The "What do we get for Beams?" thread

All trade and draft talk here thanks..... this means you DTM!!!!

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
4everpies
Posts: 547
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:10 am

Post by 4everpies »

scoobydoo wrote:
piepower wrote:
AN_Inkling wrote:Not a free agent of any sort next year.
Spot on Mate.
Next yr is his 7th yr. arnt you a restricted free agent after 7 yrs
Then unrestricted after 10 yrs
It's not 7 years, it's 8 years.
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

scoobydoo wrote:
piepower wrote:
AN_Inkling wrote:Not a free agent of any sort next year.
Spot on Mate.
Next yr is his 7th yr. arnt you a restricted free agent after 7 yrs
Then unrestricted after 10 yrs
8 years
User avatar
Doc63
Posts: 4558
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 8:58 pm
Location: Newport

Post by Doc63 »

Wokko wrote:1. Stop crapping on about free agency when you have no clue. Beams will never be a free agent, he will either be traded this year while contracted, next year when off contract (for much less) or walk into the draft.

2. If he walks we get 0. This is Ross Lyon style nonsense rather than a Port Adelaide style stand. PA didn't want to gift a premiership rival an A grader, Brisbane and Collingwood are not in this situation.

3. He WILL go to Brissy if he walks for free. They will have to spend their first rounder either in trade to us, or for him in the draft but no other clubs will take him. They will Luke Ball us and we'll look like idiots.

4. 5 + Greenwood is exactly right, whether Brisbane organize that or we do using their pick, or Melbourne's pick isn't relevant. If you're happy with Player X from Brisbane's best 22, then Norths 3rd best player should be enough.

Stop making this about taking Brisbane for all they're worth, it's about the outcome for us, not them.

Stop thinking you're a recruiter and getting sand in your vagina when people say things you don't like. Nobody here has any say in what happens, the clubs aren't reading Nicks to get trade ideas. FFS. :roll:
Finally, some common sense!!! Where do you get off doing that?
I hold a cup of wisdom, but there is nothing within.
User avatar
Bob Sugar
Posts: 7764
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 2:03 pm
Location: Benalla

Post by Bob Sugar »

I'm over this shit, all's I ask is we don't cave.
Defender...........

On the day before the first, Daicos created God.

You like this.
Wokko
Posts: 8764
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:04 pm

Post by Wokko »

Doc63 wrote:
Wokko wrote:1. Stop crapping on about free agency when you have no clue. Beams will never be a free agent, he will either be traded this year while contracted, next year when off contract (for much less) or walk into the draft.

2. If he walks we get 0. This is Ross Lyon style nonsense rather than a Port Adelaide style stand. PA didn't want to gift a premiership rival an A grader, Brisbane and Collingwood are not in this situation.

3. He WILL go to Brissy if he walks for free. They will have to spend their first rounder either in trade to us, or for him in the draft but no other clubs will take him. They will Luke Ball us and we'll look like idiots.

4. 5 + Greenwood is exactly right, whether Brisbane organize that or we do using their pick, or Melbourne's pick isn't relevant. If you're happy with Player X from Brisbane's best 22, then Norths 3rd best player should be enough.

Stop making this about taking Brisbane for all they're worth, it's about the outcome for us, not them.

Stop thinking you're a recruiter and getting sand in your vagina when people say things you don't like. Nobody here has any say in what happens, the clubs aren't reading Nicks to get trade ideas. FFS. :roll:
Finally, some common sense!!! Where do you get off doing that?
Sometimes you just gotta tell it like it is :lol:
User avatar
Doc63
Posts: 4558
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 8:58 pm
Location: Newport

Post by Doc63 »

Defender wrote:I'm over this shit, all's I ask is we don't cave.
I think we all agree we don't want to cave, we just cant agree on what caving in actually is.
I hold a cup of wisdom, but there is nothing within.
User avatar
John Wren
Posts: 24186
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm

Post by John Wren »

4everpies wrote:
scoobydoo wrote:
piepower wrote: Spot on Mate.
Next yr is his 7th yr. arnt you a restricted free agent after 7 yrs
Then unrestricted after 10 yrs
It's not 7 years, it's 8 years.
8 years. there was a mooted change to reduce to seven. not sure if that ever got legislated.
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
AN_Inkling
Posts: 13521
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am

Post by AN_Inkling »

Pick 5 and 25 is caving. It was always the minimum that would be on offer and is unders.
Well done boys!
Wokko
Posts: 8764
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:04 pm

Post by Wokko »

5 + 25 is what we'll take at 4:59pm on Friday if nothing else can be arranged. If that gives you a sad then you better stock up on some beers.

