The Toby Greene saga
Moderator: bbmods
-
- Posts: 13521
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am
That's great!!! You need new evidence for an appeal.Woods wrote:Just in: "The Giants left the door ajar for a possible appeal as they left the tribunal."Cam wrote:Yeah nah, that IS wild speculation. ...Woods wrote:Question now is if GWS take it to the Supreme Court seeking and injunction (and considering the GF is in the offering it is not a wild speculation), which Supreme Court does it go to?
The offence was committed in Qld, GWS and Greene are based in NSW, and the AFL is based in Vic. Go figure.
https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/sport/ ... 52sbe.html
Meanwhile, it's already Tuesday and if they let this distract them for another day or two that will be even better.
- MagpiesTheGreat
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2014 9:56 am
- Magpietothemax
- Posts: 8024
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 11:05 pm
- Has liked: 26 times
- Been liked: 31 times
I don't understand how they possibly think there is any tenable case, even based on Neale's evidence. Neale's evidence, (given despite the code of "say nothing") was that contact was made to his nose, which was sore after. (This despite the fact that Neale was seen to stand up after the incident rubbing his eyes, not his nose). Even if one were to accept Neale's testimony as true, the bridge of the nose is still well within the "eye region". Therefore, one cannot claim that there is "no evidence" that Green made contact with the eye region.
Morevoer, Green's charge did encompass the concept of disreputable/unacceptable conduct, which certainly corresponds to any facial contact whatsoever with a player pinned to the ground.
I can't see how any challenge could possibly succeed.
But I love watching them go for it, because:
a) it is very distracting and disorientating for them (cf: Westcoast's performance after the Rioli incident)
b) They must be very worried, if they are considering going to such lengths.
Morevoer, Green's charge did encompass the concept of disreputable/unacceptable conduct, which certainly corresponds to any facial contact whatsoever with a player pinned to the ground.
I can't see how any challenge could possibly succeed.
But I love watching them go for it, because:
a) it is very distracting and disorientating for them (cf: Westcoast's performance after the Rioli incident)
b) They must be very worried, if they are considering going to such lengths.
Free Julian Assange!!
Ice in the veins
Ice in the veins
- 3rd degree
- Posts: 14200
- Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 12:50 pm
- Location: John Wren's tote
- Contact:
- Magpietothemax
- Posts: 8024
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 11:05 pm
- Has liked: 26 times
- Been liked: 31 times
- Clifton Hill-Billy
- Posts: 1247
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 5:50 pm
- Location: 3068----> 3076
- Been liked: 10 times
It may be unjust, but last week the tribunal handed out the most unjust penalty for behaviour that should have attracted a suspension that should have seen Greene on the sidelines until next year!
Anyway let them have the mental distraction of an appeal and let's focus on our game and how to beat them.
Anyway let them have the mental distraction of an appeal and let's focus on our game and how to beat them.
"Hey Ma get off the dang roof!"
Suck it, Midgets. Got what he deserved. And who's the "AFL legend" claiming it's the "most unjust" suspension in footy history?
Last edited by Mr Miyagi on Tue Sep 17, 2019 8:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.