The Toby Greene saga
Moderator: bbmods
I'll be staggered if he doesn't get off. There is no evidence of any injury, or even hurt to the Lions player. He got straight up and played on, without even rubbing his face.
Sure, Greene rubbed his fingers over the player's face, but I can't see what actual offence he committed, given that the players eyes were not actually gauged.
He's a nasty little prick, and clearly something of a sick puppy, but I don't think there's a rule against that.
Wish he played for the Pies.
Sure, Greene rubbed his fingers over the player's face, but I can't see what actual offence he committed, given that the players eyes were not actually gauged.
He's a nasty little prick, and clearly something of a sick puppy, but I don't think there's a rule against that.
Wish he played for the Pies.
-
- Posts: 2096
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:54 pm
- Location: Melbourne
^
"GWS will argue there's no difference between what occurred this week to last so the consequence should be the same. "
The tribunal has no formal knowledge of what happened last week because no evidence was put to it. No video, no witnesses. The tribunal received a guilty plea from Toby Greene and the AFL barrister did not press for a sanction except a fine.
This time video evidence will be put to the tribunal. So they will consider his alleged inappropriate hand actions (for the first time).
"GWS will argue there's no difference between what occurred this week to last so the consequence should be the same. "
The tribunal has no formal knowledge of what happened last week because no evidence was put to it. No video, no witnesses. The tribunal received a guilty plea from Toby Greene and the AFL barrister did not press for a sanction except a fine.
This time video evidence will be put to the tribunal. So they will consider his alleged inappropriate hand actions (for the first time).
- 3rd degree
- Posts: 14200
- Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 12:50 pm
- Location: John Wren's tote
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 2096
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:54 pm
- Location: Melbourne
Live text stream from the AFL website from 5:30pm.ANNODAM wrote:What time are we expected to hear the decision?
If it gets complicated might be a few hours before a verdict comes down.
https://www.afl.com.au/news/2019-09-17/ ... 530pm-aest
I thought infringed players were no longer invited to give evidence because it was generally seen as being a waste of time due to the players code.
The tribunal hearing was even more of a complete farce last week now if Bontempelli could have been requested to appear (he may have stuck to the players code anyway but privately the Bulldogs were said to be fuming at his treatment).
As it is the AFL fixed the result from the beginning in only seeking a fine when a suspension should have been the starting point that could be argued down.
The tribunal hearing was even more of a complete farce last week now if Bontempelli could have been requested to appear (he may have stuck to the players code anyway but privately the Bulldogs were said to be fuming at his treatment).
As it is the AFL fixed the result from the beginning in only seeking a fine when a suspension should have been the starting point that could be argued down.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
- 3rd degree
- Posts: 14200
- Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 12:50 pm
- Location: John Wren's tote
- Contact:
- What'sinaname
- Posts: 20133
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Living rent free
- Has liked: 8 times
- Been liked: 34 times