who was critical of the Essendon's supplement saga and the fallout of the decision made last Tuesday. I thought his articles about the saga have been great and really aligned with the thoughts of many here and elsewhere.

Watson then asserted that everyone was 'sick of the saga', even though most people would rather hear the truth no matter how ugly it may be so he doesn't speak for me or countless others here who want to hear what really happened at Windy Hill and he said that the decision was made by an independent tribunal and there wasn't enough evidence to establish Essendon's guilt, yet he conveniently forgets that the evidence was either never retained of Essendon supplementation of substances or Essendon destroyed evidence that would have clearly established their guilt in the first place.

Watson and Essendon can mollycoddle it all they like but the general footy public isn't so stupid to fall for your rhetoric and that's why Essendon will always be a tainted club for mine. The mere fact that Hird is still coaching the club is absurd.

_________________
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Nick's Other AFL All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Page 4 of 4   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group