Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Pre match. Pies v. Crows - All comments please

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 1 Guest
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10, 11  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
think positive Libra

Side By Side


Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere

PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2015 6:35 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Jezza wrote:
Tannin wrote:
Plus we are weak in the talls department: Grundy can't be expected to go around again this week all by himself with the same energy he put in last week .... and if he does, he's a friggin' champion already! I's really really like to see Gault come in to give us all-day tall options up forward and give Grundy a break.

Who are the emergencies this week? Late change any chance?

Good post Tannin!

I share your concerns about the burden that Grundy will carry as the number one ruckman this week again despite the fatigue he endured in last week's match against the Lions in the latter stages of the game. I suspect that Buckley and the coaching staff will primarily use Grundy as our ruckman for an overwhelming period of time but Jesse White will be the pinch-hitting ruckman when Grundy has his inevitable rests on the bench throughout the match.

In regards to your question about the emergencies listed, the following players that are listed as emergencies for this match are Sam Dwyer, Patrick Karnezis and Corey Gault.


Last weeks heat / humidity factor probably made the fitness levels across the board look worse than they are. Etihad is small and covered, (I think so anyway, it looks smaller!) so hopefully a bit of a rest. Not sure what to expect. The fun of a young team, who's going to show up! Cheers

_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
watt price tully Scorpio



Joined: 15 May 2007


PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2015 9:28 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

think positive wrote:
Albow wrote:
Im rapt with the inclusion of Seedsman, his ability to break the lines and depth with his kicking are fine assets to our backline. Once he establishes himself in the team I think you will find he will be a vital cog in our defensive rebounds.


And he can kick!


Overrated kick in my view.

He has a lovely style but jeez he kicks a lot of points. Hopefully, that improves along with his less than good defensive skills.

I'm excited by Oxley who is a terrific kick, better mark & better defensively than Seeds. Seeds on a wing might be interesting.

_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
gurugeoff 



Joined: 09 Oct 2013


PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2015 10:26 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

perthmagpie wrote:
Where is Kennedy? Not named in AFL or VFL team.

i was thinking he has been placed in the never play again bucket, given that he can't get a game in the midfield even with Sidebottom, Greenwood and Thomas out. But as stated previously, perhaps he is injured.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2015 12:27 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

^^^ No, he hurt himself late in the VFL game last week. If he were fit and firing, he would play ahead of Greenwood and Thomas (but not Sidebottom).
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
ThePieMind 



Joined: 11 Apr 2009


PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2015 12:56 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Pies4shaw wrote:
^^^ No, he hurt himself late in the VFL game last week. If he were fit and firing, he would play ahead of Greenwood and Thomas (but not Sidebottom).


Not sure I can agree.
Greenwood has far more grunt and size - he is 11kg heavier than BK and 6cm taller.
BK doesn't have the inside game of Greenwood.
So I would take Greenwood ahead of BK, and Thomas is more line ball, but this is academic seeing he will be rubbed out.

I really want BK to succeed but we need far more than the glimpses of talent that we have seen todate.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Dave The Man Scorpio



Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia

PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2015 2:57 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Yn1xwu5h10Q
_________________
I am Da Man
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Warnings : 1 
RudeBoy 



Joined: 28 Nov 2005


PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2015 3:18 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Dave The Man wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Yn1xwu5h10Q


I've seen that clip about 20 times and it still cracks me up. Laughing
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Mossi Leo



Joined: 20 May 2002
Location: Vittorio Veneto TV Italy

PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2015 3:31 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

roar wrote:
Nice to see we've added another halfback flanker. He'll slot in well with the other 7.

Very Happy I would call them defensive midfielders, looks like Bucks wants more rotations in the halfback area so he wants players that can play that position. Mind you Seedsmall is an attacking half back!!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
HAL 

Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.


