5. Sidebottom
4. Cloke
3. Keeffe
2. Maxwell
1. Swan
GB Medal votes. Pies v. Port.
-
Neil Appleby
- Posts: 4068
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 1998 11:10 am
- Location: Melbourne
5. Sidebottom
4. Goldsack
3. Pendlebury
2. Cloke
1. Harry
4. Goldsack
3. Pendlebury
2. Cloke
1. Harry
Last edited by Neil Appleby on Sat Apr 21, 2012 7:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
After the epic draw comes the decisive knockout!
Collingwood rules the world again and Mick Malthouse fulfils his destiny with the twenty ten premiership and can you hear the people sing!
Collingwood rules the world again and Mick Malthouse fulfils his destiny with the twenty ten premiership and can you hear the people sing!
-
John Wren
- Posts: 24186
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm
david - i was going to reference a comment (which has disappeared) you made in response to donny's questioning of someone putting keeffe ahead of swan.
i think it would be interesting if voters could append their votes with the location of how they watched the game, i.e. tv, bay 33 row d etc. this would give context to their decision making.
i find when i watch from an elevated view i am focusing on the next two kicks ahead of the play rather than the play itself. sitting on ground level is difficult to see the other end and the tv only really shows you who has (or is near) the ball.
i think it would be interesting if voters could append their votes with the location of how they watched the game, i.e. tv, bay 33 row d etc. this would give context to their decision making.
i find when i watch from an elevated view i am focusing on the next two kicks ahead of the play rather than the play itself. sitting on ground level is difficult to see the other end and the tv only really shows you who has (or is near) the ball.
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
-
Donny
- Posts: 80294
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 6:01 pm
- Location: Toonumbar NSW Australia
- Has liked: 63 times
- Been liked: 27 times
Valid comment, JW, and a good idea.
Although, there are a plethora of stats and opinions which a Nick's member can access before voting if, for example, they went to the game and, by the nature of where they might have been seated, only really saw that part of the ground/play.
(I deleted my original comment about Keeffe v. Swan as it went against the voting guidelines. I also deleted David's comments for the same reason.)
Although, there are a plethora of stats and opinions which a Nick's member can access before voting if, for example, they went to the game and, by the nature of where they might have been seated, only really saw that part of the ground/play.
(I deleted my original comment about Keeffe v. Swan as it went against the voting guidelines. I also deleted David's comments for the same reason.)
Donny.
It's a game. Enjoy it.
It's a game. Enjoy it.
-
Black_White
- Posts: 6990
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2001 8:27 am
What a load of crap.John Wren wrote:david - i was going to reference a comment (which has disappeared) you made in response to donny's questioning of someone putting keeffe ahead of swan.
i think it would be interesting if voters could append their votes with the location of how they watched the game, i.e. tv, bay 33 row d etc. this would give context to their decision making.
i find when i watch from an elevated view i am focusing on the next two kicks ahead of the play rather than the play itself. sitting on ground level is difficult to see the other end and the tv only really shows you who has (or is near) the ball.
So a Nicks member, who we must remember "are all equal", is subject to some kind of moral loading because he/she viewed the game from the Northern Territory?
Stupid, decisive idea. Shocked that a mod is supporting it.
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | -
Donny
- Posts: 80294
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 6:01 pm
- Location: Toonumbar NSW Australia
- Has liked: 63 times
- Been liked: 27 times
Unless that's an attempted pisstake, B_W, it is you displaying the stupidity.Black_White wrote:What a load of crap.John Wren wrote:david - i was going to reference a comment (which has disappeared) you made in response to donny's questioning of someone putting keeffe ahead of swan.
i think it would be interesting if voters could append their votes with the location of how they watched the game, i.e. tv, bay 33 row d etc. this would give context to their decision making.
i find when i watch from an elevated view i am focusing on the next two kicks ahead of the play rather than the play itself. sitting on ground level is difficult to see the other end and the tv only really shows you who has (or is near) the ball.
So a Nicks member, who we must remember "are all equal", is subject to some kind of moral loading because he/she viewed the game from the Northern Territory?
Stupid, decisive idea. Shocked that a mod is supporting it.
JW was alluding to experiencing the game in different ways - radio, TV, at the game etc. - not in different states.
Donny.
It's a game. Enjoy it.
It's a game. Enjoy it.
-
Piethagoras' Theorem
- Posts: 19603
- Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 1:09 pm
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 17 times
-
AN_Inkling
- Posts: 13521
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am
-
daics aka the ruckman
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 10:06 am
- Location: Scoreboard Hill @ Vic Park
- Been liked: 3 times
