The "What do we get for Beams?" thread

All trade and draft talk here thanks..... this means you DTM!!!!

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
MJ23
Posts: 4163
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 8:52 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by MJ23 »

Wokko wrote:Greg Davis reports:

Brisbane : Beams
North : pick 25
Collingwood : Pick 5, Greenwood

I'd take it.
I wouldn't.
Could we not just use our second round pick for Levi or the pick we get from H ?
Brisb should be giving up more or manufacturing a gws player from patfull
"Even when Im old and gray, I wont be able to play but Ill still love the game"
Michael Jordan
User avatar
Fatui Attata
Posts: 707
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 11:47 pm

Post by Fatui Attata »

watt price tully wrote:
swoop42 wrote:
AN_Inkling wrote: Rejected ;).
Personally i think this is a fair trade for all parties and pick 2 shouldn't be sniffed at.

It would either land us Petracca :wink: or give us the option between Brayshaw or McCartin.

Bribane lose pick 5, 25, Merrett
Brisbane gain Beams, pick 34

Melbourne lose pick 2, 34
Melbourne gain pick 5, Lumumba, Merrett

Collingwood lose Beams
Collingwood gain pick 2, 25
I don't think there is enough in it for Brisbane in that scenario - but I like it
Coulda said it "has Merrett"
I'm not the pheasant plucker I'm the pheasant plucker's son, and I'll be plucking pheasants til the pheasant plucker comes! "Try saying that with a mouthful of peanuts!!" Lou Richards
Museman
Posts: 1314
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:36 am

Post by Museman »

Wokko wrote:Greg Davis reports:

Brisbane : Beams
North : pick 25
Collingwood : Pick 5, Greenwood

I'd take it.
Bears get off easy, we did the grind work on Greenwood, tell them to find us another 2nd rnd pick via Merret or Patfull that they can upgrade our 3rd rnd pick with.....

Wouldn't do these ^&$ flogs any favours whatsoever.
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22049
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

Who's Greg Davis?
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
Ev5Magpies
Posts: 967
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Aspendale, Victoria

Post by Ev5Magpies »

Wokko wrote:Greg Davis reports:

Brisbane : Beams
North : pick 25
Collingwood : Pick 5, Greenwood

I'd take it.
No way! We'd get Greenwood without the bears involved. I like the pick 2 & 25 if the dees get involved.

Otherwise GWS option with Treloar, but doubt that'll come off.
Ohhhh the premierships a cakewalk for the good old COLLINGWOOD
User avatar
Az
Posts: 750
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 2:59 pm

Post by Az »

MJ23 wrote:
Wokko wrote:Greg Davis reports:

Brisbane : Beams
North : pick 25
Collingwood : Pick 5, Greenwood

I'd take it.
I wouldn't.
Could we not just use our second round pick for Levi or the pick we get from H ?
Brisb should be giving up more or manufacturing a gws player from patfull
Exactly. Fuq that, we are getting what we sought out for last Friday. We certainly don't need Brisbane's help to get Greenwood. If the Pies end up kneeling to these ass hats, I would have to reconsider my membership for 2015. Not sure how Caro thinks we've reached a deal considering both sides are publicly at odds over the deal as of less than 24 hours ago? Hope that excuse for a journalist has got it right though.
Wokko
Posts: 8764
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:04 pm

Post by Wokko »

Your sentiments seem to come from wanting to screw the Lions rather than trying to get a good deal. if Pick 5 + Redden who wasn't even in Brisbane's B&F top ten would get it done, but pick 5 + Norfs equal 2nd in the B&F wouldn't be enough then something here doesn't add up.
User avatar
Breadcrawl
Posts: 2177
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:33 pm

Post by Breadcrawl »

swoop42 wrote:A pure hypothetical.

Beams, pick*34 to Brisbane.

Pick 5, Lumumba and Merrett to Melbourne.

Pick 2 and 25 to pies.

*Pick received for Mitch Clarke
Two of the likely top 4 are talls.

This means that the third best mid in the draft, at worst, will be available at pick 5.

You can't know that Petracca and Brayshaw are going to be so much better than the next guy that it is worth tipping in what you are suggesting to get pick 2.

It costs Hine another good chance to find a ripping player
Last edited by Breadcrawl on Tue Oct 07, 2014 9:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
they can smell what we're cookin'
Bucks2014
Posts: 407
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2014 10:34 am

Post by Bucks2014 »

Wokko wrote:Greg Davis reports:

Brisbane : Beams
North : pick 25
Collingwood : Pick 5, Greenwood

I'd take it.
Hope Brisbane don't actually think this could get done. It's only a win for them. How do we get a fair deal?

Greenwood for pick 22 from Melbourne for H.

I have faith in the Pies recruiting team, apparently there are 2 other clubs involved, so if Brisbane really want Dayne they best give us a decent player plus pick 5 which should be pick 4.
"Still waiting for your call Caroline ... not a quote in sight. Don't ever presume to speak on Collingwood's behalf,"
User avatar
John Wren
Posts: 24186
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm

Post by John Wren »

swoop42 wrote:Who's Greg Davis?
courier-mail.

http://www.couriermail.com.au/sport/afl ... 3a751a333c
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
User avatar
HAL
Posts: 45105
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:10 pm
Been liked: 3 times
Contact:

Post by HAL »

Wokko wrote:Your sentiments seem to come from wanting to screw the Lions rather than trying to get a good deal. if Pick 5 + Redden who wasn't even in Brisbane's B&F top ten would get it done, but pick 5 + Norfs equal 2nd in the B&F wouldn't be enough then something here doesn't add up.
I bet you say that to everyone.
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22049
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

Wokko wrote:Greg Davis reports:

Brisbane : Beams
North : pick 25
Collingwood : Pick 5, Greenwood

I'd take it.
Link or it didn't happen.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
The Boy Who Cried Wolf
Posts: 4655
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 10:24 am
Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right

Post by The Boy Who Cried Wolf »

swoop42 wrote:
Wokko wrote:Greg Davis reports:

Brisbane : Beams
North : pick 25
Collingwood : Pick 5, Greenwood

I'd take it.
Link or it didn't happen.
JW's post above has it.
All Aboard!! Choo Choo!!!
Wokko
Posts: 8764
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:04 pm

Post by Wokko »

I still don't understand how Redden + 5 is enough but Greenwood + 5 isn't. Why should we use our Pick 22 on Greenwood if we can get him for Brisbane's pick 25 instead of trying to hustle them for a player who might not even want to come here.
User avatar
Neil Appleby
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 1998 11:10 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by Neil Appleby »

warburton lad wrote:Caro was first to break the news of Hird's sacking last week.

Only problem was, he wasn't sacked...
Well actually he was WL, but they got cold feet and changed their minds.
After the epic draw comes the decisive knockout!
Collingwood rules the world again and Mick Malthouse fulfils his destiny with the twenty ten premiership and can you hear the people sing!
Post Reply