Joined: 17 Mar 2003


PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2015 3:33 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote] D he or she would call them defensive midfielders sounds very attractive.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
R_T_RUSH 



Joined: 05 May 2008


PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2015 3:36 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

ThePieMind wrote:
Pies4shaw wrote:
^^^ No, he hurt himself late in the VFL game last week. If he were fit and firing, he would play ahead of Greenwood and Thomas (but not Sidebottom).


Not sure I can agree.
Greenwood has far more grunt and size - he is 11kg heavier than BK and 6cm taller.
BK doesn't have the inside game of Greenwood.
So I would take Greenwood ahead of BK, and Thomas is more line ball, but this is academic seeing he will be rubbed out.

I really want BK to succeed but we need far more than the glimpses of talent that we have seen todate.


The Kennedy/Thomas cloning experiment has failed. One has shot himself in the foot the other is a foot too short.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Dave The Man Scorpio



Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia

PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2015 3:42 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Sloane is in Doubt

http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-premiership/rory-sloane-in-doubt-for-adelaide-after-missing-training-today/story-e6frf3e3-1227298801484?sv=115af7cd3ade9074b24904a36bf1fa07

_________________
I am Da Man
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Warnings : 1 
think positive Libra

Side By Side


Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere

PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2015 4:43 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

watt price tully wrote:
think positive wrote:
Albow wrote:
Im rapt with the inclusion of Seedsman, his ability to break the lines and depth with his kicking are fine assets to our backline. Once he establishes himself in the team I think you will find he will be a vital cog in our defensive rebounds.


And he can kick!


Overrated kick in my view.

He has a lovely style but jeez he kicks a lot of points. Hopefully, that improves along with his less than good defensive skills.

I'm excited by Oxley who is a terrific kick, better mark & better defensively than Seeds. Seeds on a wing might be interesting.


Cheaper points than clokes though!

_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Piesnchess 

piesnchess


Joined: 09 Jun 2008


PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2015 7:20 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Pies by eight points, just a hunch I have, nothing more.
_________________
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
stui magpie Gemini

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.


Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto

PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2015 7:50 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

watt price tully wrote:
think positive wrote:
Albow wrote:
Im rapt with the inclusion of Seedsman, his ability to break the lines and depth with his kicking are fine assets to our backline. Once he establishes himself in the team I think you will find he will be a vital cog in our defensive rebounds.


And he can kick!


Overrated kick in my view.

He has a lovely style but jeez he kicks a lot of points. Hopefully, that improves along with his less than good defensive skills.

I'm excited by Oxley who is a terrific kick, better mark & better defensively than Seeds. Seeds on a wing might be interesting.


he gets the points mainly because he's going for extra length, whereas when he passes he's very very good.

i'd like him on the wing too, he can loop back through half back and run forward, but lets be realistic. The game now only has set positions at centre bounces. Once the ball hits the deck it's an under 10's game of everyone follow the ball.

_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
watt price tully Scorpio



Joined: 15 May 2007


PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2015 8:57 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

stui magpie wrote:
watt price tully wrote:
think positive wrote:
Albow wrote:
Im rapt with the inclusion of Seedsman, his ability to break the lines and depth with his kicking are fine assets to our backline. Once he establishes himself in the team I think you will find he will be a vital cog in our defensive rebounds.


And he can kick!


Overrated kick in my view.

He has a lovely style but jeez he kicks a lot of points. Hopefully, that improves along with his less than good defensive skills.

I'm excited by Oxley who is a terrific kick, better mark & better defensively than Seeds. Seeds on a wing might be interesting.


he gets the points mainly because he's going for extra length, whereas when he passes he's very very good.

i'd like him on the wing too, he can loop back through half back and run forward, but lets be realistic. The game now only has set positions at centre bounces. Once the ball hits the deck it's an under 10's game of everyone follow the ball.


How many times do I have to tell you Stui? Your mother & I have had concerns for a while now. The under 10's is just that under 10's. You can't expect to play each week just because you've done your homework & kept your room clean for a week.

_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT + 10 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10, 11  Next
Page 9 of 11   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group