The "What do we get for Beams?" thread

All trade and draft talk here thanks..... this means you DTM!!!!

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22050
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

While we all hope for pick 5 and Aish if Brisbane come back today with a revised offer of 5, 21 and 25 should we accept that and get concentrating on other trade options or reject it and go looking for a better deal that may or may not come?

Picks 5,21 and 25 should essentially end up meaning 5, 21 and Greenwood.

While not as good it's comparable to the Judd deal of 3, 20 and a young Josh Kennedy.

It's a difficult one.

If we have pick 5 as well as 21 up our sleeve we would have more options available to us to when looking to other possible trades or an extra top 25 pick on draft day.

For instance if Hine didn't see much of a gap between 5 and 15 could we look to pass on pick 5 to the Gold Coast in return for pick 15 and someone like Lonergan to add some midfield grunt?

Alternatively we might trade pick 5 to the kangaroos in exchange for Greenwood and pick 16 meaning we would retain 3 selections within the first 25 (not including Moore).

At the end of the day if Brisbane aren't willing to add pick 21 into the mix then reject the offer pies.

Stuff em.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
Albert Parker
Posts: 2573
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:12 pm

Post by Albert Parker »

5 and Aish is a good deal for the Pies.
Aish can play and is a good citizen.
Let's wait and see.
One team, one dream - the Pies and this year's premiership
User avatar
Damien
Posts: 5718
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 1999 8:01 pm
Location: Croydon Vic
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 11 times

Post by Damien »

If it's Aish I hope we've checked on his old mans health and his potential for homesickness 😏

If he leaves in 2 years time I'll blame Bucks!
'Collingwood are the Bradmans of Football'
The Herald - 1930
User avatar
Lone Ranger
Posts: 2419
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 10:19 am
Location: Macedon Ranges
Been liked: 1 time

Post by Lone Ranger »

collie dog wrote:He's not a slave. You can't make a player stay if they don't want to.
Of course you can ... he has a contract.
If you dont honour a contract, you are open to be sued for breach of contract.
User avatar
Breadcrawl
Posts: 2177
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:33 pm

Post by Breadcrawl »

5 and Aish is fair, and is what we have been asking for all along.

If this happened it's a win for us on many fronts.

Aish is like Bucks 2.0 - SANFL glory followed by a 'gap year' QLD holiday, followed by a long and distinguished career at Collingwood.

Hopefully he doesn't have to wait till he takes over as coach for a flag though ;)

Brisbane are going to end up looking stupid.

Love it.
they can smell what we're cookin'
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

Az wrote:Beams isn't a restricted free agent until the end of 2016 so no first round compo next year. Bris will still have to deal with us next year if they want to facilitate a trade without any problems. If not, the only way Beams can get to Bris is if he goes into the draft and they pick him up, of course leaving the window wide open for other clubs to pounce if they dare.

Beams senior ain't going anywhere too soon if he has "beaten the prick of a disease" as Dayne put it himself.
The AFLPA is pushing for RFA to be effective at 7 years, could come into effect in 2015 so a compo pick may well be on the cards... unless the AFL abolish compo picks...
Museman
Posts: 1314
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:36 am

Post by Museman »

Breadcrawl wrote:5 and Aish is fair, and is what we have been asking for all along.

If this happened it's a win for us on many fronts.

Aish is like Bucks 2.0 - SANFL glory followed by a 'gap year' QLD holiday, followed by a long and distinguished career at Collingwood.

Hopefully he doesn't have to wait till he takes over as coach for a flag though ;)

Brisbane are going to end up looking stupid.

Love it.
They will only look stupid because they chose to open their mouths and talk tough in the first place, all they needed to say was we will work hard with Collingwood to facilitate a for Dayne Beams....simple easy, leave your bridges unburnt....

I don't see it happening, they lose to much face if they fold now, Swann, Leppa, Warren, have all stupidly opened their mouths.

5 and Aish is still slightly unders.....

Langdons year was as good as his and we definitely wouldn't be looking to trade him but if a gun came up i'm pretty sure we wouldn't be ruling it out.
MAY-Z
Posts: 253
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:48 pm

Post by MAY-Z »

swoop42 wrote:While we all hope for pick 5 and Aish if Brisbane come back today with a revised offer of 5, 21 and 25 should we accept that and get concentrating on other trade options or reject it and go looking for a better deal that may or may not come?

Picks 5,21 and 25 should essentially end up meaning 5, 21 and Greenwood.

While not as good it's comparable to the Judd deal of 3, 20 and a young Josh Kennedy.

It's a difficult one.

If we have pick 5 as well as 21 up our sleeve we would have more options available to us to when looking to other possible trades or an extra top 25 pick on draft day.

For instance if Hine didn't see much of a gap between 5 and 15 could we look to pass on pick 5 to the Gold Coast in return for pick 15 and someone like Lonergan to add some midfield grunt?

Alternatively we might trade pick 5 to the kangaroos in exchange for Greenwood and pick 16 meaning we would retain 3 selections within the first 25 (not including Moore).

At the end of the day if Brisbane aren't willing to add pick 21 into the mix then reject the offer pies.

Stuff em.
Problem is Brisbane want the 21 for christensen so maybe this is what will have to happen

Collingwood:
Gain: Aish, 5, 25
Lose: Beams, 30

Geelong:
Gain: 21, 30
Lose: Christensen, 35

Brisbane:
Gain: Beams, Christensen, 35
Lose: Aish, 5, 21, 25
AN_Inkling
Posts: 13521
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am

Post by AN_Inkling »

Brisbane still saying they won't trade any young players. Well Leppa is anyway:

https://twitter.com/JLeppitsch
Well done boys!
The-Den
Posts: 258
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 9:06 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by The-Den »

AN_Inkling wrote:Brisbane still saying they won't trade any young players. Well Leppa is anyway:

https://twitter.com/JLeppitsch
How is his last tweet, very cocky. If we roll over and accept their deal I'll dead set be filthy. Pick 5 and a player nothing else.
User avatar
Deja Vu
Posts: 4411
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 10:44 am

Post by Deja Vu »

Seriously Leppa can get $@&^#.

No player, no deal. Try again next year in the draft if he's not playing for GWS
User avatar
Fatui Attata
Posts: 707
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 11:47 pm

Post by Fatui Attata »

I'm not the pheasant plucker I'm the pheasant plucker's son, and I'll be plucking pheasants til the pheasant plucker comes! "Try saying that with a mouthful of peanuts!!" Lou Richards
User avatar
PIES4LYF
Posts: 527
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:46 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by PIES4LYF »

It's confirmed Leppa is a absolute f***wit. How does he expect to get something without giving something up. i think Beams must go. You can't have players not wanting to be there. It's a cancer for the group. Get Gold Coast involved now!
PIES IN 2015
User avatar
mattdally
Posts: 1479
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 10 times
Contact:

Post by mattdally »

Agree. Leppa is useless as a coach and acting like a knob.
Let's get GWS to the table.
Pick 4 and Pick 7* (acquired from Blues) and we sign up.

Thanks
User avatar
Damien
Posts: 5718
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 1999 8:01 pm
Location: Croydon Vic
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 11 times

Post by Damien »

Leppa is an AFL coach for one reason and one reason only: cos an incompetent administration sacked Vos cos they thought they had Paul Roos over the line.... But I digress.
'Collingwood are the Bradmans of Football'
The Herald - 1930
Post Reply