This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.
Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
This is a Collingwood Bulletin Board - use this forum for general, Pies-related topics. For other footy topics, use Nick's Other AFL forum, and for non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar. For non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.
MatthewBoydFanClub wrote:It's as you say. You can't just call a meeting and hope someone comes forward and nominates. You need to have an opposing ticket to challenge the existing board. Or if you're happy with the current president but not happy with some current members of the board (the most recent one comes to mind) you can nominate those board members you wish to challenge with your own nominees. Some caution here, the financials of AFL footy clubs are very complicated. You don't want to have a clean sweep with all new board members being appointed and no one experienced in finance to handle the financials of the club. This is what happened in the 1980's. If people are unhappy with Mark Korda I really only see three possible alternatives - Jeff Browne, Peter Murphy or Craig Kelly. Also for stability on the board you need to have some continuity of existing board members to continue serving. The two to come to mind are Licuria and Christine Holgate. Not every serving board member needs to be a business person.
Very sensible post, particularly with this part of your post:
"You can't just call a meeting and hope someone comes forward and nominates. You need to have an opposing ticket to challenge the existing board."
I'm not against an EGM, but I just think diving in head first without a clear path is fraught with danger, especially if certain parties don't come to the table as some anticipate.
Jezza wrote:What happens if no one challenges the current board at the EGM?
Theoretically, O'Donnell's appointment could be ratified then and there rather than at the AGM early next year.
Although a possibility, I very much doubt that would happen considering the vocal support for change by ex players and “influential” coterie members.
TBH, this is playing out perfectly for the Jeff Browne camp. He will ride in on the coattails of the members forcing the EGM allowing him a clean start with even more importantly, clean hands.
Browne's silence concerns me. If he doesn't emerge soon and announce the challenge, this could get messy.
If he does challenge then the EGM will be worth the effort and the petition won't be for nothing.
Browne is too smart to be making a challenge publicly before an EGM is called.
He will wait for this petition to do the “dirty work” otherwise he will no doubt nominate at the AGM which would be a smoother political manoeuvre.
I have just finished watching the Offsiders program from yesterday.
My goodness. The gulf between the Club and the members writ large.
If ever there was a reason why we need an election, that “interview” was it.
Our newest non-voting board member unable to convincingly answer what she/the Club knew before her appointment, despite being delivered a soft half volley and despite referring to her pre-prepared, rehearsed talking points.
MatthewBoydFanClub wrote:It's as you say. You can't just call a meeting and hope someone comes forward and nominates. You need to have an opposing ticket to challenge the existing board. Or if you're happy with the current president but not happy with some current members of the board (the most recent one comes to mind) you can nominate those board members you wish to challenge with your own nominees. Some caution here, the financials of AFL footy clubs are very complicated. You don't want to have a clean sweep with all new board members being appointed and no one experienced in finance to handle the financials of the club. This is what happened in the 1980's. If people are unhappy with Mark Korda I really only see three possible alternatives - Jeff Browne, Peter Murphy or Craig Kelly. Also for stability on the board you need to have some continuity of existing board members to continue serving. The two to come to mind are Licuria and Christine Holgate. Not every serving board member needs to be a business person.
Very sensible post, particularly with this part of your post:
"You can't just call a meeting and hope someone comes forward and nominates. You need to have an opposing ticket to challenge the existing board."
I'm not against an EGM, but I just think diving in head first without a clear path is fraught with danger, especially if certain parties don't come to the table as some anticipate.
Here's the Moore interview Swoop posted in the Buckley poll thread:
88MPH wrote:I have just finished watching the Offsiders program from yesterday.
My goodness. The gulf between the Club and the members writ large.
If ever there was a reason why we need an election, that “interview” was it.
Our newest non-voting board member unable to convincingly answer what she/the Club knew before her appointment, despite being delivered a soft half volley and despite referring to her pre-prepared, rehearsed talking points.
Can’t wait for this EGM.
It was an incredibly poor, bizarre performance, and just exactly why the ABC would choose to give her a run beggars belief
Once the petition is served and an EGM is called Browne needs to declare his intentions, which I sincerely hope includes his pursuit of Clarkson from Hawthorn. This will make it clear for Bucks that this is his swan song and paves the way for an easy exit for Clarko and entrance for Mitchell at Hawthorn.
'Collingwood are the Bradmans of Football'
The Herald - 1930
Jezza wrote:What happens if no one challenges the current board at the EGM?
Theoretically, O'Donnell's appointment could be ratified then and there rather than at the AGM early next year.
If no-one else stands, then I certainly will. Just so people get to exercise a choice.
You should totally do it. I’m not a member and never have been, but I’d sign up just to vote for you!
Thanks David. I wouldn't stand a chance of being elected, because I'd be up against the full incumbent machine, however, as a matter of principle I think our members should be given a choice.
By the way, I know categorically that our latest Board member is actually a Tiger supporter. Phuck me. No, phuck them.
Damien wrote:Once the petition is served and an EGM is called Browne needs to declare his intentions, which I sincerely hope includes his pursuit of Clarkson from Hawthorn. This will make it clear for Bucks that this is his swan song and paves the way for an easy exit for Clarko and entrance for Mitchell at Hawthorn.
Damien wrote:Once the petition is served and an EGM is called Browne needs to declare his intentions, which I sincerely hope includes his pursuit of Clarkson from Hawthorn. This will make it clear for Bucks that this is his swan song and paves the way for an easy exit for Clarko and entrance for Mitchell at Hawthorn.
Damien wrote:Once the petition is served and an EGM is called Browne needs to declare his intentions, which I sincerely hope includes his pursuit of Clarkson from Hawthorn. This will make it clear for Bucks that this is his swan song and paves the way for an easy exit for Clarko and entrance for Mitchell at Hawthorn.
Would you oppose Collingwood signing Mitchell?
If Clarkson stays you’d have to look at it.
Personally I’d love Chocco Williams but he’s too much of a lo9se cannon
'Collingwood are the Bradmans of Football'
The Herald - 1930