The "What do we get for Beams?" thread

All trade and draft talk here thanks..... this means you DTM!!!!

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
GoWoodsmen
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 9:18 am
Location: Australia

Post by GoWoodsmen »

Side By Side Forever
User avatar
BBHS
Posts: 4968
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 3:13 pm
Location: Bellarine
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 5 times

Post by BBHS »

It's just a play.
Brisbane and Daynes manager would have advised him to not attend the Copeland to help push along a trade.

Collingwood selling the other bag of apples
User avatar
King Malta
Posts: 1641
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:05 am
Location: Gettin' Wiggy

Post by King Malta »

User avatar
burnsy17
Posts: 7853
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 1:03 pm

Post by burnsy17 »

The Beams trade will go through, we wont get what we want, but in the end both parties will be satisfied.

We're never going to get pick 4 AND a star.... how on earth does that make sense? If anything, it would more be something like Aish and pick 16 for example, for Beams - but pick 4 and a star? we're not dealing with idiots here... Brissy aren't Freo! :)

My tip is pick 4 and a pick in the low 20's for Beams.
Beware the swooping Magpie.
User avatar
RudeBoy
Posts: 22076
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 1:08 pm
Been liked: 74 times

Post by RudeBoy »

burnsy17 wrote:The Beams trade will go through, we wont get what we want, but in the end both parties will be satisfied.

We're never going to get pick 4 AND a star.... how on earth does that make sense? If anything, it would more be something like Aish and pick 16 for example, for Beams - but pick 4 and a star? we're not dealing with idiots here... Brissy aren't Freo! :)

My tip is pick 4 and a pick in the low 20's for Beams.
I'd take that.....and use the picks on 2 potential young guns.
User avatar
Lazza
Posts: 12836
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2003 7:01 pm
Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia

Post by Lazza »

burnsy17 wrote:The Beams trade will go through, we wont get what we want, but in the end both parties will be satisfied.

We're never going to get pick 4 AND a star.... how on earth does that make sense? If anything, it would more be something like Aish and pick 16 for example, for Beams - but pick 4 and a star? we're not dealing with idiots here... Brissy aren't Freo! :)

My tip is pick 4 and a pick in the low 20's for Beams.
We get reamed on that deal for Beams...... :shock: :evil:

No way bloody known.
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22046
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 3 times

Post by swoop42 »

burnsy17 wrote:The Beams trade will go through, we wont get what we want, but in the end both parties will be satisfied.

We're never going to get pick 4 AND a star.... how on earth does that make sense? If anything, it would more be something like Aish and pick 16 for example, for Beams - but pick 4 and a star? we're not dealing with idiots here... Brissy aren't Freo! :)

My tip is pick 4 and a pick in the low 20's for Beams.
Beams is a star.

Mayes and Aish are just promising kids and nothing more at this stage.

Picks 7 and 14 from the Gold Coast if on offer would probably be better than 4 and 24 especially if Melbourne get pick 3 for Frawley and we don't have access to the "big 4" of the draft.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
jdpie1970
Posts: 96
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2014 11:45 am

Post by jdpie1970 »

Lazza wrote:
burnsy17 wrote:The Beams trade will go through, we wont get what we want, but in the end both parties will be satisfied.

We're never going to get pick 4 AND a star.... how on earth does that make sense? If anything, it would more be something like Aish and pick 16 for example, for Beams - but pick 4 and a star? we're not dealing with idiots here... Brissy aren't Freo! :)

My tip is pick 4 and a pick in the low 20's for Beams.
We get reamed on that deal for Beams...... :shock: :evil:

No way bloody known.

How about this one then ;

PIES -
Gain Pick 4, Redden , Greenwood
Lose - Beams, Pick 29 and Lumumba pick (22 ?)

BRISVEGAS -
Gain - Beams, Pick 29
Lose - Redden, Pick 4, Pick 41

KANGAS -
Gain, (22?), 41
Lose- Greenwood


??
User avatar
Bob Sugar
Posts: 7764
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 2:03 pm
Location: Benalla

Post by Bob Sugar »

We need to stick to our guns, if a suitable deal can't be worked out Beams will remain a Pie.
Defender...........

On the day before the first, Daicos created God.

You like this.
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22046
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 3 times

Post by swoop42 »

Defender wrote:We need to stick to our guns, if a suitable deal can't be worked out Beams will remain a Pie.
I hear what you're saying but I think the ship has sailed in terms of Beams being held to his contract.

Rather lose him now for a bit less than he's worth than lose him for a lot less than he's worth next year.

The club needs to move forward and having Beams moping around the place isn't going to help.

Once the Frawley compensation is announced I think things will start moving for the pies in terms of wheeling and dealing for Lumumba, Beams and possibly Greenwood.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22046
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 3 times

Post by swoop42 »

Well the first piece of the puzzle has now fallen.

What would you prefer Lumumba for pick 23 or Lumumba and pick 5 for pick 2/3?

If Melbourne aren't prepared to drop 2/3 places for Lumumba alone how about this.

Beams and pick 29 for Pick 5, 25 and Merrett.

Pick 5, Lumumba and Merrett for pick 2.

We lose Beams, Lumumba and pick 29 but end up with picks 2 and 25.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
leonmagic
Posts: 3430
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 7:24 pm

Post by leonmagic »

I'm 99% sure you can't on-trade players
User avatar
woftam
Posts: 7436
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 12:16 pm
Location: Carum Downs, Vic

Post by woftam »

I think we have already told them we don't want Merrett or another tall defender. We need mids & I'm pretty sure we have told them so.
User avatar
The Boy Who Cried Wolf
Posts: 4655
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 10:24 am
Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right

Post by The Boy Who Cried Wolf »

swoop42 wrote:Well the first piece of the puzzle has now fallen.

What would you prefer Lumumba for pick 23 or Lumumba and pick 5 for pick 2/3?

If Melbourne aren't prepared to drop 2/3 places for Lumumba alone how about this.

Beams and pick 29 for Pick 5, 25 and Merrett.

Pick 5, Lumumba and Merrett for pick 2.

We lose Beams, Lumumba and pick 29 but end up with picks 2 and 25.
Yep its pick 5 at best now....
All Aboard!! Choo Choo!!!
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22046
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 3 times

Post by swoop42 »

woftam wrote:I think we have already told them we don't want Merrett or another tall defender. We need mids & I'm pretty sure we have told them so.
Of course we don't want Merrett but Melbourne have expressed some interest so I'm throwing up his name as a possible way we can go from pick 5 to 2.

It would have to be a 3 way deal between us, Brisbane and Melbourne.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
Post Reply