Vale #42 Darren Millane (1965-1991)

Player President threads here thanks.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
Culprit
Posts: 17242
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Port Melbourne
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 68 times

Post by Culprit »

The #42 should be back on the field.
User avatar
Magpie Jack
Posts: 1965
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 5:41 am
Location: Bribie Island, on the Collingwood Coast

Post by Magpie Jack »

Thanks Joffa, hard to believe it was 25 years ago. Whenever I hear or read anything that mentions Noble Park my brain goes straight to Darren Millane. Hope his Mum Denise and the rest of the Millane family are well.
Bob Rose....the measuring stick of humanity
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34883
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 132 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

Great player. Probably in the top 5 in that 1990 team.
User avatar
John Wren
Posts: 24186
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm

Post by John Wren »

Culprit wrote:The #42 should be back on the field.
absolutely. it's time.
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
User avatar
CarringbushCigar
Posts: 2959
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:44 am
Location: wherever I lay my beanie
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 7 times

Post by CarringbushCigar »

Happy it being indefinitely retired but if u were going to give it to a kid probably not many better timely opportunities than Callum Brown ?
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34883
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 132 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

Perhaps Brown could have his father's number? He was one of the greatest players ever to take the field for Collingwood and the number really should be vacant next year.
User avatar
1892_
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2015 4:47 pm

Post by 1892_ »

John Wren wrote:
Culprit wrote:The #42 should be back on the field.
absolutely. it's time.
Two options if it's to be returned. Make it the captains number, (how good would it be seeing the number 42 accepting the premiership cup) or alternatively hand the honour to the Darren Millane Perpetual Memorial Trophy winner each season.
User avatar
Cam
Posts: 15355
Joined: Fri May 10, 2002 6:01 pm
Location: Springvale
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 28 times

Post by Cam »

John Wren wrote:
Culprit wrote:The #42 should be back on the field.
absolutely. it's time.
Those that saw him will never forget, but if his number ain't out there many will never know...
Get back on top.
User avatar
Piesnchess
Posts: 26202
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
Has liked: 229 times
Been liked: 94 times

Post by Piesnchess »

Culprit wrote:The #42 should be back on the field.
I agree, its up to his family, but I think its time to bring back No. 42. Hawthorn lost peter crimmins tragically, rested his number for about ten years, now Mitchell wears it. If I was one of his family I would love to see his number back on the field in black and white, and if there is some form of an afterlife, I reckon Pants would want it back on the field too. :idea:
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
User avatar
stui magpie
Posts: 54840
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
Location: In flagrante delicto
Has liked: 131 times
Been liked: 166 times

Post by stui magpie »

Retiring numbers forever or doing what we currently do giving no 35 to the first draft pick for a year is bullshit.

Put them both back, choose kids who can live up to the number and let them make their own history in it.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
User avatar
piedys
Posts: 13425
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 9:49 pm
Location: Gold Coast Asylum
Has liked: 371 times
Been liked: 101 times

Post by piedys »

Pies4shaw wrote:Great player. Probably in the top 5 in that 1990 team.
Lol! He was the architect that intimidated and put the shits through most of the teams we played that year. Make no mistake, he was the key, and Daicos and co simply iced the cake.
The only blokes who even remotely gave him a decent contest were Dipper and Greg Anderson.
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever
User avatar
John Wren
Posts: 24186
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm

Post by John Wren »

stui magpie wrote:Retiring numbers forever or doing what we currently do giving no 35 to the first draft pick for a year is bullshit.

Put them both back, choose kids who can live up to the number and let them make their own history in it.
the sentiment was admirable but agree that the application of it is rubbish.
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
User avatar
piedys
Posts: 13425
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 9:49 pm
Location: Gold Coast Asylum
Has liked: 371 times
Been liked: 101 times

Post by piedys »

John Wren wrote:
stui magpie wrote:Retiring numbers forever or doing what we currently do giving no 35 to the first draft pick for a year is bullshit.

Put them both back, choose kids who can live up to the number and let them make their own history in it.
the sentiment was admirable but agree that the application of it is rubbish.
Okay, let's just give #42 to one of our plethora of elite ball slaughterers and be done with it then?
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever
User avatar
HAL
Posts: 45105
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:10 pm
Been liked: 3 times
Contact:

Post by HAL »

OK I will put it there.
User avatar
John Wren
Posts: 24186
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:28 pm

Post by John Wren »

piedys wrote:
John Wren wrote:
stui magpie wrote:Retiring numbers forever or doing what we currently do giving no 35 to the first draft pick for a year is bullshit.

Put them both back, choose kids who can live up to the number and let them make their own history in it.
the sentiment was admirable but agree that the application of it is rubbish.
Okay, let's just give #42 to one of our plethora of elite ball slaughterers and be done with it then?
we're talking about the #35. besides, your premise is stupid.

on the #42, it's been 25 years. time to bring the number back into circulation.
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
Post Reply