This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.
Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
roar wrote:Sounds like Fas should already have a bag. How's Thomas been?
Faz has been playing HB/wing. Yeah, he's had the 3 shots, 2 of them on the run, though. Agree, his kicking has been a little off. Had a heap of it that term, but wasn't always that good with it...
JT has been serviceable. Was one who started to lift in the 2nd half of that quarter. They're nutting us for contested ball and clearances though. Needs a big 2nd half, for his senior prospects and for the team...
Collingwood Crackerjack wrote:Do you think its strange that at a time when our back line was under siege, we didn't throw our potential 10 year KPB into the mix?
Not really. The club said he would play a half. They just didn't tell us which one...
Having said that, we could have badly used his foot skills and height back there in that quarter. We'll get them this term though.
What annoys me more is we're going 6v6 in an undersized back half. Dollies have some dangerous tall timber. Need to try generate a spare to help those boys out a bit...
Collingwood Crackerjack wrote:Do you think its strange that at a time when our back line was under siege, we didn't throw our potential 10 year KPB into the mix?
If you're referring to the Berg, he is not a KPB. Also, I believe they were only planning to play him for the second half. The welfare of our future brownlow medallist is more important than VFL results.
Collingwood Crackerjack wrote:Do you think its strange that at a time when our back line was under siege, we didn't throw our potential 10 year KPB into the mix?
If you're referring to the Berg, he is not a KPB. Also, I believe they were only planning to play him for the second half. The welfare of our future brownlow medallist is more important than VFL results.
Collingwood Crackerjack wrote:Do you think its strange that at a time when our back line was under siege, we didn't throw our potential 10 year KPB into the mix?
If you're referring to the Berg, he is not a KPB. Also, I believe they were only planning to play him for the second half. The welfare of our future brownlow medallist is more important than VFL results.
Well he's playing at fullback
Not much choice there. Not like we have any actual KPB's in the VFL. Marsh is the closest thing to one but he's not playing