|
|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
Out: Kreuger, Kelly
In: Pendles, Ruscoe (sub)
That leaves us almost totally reliant on Frampton in the ruck, which is not ideal, but unfortunately we don't really have any other options, given that Steene is not ready for senior footy. Kelly might keep his spot, but I actually prefer Ruscoe, who is physically stronger and seems calmer under pressure.
I'll be happy with a 1 point win, but expect we'll win by 17 points. |
|
|
|
|
joemamone@gmail.com
Joined: 27 Jul 2020
|
Post subject: | |
|
I am not sold on Hill - I would like to see Murley debut or McInnes in. _________________ Believer |
|
|
|
|
gurugeoff
Joined: 09 Oct 2013
|
Post subject: | |
|
joemamone@gmail.com wrote: | I am not sold on Hill - I would like to see Murley debut or McInnes in. |
certainly when elliot, Hill and Ginnavan do not kick a goal between them, it might look like we have too many smalls for not much return.
I think Hill is safe, for what he can potentially do. Elliot or Ginnavan perhaps make way for Carmichael. It's great that we are on top, and keep winning and all, but this forward line needs improvement to go all the way. |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
gurugeoff wrote: | joemamone@gmail.com wrote: | I am not sold on Hill - I would like to see Murley debut or McInnes in. |
certainly when elliot, Hill and Ginnavan do not kick a goal between them, it might look like we have too many smalls for not much return.
I think Hill is safe, for what he can potentially do. Elliot or Ginnavan perhaps make way for Carmichael. It's great that we are on top, and keep winning and all, but this forward line needs improvement to go all the way. |
Our smalls will come to the fore, when we have a genuine big KPF to bring the ball to ground. |
|
|
|
|
swoop42
Whatcha gonna do when he comes for you?
Joined: 02 Aug 2008 Location: The 18
|
Post subject: | |
|
While I'm very happy we finally get the chance to play the Swans in Melbourne and at the G people would be foolish to underestimate them on the back of a patch of poor form while dealing with injuries.
Longmire is one of the best in the business, he's missed finals only twice since 2011 and outside those seasons the Swans he leads rarely put in non competitive displays of football like we witnessed against Geelong this year.
Another week, another tough challenge for our own injury hit side. _________________ He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD! |
|
|
|
|
Haff
Joined: 25 Apr 2016
|
Post subject: | |
|
Fly seemed to think Cox was a chance for this game or has that changed?
Assuming so:
Out: Krueger, Elliot (needs a spell)
In: Cox, Pendles
Ruscoe Sub? Was stiff to get dropped. _________________ The match day thread is for unfiltered BS knee jerk reactions. The time for level headed comment comes after. |
|
|
|
|
lazzadesilva
Joined: 04 Feb 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
They won’t drop Elliot. Pendles and Cox will come in. _________________ I term the current Collingwood attack based strategy “Unceasing Waves” like on a stormy and windy day with rough seas. A Perfect Storm ☔️ |
|
|
|
|
Haff
Joined: 25 Apr 2016
|
Post subject: | |
|
lazzadesilva wrote: | They won’t drop Elliot. Pendles and Cox will come in. |
Yeah struggling for who gets dropped… made an excuse.. _________________ The match day thread is for unfiltered BS knee jerk reactions. The time for level headed comment comes after. |
|
|
|
|
Pies2016
Joined: 12 Sep 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
I would have thought if Cox is available, then he comes straight into the seniors. We’re that bereft of talls, surely an underdone Cox is still better than Krueger who hadn’t played for a season and Kelly who had very little impact on the weekend. Any time Cox spends on the ball, would automatically release Frampton to full back. Conversely, even if Cox parks himself in the goal square all day, at least Checkers has some support down there. |
|
|
|
|
inxs88
Joined: 17 Aug 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
Reckon that Cox's severe injury means a game in the Reserves maybe a wise choice. Not wanting to be arrogant but managing Steele, Jamie, Mitchell, Mihocek, Adams etc... isn't a bad thing over the next month.
Outs:
* Elliott: managed
* Krueger: injured
* Kelly: Omit
Ins:
* Carmichael: reward
* Ruscoe
* Pendles
B: Quaynor Moore Maynard
HB: Crisp Ruscoe N Daicos
C: J Daicos DeGoey Steele
HF: Ginnivan Johnson McCreery
F: Hill Mihocek WHE
F: Frampton P'bury Mitchell
iCH: Murphy, Noble, Adams, Markov
SUB: Carmichael _________________ I love the Pies, hate Carlscum |
|
|
|
|
Pies2016
Joined: 12 Sep 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
inxs88 wrote: | Reckon that Cox's severe injury means a game in the Reserves maybe a wise choice. Not wanting to be arrogant but managing Steele, Jamie, Mitchell, Mihocek, Adams etc... isn't a bad thing over the next month. |
Absolutely it’s the wise choice but I just sense desperation at the selection table whenever the spine and ruck comes into the conversation. Having said that, I’ve just gone back and seen that he hasn’t played since Port, so that’s five weeks of inactivity and really not worth the possible risk that comes with losing him again. Weather looks like rubbish on Sunday too, so maybe if ever we can get away with an undersized team, it’s this weekend. I’ve changed my mind, hold him back until the Giants the following week. |
|
|
|
|
Skids
Quitting drinking will be one of the best choices you make in your life.
Joined: 11 Sep 2007 Location: Joined 3/6/02 . Member #175
|
Post subject: | |
|
Pies $1.42
Swans $2.90
Pies v D's GF is @ $9.50
The $50 on Nick to win the Charlie @ 50/1 has a cash out offer of $340. he is $2.50 now. _________________ Don't count the days, make the days count. |
|
|
|
|
Pebbles Rocks
Joined: 28 Sep 2008 Location: Collingwood
|
Post subject: | |
|
Cox as not trained at all for a month until last week, not even a jog. He won't play _________________ "You must be a parking ticket, cuz you got fine written all over you" Glen Quagmire |
|
|
|
|
Magpietothemax
magpietothemax
Joined: 28 Apr 2013
|
Post subject: | |
|
I didn't think Will Kelly was as ineffective as others thought, and i saw a few promising signs.Maybe he needs a more strictly defined role. I would play him again. He can't improve if we don't play him, and I thought i saw ability there. I wouldn't be throwing Cox in straight away.
We also need to consider who the Swans have available. Just checking their website, it looks like Hickey will be ready to play, who is superior to Ladhams. So we will need another tall to stabilise our structure.
My conclusion:
Pendles comes in (Kreuger out)
Sub: Kelly
If Murph is unable to play due to the head high knock he got from Fogarty, then Kelly plays in the 22. _________________ Free Julian Assange!!
Ice in the veins |
|
|
|
|
stoliboy
Joined: 15 Aug 2003 Location: Sydney, NSW
|
Post subject: | |
|
I’m nervous about our next 2 weeks.
Swans have won the last 3 against the Pies (our last win was at the Gabba in 2020).
GWS. We won last time but previous to that GWS had won the previous 4 times.
We should win both. We are an improved team on last year and both games at the MCG. Fly to get his first win against the Swans _________________ Sydney Collingwood Supporters Club
http://sydneymagpies.magpies.net/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
|