Trading Witts

This is a Collingwood Bulletin Board - use this forum for general, Pies-related topics. For other footy topics, use Nick's Other AFL forum, and for non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar. For non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.

Moderator: bbmods

User avatar
John Wren
Posts: 24186
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm

Post by John Wren »

jg22 wrote:I'd like to trade for Carlisle from Essendon. Gun defender who is lost playing up forward. Just what we need to add real steel to our back six. And yep, I'd trade Witts for him.
purely from a trade perspective - rather than what should happen - that's not a bad trade. they are in need of a ruckman who will carry them through the next few years.
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
Bucks2014
Posts: 407
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2014 10:34 am

Post by Bucks2014 »

Trying to come up with one reason why we should do this, nothing is coming to mind. Let's see, he is 209cms has been playing footy for approx 6 years only played under 16's to keep fit for rugby.

We have put approx 4 years of development into him only to trade away and have another side be rewarded in a couple of years time.

We have already lost one over 200cms, there are a few who post we recruit midgets and when we have one of the tallest players playing AFL we want to get rid of him.

Certainly hope this doesn't happen, he is only 22. Think we expect too much at times.
"Still waiting for your call Caroline ... not a quote in sight. Don't ever presume to speak on Collingwood's behalf,"
User avatar
Dangles
Posts: 1347
Joined: Thu May 14, 2015 5:13 am

Post by Dangles »

Betcha glad we've got two number one ruckmen now. :P
Otherwise we'd have Gault and White taking on Mumford tomorrow. Or worse still Cox. :shock:
neil
Posts: 5083
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 12:56 pm
Location: Queensland
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 30 times

Post by neil »

Dangles wrote:Betcha glad we've got two number one ruckmen now. :P
Otherwise we'd have Gault and White taking on Mumford tomorrow. Or worse still Cox. :shock:
The exact reason given for keeping him
Carlscum 120 years being cheating scum
User avatar
RudeBoy
Posts: 22169
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:08 pm
Been liked: 146 times

Post by RudeBoy »

Witts aint going anywhere.
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22049
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

Not that I'm advocating it but if we traded Witts then we'd replace him with the best option we could land later in the draft or via a low cost trade.

We aren't that short sighted.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
cressyg
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 10:10 pm

Post by cressyg »

Geez...Isn't it lucky we have Witts to fill in for Grundy for the next 3 weeks
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 45001
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 21 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

I am Da Man
User avatar
Bob Sugar
Posts: 7764
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:03 pm
Location: Benalla

Post by Bob Sugar »

If both become elite in the next few years we'll be forced to trade one, you don't want to spend 12% or so of your cap on 2 rucks, the best formula is one elite ruck and a workhorse, then 1 or 2 versatile KP players who can pinch hit.

The only way I'd keep both on big coin is if one (or both) started hitting the scoreboard while resting forward, 30 goals +.
Defender...........

On the day before the first, Daicos created God.

You like this.
User avatar
Dangles
Posts: 1347
Joined: Thu May 14, 2015 5:13 am

Post by Dangles »

Defender wrote:
The only way I'd keep both on big coin is if one (or both) started hitting the scoreboard while resting forward, 30 goals +.
I think either of them could get to that level.
User avatar
HAL
Posts: 45105
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:10 pm
Been liked: 3 times
Contact:

Post by HAL »

And if one or started hitting the scoreboard while resting 30 goals + is [quoteDefender]

The way he or she'd keep on big coin.
User avatar
Dangles
Posts: 1347
Joined: Thu May 14, 2015 5:13 am

Post by Dangles »

HAL wrote:And if one or started hitting the scoreboard while resting 30 goals + is [quoteDefender]

The way he or she'd keep on big coin.
Yes. If they could kick 30+ while resting in the forward line they'd deserve big coin.
DT
Posts: 1110
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 8:20 am
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 6 times

Post by DT »

Daicos, impossible angle ... Goal!
AN_Inkling
Posts: 13521
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am

Post by AN_Inkling »

Trading Witts is not at all idiotic - except maybe in the sense of trading him before he's reached his potential - he's one of the most tradeable pieces of value we have.

Witts is potentially elite. However, you only need one first ruck in your best 22. Grundy is certain to be elite and at this stage is our number 1 prospect. Can we move forward with two elite rucks and play them both? Sure, that could work. So far it hasn't very well but both players are still developing. Alternatively, we could decide that moving Witts for a player who better fills a need (tall forward, classy mid) makes more sense. Then we get a low cost backup ruck to have in reserve.

Dealing Witts isn't something that has to happen. It's not idiotic though and could make a lot of sense for the right deal. I wouldn't call dealing Witts for Treloar crazy for instance.
Well done boys!
User avatar
Johnno75
Posts: 4932
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 9:29 am
Location: Wantirna
Been liked: 47 times

Post by Johnno75 »

I think we can safely put this thread to bed.
Human behavioural studies suggest people who use a lot of swear words tend to be more honest & trustworthy.
Post Reply