Remember, the players involved in trades have to agree. Has anyone considered that nobody worthwhile (Top 22) from Brisbane actually wants to come here?
AN_Inkling
Posts: 13521
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am

Post by AN_Inkling »

^^As a last minute deal it's adequate at best. Any earlier and we've been weak.
Well done boys!
User avatar
Captain_MyCaptain
Posts: 3070
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 9:20 pm
Location: home

Post by Captain_MyCaptain »

Wokko wrote:1. Stop crapping on about free agency when you have no clue. Beams will never be a free agent, he will either be traded this year while contracted, next year when off contract (for much less) or walk into the draft.

2. If he walks we get 0. This is Ross Lyon style nonsense rather than a Port Adelaide style stand. PA didn't want to gift a premiership rival an A grader, Brisbane and Collingwood are not in this situation.

3. He WILL go to Brissy if he walks for free. They will have to spend their first rounder either in trade to us, or for him in the draft but no other clubs will take him. They will Luke Ball us and we'll look like idiots.

4. 5 + Greenwood is exactly right, whether Brisbane organize that or we do using their pick, or Melbourne's pick isn't relevant. If you're happy with Player X from Brisbane's best 22, then Norths 3rd best player should be enough.

Stop making this about taking Brisbane for all they're worth, it's about the outcome for us, not them.

Stop thinking you're a recruiter and getting sand in your vagina when people say things you don't like. Nobody here has any say in what happens, the clubs aren't reading Nicks to get trade ideas. FFS. :roll:
Greenwood and pick 5.
hmmmmmmmmmmm.
[thinking music]

Ok, it's a deal.
The window is open my friend!
AN_Inkling
Posts: 13521
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am

Post by AN_Inkling »

And please stop this talk of Greenwood being North's 2nd or 3rd best player. We all know that's not true.
Well done boys!
Wokko
Posts: 8764
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:04 pm

Post by Wokko »

He was this year. Whether it's a Woewodin style flash in the pan or a Swanny style coming of age, well only the future can tell us that.
Museman
Posts: 1314
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:36 am

Post by Museman »

Wokko wrote:5 + 25 is what we'll take at 4:59pm on Friday if nothing else can be arranged. If that gives you a sad then you better stock up on some beers.

Remember, the players involved in trades have to agree. Has anyone considered that nobody worthwhile (Top 22) from Brisbane actually wants to come here?
I got some Chinese merchandise up for grabs, only asking slightly overs, you got friends who think like you too????
Domesticated_Ape
Posts: 525
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:27 pm

Post by Domesticated_Ape »

Wokko wrote:1. Stop crapping on about free agency when you have no clue. Beams will never be a free agent, he will either be traded this year while contracted, next year when off contract (for much less) or walk into the draft.

2. If he walks we get 0. This is Ross Lyon style nonsense rather than a Port Adelaide style stand. PA didn't want to gift a premiership rival an A grader, Brisbane and Collingwood are not in this situation.

3. He WILL go to Brissy if he walks for free. They will have to spend their first rounder either in trade to us, or for him in the draft but no other clubs will take him. They will Luke Ball us and we'll look like idiots.

4. 5 + Greenwood is exactly right, whether Brisbane organize that or we do using their pick, or Melbourne's pick isn't relevant. If you're happy with Player X from Brisbane's best 22, then Norths 3rd best player should be enough.

Stop making this about taking Brisbane for all they're worth, it's about the outcome for us, not them.

Stop thinking you're a recruiter and getting sand in your vagina when people say things you don't like. Nobody here has any say in what happens, the clubs aren't reading Nicks to get trade ideas. FFS. :roll:
The problem is that Greenwood isn't North's 3rd best player. He had a good year this year, but that was after 6 pretty average years at the club. Maybe he's a late developer or maybe he's just a one year wonder, it's hard to say right now. That's why most would agree he's only worth a mid second round pick. If "player X from Brisbane" is Aish, Redden or Mayes, then no, you wouldn't be happy with Greenwood instead. The Lions players are all younger and more talented. There's also the fact that we can get Greenwood anyway with either our second rounder or the Lumumba pick.

It's absolutely about an outcome for us. An outcome that would see us add a solid performer like Greenwood and two young highly talented midfielders to our list. If we lose Beams we need that or else we go backwards IMO.
Post Reply