Welcome to Collingwood Matthew Goodyear

All trade and draft talk here thanks..... this means you DTM!!!!

Moderator: bbmods

perthmagpie
Posts: 4373
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 10:11 am
Location: Yarrawonga

Post by perthmagpie »

I nominate 'Wozza' as was a...
Magpies love pies(Lol)
User avatar
gurugeoff
Posts: 831
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 3:50 pm
Been liked: 8 times

Post by gurugeoff »

i know that highlights tapes aren't going to put in lots of bloopers, but from what we can see, he is very composed with the ball and hits his targets. He is also quite elusive and fast.
User avatar
dalyc
Posts: 2883
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 8:58 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 12 times

Post by dalyc »

gurugeoff wrote:i know that highlights tapes aren't going to put in lots of bloopers, but from what we can see, he is very composed with the ball and hits his targets. He is also quite elusive and fast.
Agree ... though also doesn't seem to have a left foot kick.
Four legged animals good, two legged animals better
User avatar
gurugeoff
Posts: 831
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 3:50 pm
Been liked: 8 times

Post by gurugeoff »

yeh, noticed that too
User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29542
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 271 times
Been liked: 349 times

Post by Jezza »

I watched Hine's wrap-up of the draft and he said Goodyear's got excellent pace about him, but I think the recruiters know that his kicking needs improvement but he has a lot of potential to make it.
🏆 | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | 🏆
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54840
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 131 times
Been liked: 166 times

Post by stui magpie »

WhyPhilWhy? wrote:I nominate "2010" as a nickname
I nominate "Gunnabeya" (Gonna be a) Gunner for short.
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22050
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

Now that I've settled down and got over the fact the draft didn't go exactly how I planned :wink: I must say I don't mind the look of this kid at all.

Certainly has a skill set that we require in speed and endurance and hell he even averaged more ball per week at TAC level than any of De Goey, Laverde or Langford so he knows how to find it.

Now to develop and improve what he does with it.

You don't finish 2nd in a clubs best and fairest without talent that's for sure.

It's pick 48 so at this range it's always going to be hit and miss when it comes to players being able to make the grade at AFL level.

Welcome to Collingwood Matthew and best of luck.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22050
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

This post was taken from bigfooty:

Believe me when I say we've done well with all three mids, but Goodyear has the most upside in my opinion, particularly with a lighter and more athletic frame than our other two boys. Having seen Calder on a number of occasions this year I wouldn't be surprised if we talking in my about Goodyear in more revered terms than the other two in a few years time.
Firstly lets put the Cavka myth to bed. Cavka mainly played half forward this year for Cannons not midfield, Goodyear leaves him for dead as a mid boasting top ten stats in the TAC in contested possession, clearances and hard ball gets- better stats across the board than De Goey and Maynard. His Vic Metro stats weren't as impressive but im led to believe he battled through injuries and illness during the carnival. My inside word tells me is when they compared Cavka and Goodyear, Derek weighed up athlete vs pure footballer (thank god we took a footballer). On top that he has elite speed and endurance (nowhere near Cavkas endurance, but no one in the draft was).
His kicking is not all doom and gloom, Goodyear and Touk Miller seemed to be the go to players for Calder this year and Goodyear often won that first possession/clearance under pressure- that style of game will always impact on kicking efficiency. His technique is sound although his low flat kicks need a little work. When you look at his videos he can hit targets effectively when he has time and space. His biggest issue is decision making and composure when running at top speed with the ball-our boys will fix this and I believe the recruiters knew that that this wasn't a major concern. Ive looked at the draft a few times (yes I'm a pies tragic) and Hines didnt hesitate when he called Goodyears name out-they never had Cavka earmarked for that pick, Goodyear is who they wanted.
I also hear his onfield leadership is impeccable. This boy was in the best in 10 games including all finals in the second best team (best during the h&a season ) in the best u18 comp in the land.
What his vids dont show is his defensive game which is outstanding-he averages nearly 2 more tackles a game than De Goey and works extremely hard both ways, which is what we need at the pies.
Ponder these stats fellow pies tragics and start to get excited because weve picked up a steal. Im throwing in the highly touted no.3 pick and disposal efficiency king (???) Angus Brayshaw as a interesting comparison with our 3 boys.
TAC averages
contested possession
Mayn 9.1
De Goe 6.9
Goody 12.3
Brayshaw 11.5
Disposal efficiency
May 65.3%
De goe 69 %
Good 61 %
Brayshaw 57.8%
Average possessions
Mayn 21.9
De goey 15.1 (this worries me a bit)
Goody 23.3
Brayshaw 23.5
Tackles
Mayn 5.9 (love that)
De goe 2.8
Goody 4.4
Brayshaw 6

We need to take a deep breath, look at the facts and give this boy an opportunity to develop because I believe we have what they call in the industry a 'hidden gem'. I will not be surprised if we have another Swanny (big call I know-but both from Calder, Goodyear pick 48, Swanny 58) on our hands!!!
Welcome to our GREAT club Matthew Goodyear!!!!

