On the TV it was a behind just the way the angle was and was floating towards the behind area.
Nothing to do with Lynchs reaction at all.
That goal umpire should not have umpired it at all.
And should have gone upstairs asap.
Goal ump was out of position as well.
Looked a point and that what it was.
Lynch sprayed it the way it looked.
Lions won tigers lost that all that matters.
2022 Finals series
Moderator: bbmods
-
buzzlightyear
- Posts: 633
- Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 5:41 am
Played out of position in the ruck when McInerney was subbed out. Was pretty comprehensively beaten by Nankervis imo, which is not unexpected.Donny wrote:Thoughts on Daniel McStay ?Donny wrote:AF points: Nankervis 123, McCluggage 118, McStay 111, Neale 107 (39 disposals).
Still not convinced from what I have seen this year. Not sure if they are looking at playing him forward or back, assuming the rumours are all true!
Buzz
Looking for sweet 16.....
Looking for sweet 16.....
-
buzzlightyear
- Posts: 633
- Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 5:41 am
-
Magpietothemax
- Posts: 8024
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 11:05 pm
- Has liked: 26 times
- Been liked: 31 times
-
Magpietothemax
- Posts: 8024
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 11:05 pm
- Has liked: 26 times
- Been liked: 31 times
Good call, 90. Umpire should have immediately called for a review, then there would have been none of the controversy generated by his initial incorrect call.90 nice wrote:On the TV it was a behind just the way the angle was and was floating towards the behind area.
Nothing to do with Lynchs reaction at all.
That goal umpire should not have umpired it at all.
And should have gone upstairs asap.
Goal ump was out of position as well.
Looked a point and that what it was.
Lynch sprayed it the way it looked.
Lions won tigers lost that all that matters.
Free Julian Assange!!
Ice in the veins
Ice in the veins
-
Magpietothemax
- Posts: 8024
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 11:05 pm
- Has liked: 26 times
- Been liked: 31 times
-
Magpietothemax
- Posts: 8024
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 11:05 pm
- Has liked: 26 times
- Been liked: 31 times
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | -
What'sinaname
- Posts: 20132
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Living rent free
- Has liked: 8 times
- Been liked: 34 times
-
eddiesmith
- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:21 am
- Location: Lexus Centre
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 24 times
He did immediately call for a review, but like all sports these days they require the umpire to give their initial decision in case of inconclusive evidence.Magpietothemax wrote: Good call, 90. Umpire should have immediately called for a review, then there would have been none of the controversy generated by his initial incorrect call.