I can't vouch for all the stats as 100% accurate but it's interesting reading nonetheless.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22050
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/leader/nort ... 7124553191

Boy this kid is growing on me.

Cavka who?

LOL.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
duggieboy
Posts: 592
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:08 pm
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 3 times

Post by duggieboy »

^^ Pretty interesting stats there. Thanks for posting this. Its hard not to like the upside here. Feeling much better about our picks.

:D
User avatar
RudeBoy
Posts: 22170
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:08 pm
Been liked: 148 times

Post by RudeBoy »

Thanks for posting that BF stuff swoop. I'm liking this kid more and more. Reckon all he needs is a few more kilos - like about 10 - and he'll be right to go. :)
User avatar
tommo
Posts: 773
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 2:21 pm

Post by tommo »

Bit of Barlow about him IMO
Black and White - Through and Through - Side by Side - Us against Them
User avatar
Damien
Posts: 5718
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 1999 8:01 pm
Location: Croydon Vic
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 11 times

Post by Damien »

Highlights are just that - highlights. But I certainly didn't see any butchering of the ball there. I saw precision and picking the right option. I'm impressed.
'Collingwood are the Bradmans of Football'
The Herald - 1930
Wokko
Posts: 8764
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:04 pm

Post by Wokko »

If it only saves you once a year... It's a Goodyear.

Hope he kicks a goal after the siren and we can use that one.
User avatar
MJ23
Posts: 4163
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 8:52 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by MJ23 »

swoop42 wrote:This post was taken from bigfooty:

Believe me when I say we've done well with all three mids, but Goodyear has the most upside in my opinion, particularly with a lighter and more athletic frame than our other two boys. Having seen Calder on a number of occasions this year I wouldn't be surprised if we talking in my about Goodyear in more revered terms than the other two in a few years time.
Firstly lets put the Cavka myth to bed. Cavka mainly played half forward this year for Cannons not midfield, Goodyear leaves him for dead as a mid boasting top ten stats in the TAC in contested possession, clearances and hard ball gets- better stats across the board than De Goey and Maynard. His Vic Metro stats weren't as impressive but im led to believe he battled through injuries and illness during the carnival. My inside word tells me is when they compared Cavka and Goodyear, Derek weighed up athlete vs pure footballer (thank god we took a footballer). On top that he has elite speed and endurance (nowhere near Cavkas endurance, but no one in the draft was).
His kicking is not all doom and gloom, Goodyear and Touk Miller seemed to be the go to players for Calder this year and Goodyear often won that first possession/clearance under pressure- that style of game will always impact on kicking efficiency. His technique is sound although his low flat kicks need a little work. When you look at his videos he can hit targets effectively when he has time and space. His biggest issue is decision making and composure when running at top speed with the ball-our boys will fix this and I believe the recruiters knew that that this wasn't a major concern. Ive looked at the draft a few times (yes I'm a pies tragic) and Hines didnt hesitate when he called Goodyears name out-they never had Cavka earmarked for that pick, Goodyear is who they wanted.
I also hear his onfield leadership is impeccable. This boy was in the best in 10 games including all finals in the second best team (best during the h&a season ) in the best u18 comp in the land.
What his vids dont show is his defensive game which is outstanding-he averages nearly 2 more tackles a game than De Goey and works extremely hard both ways, which is what we need at the pies.
Ponder these stats fellow pies tragics and start to get excited because weve picked up a steal. Im throwing in the highly touted no.3 pick and disposal efficiency king (???) Angus Brayshaw as a interesting comparison with our 3 boys.
TAC averages
contested possession
Mayn 9.1
De Goe 6.9
Goody 12.3
Brayshaw 11.5
Disposal efficiency
May 65.3%
De goe 69 %
Good 61 %
Brayshaw 57.8%
Average possessions
Mayn 21.9
De goey 15.1 (thvis worries me a bit)
Goody 23.3
Brayshaw 23.5
Tackles
Mayn 5.9 (love that)
De goe 2.8
Goody 4.4
Brayshaw 6

We need to take a deep breath, look at the facts and give this boy an opportunity to develop because I believe we have what they call in the industry a 'hidden gem'. I will not be surprised if we have another Swanny (big call I know-but both from Calder, Goodyear pick 48, Swanny 58) on our hands!!!
Welcome to our GREAT club Matthew Goodyear!!!!

I can't vouch for all the stats as 100% accurate but it's interesting reading nonetheless.
The average possession stats for DeGoey is a bit misleading or misunderstood. He spent a majority of his time in the forward line as opposed to the pure on-ballers. When he did go through the middle he was able to accumulate both contested and uncontested footy.
Like Beams and sidey he will start forward and progress through the midfield. Unlike them both though he is a much better forward and in particular overhead mark.
"Even when Im old and gray, I wont be able to play but Ill still love the game"
Michael Jordan
Post Reply