#35,#16 Oliver Henry

Player President threads here thanks.

Moderator: bbmods

Locked
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22050
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

People are forgetting that GC are reportedly owed a 2nd round selection as part of the Bowes trade. If it isn't pick 25 Geelong currently don't hold another after trading their 2023 2nd yesterday. The thought has been GC were after a future 2nd.

If it is pick 25 then Geelong can only be delaying the trade because they didn't want Collingwood to come knocking for pick 7 as part of any deal for Henry (hasn't worked).

At this stage no media seem to be linking pick 25 with the trade for Bowes.

It was a baffling trade by Geelong in many ways because not only did it cost them a kings ransom in return, they included a future 2nd which could only ever further complicate the trade for Bowes (if GC are indeed after a future 2nd) and Henry because they know we're demanding their future 1st at a minimum. As it stands now the rules stipulate they can't trade their future first to us (this was likely their intention) and have no future 2nd to satisfy GC if that's what they want. If that is what they want they'll now need to source not 1 but 2 future 2nds in order to trade their future 1st to us (if another suitable trade can't be reached).

At this stage this trade only makes sense if they're determined to retain that future first and are putting in roadblocks to achieve that.

Of course we may well not be seeing all the pieces of the puzzle and my best guess would be that pick 25 could end up being part of a larger trade involving Grundy. Given we stated we wanted a pick inside 25 for Grundy I'm surprised no media haven't at least entertained the idea and are instead focusing on pick 25 in a straight swap for Henry.

I hope any missing piece of the puzzle isn't us just accepting pick 25 for Henry.

Screw Geelong.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
Piesnchess
Posts: 26202
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
Has liked: 229 times
Been liked: 94 times

Post by Piesnchess »

Pick 7 for Henry or they can get stuffed. Play Hardball.
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
Charlie Oneeye
Posts: 1038
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 11:17 pm
Has liked: 74 times
Been liked: 56 times

Post by Charlie Oneeye »

Ladies and Gentlemen,

No Heart... No want.

When push comes to shove..... SHOVE HARD.

We stand for this :


https://twitter.com/CollingwoodFC/statu ... 0419215362
watt price tully
Posts: 20842
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm

Post by watt price tully »

swoop42 wrote:People are forgetting that GC are reportedly owed a 2nd round selection as part of the Bowes trade. If it isn't pick 25 Geelong currently don't hold another after trading their 2023 2nd yesterday. The thought has been GC were after a future 2nd.

If it is pick 25 then Geelong can only be delaying the trade because they didn't want Collingwood to come knocking for pick 7 as part of any deal for Henry (hasn't worked).

At this stage no media seem to be linking pick 25 with the trade for Bowes.

It was a baffling trade by Geelong in many ways because not only did it cost them a kings ransom in return, they included a future 2nd which could only ever further complicate the trade for Bowes (if GC are indeed after a future 2nd) and Henry because they know we're demanding their future 1st at a minimum. As it stands now the rules stipulate they can't trade their future first to us (this was likely their intention) and have no future 2nd to satisfy GC if that's what they want. If that is what they want they'll now need to source not 1 but 2 future 2nds in order to trade their future 1st to us (if another suitable trade can't be reached).

At this stage this trade only makes sense if they're determined to retain that future first and are putting in roadblocks to achieve that.

Of course we may well not be seeing all the pieces of the puzzle and my best guess would be that pick 25 could end up being part of a larger trade involving Grundy. Given we stated we wanted a pick inside 25 for Grundy I'm surprised no media haven't at least entertained the idea and are instead focusing on pick 25 in a straight swap for Henry.

I hope any missing piece of the puzzle isn't us just accepting pick 25 for Henry.

Screw Geelong.
I see. How do they employ sheep’s bladders to prevent earthquakes?
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
Mr Miyagi
Posts: 7708
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2018 3:55 pm
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 184 times

Post by Mr Miyagi »

Charlie Oneeye wrote:Ladies and Gentlemen,

No Heart... No want.

When push comes to shove..... SHOVE HARD.

We stand for this :


https://twitter.com/CollingwoodFC/statu ... 0419215362
Hear hear
User avatar
piedys
Posts: 13425
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 9:49 pm
Location: Gold Coast Asylum
Has liked: 371 times
Been liked: 101 times

Post by piedys »

watt price tully wrote:I see. How do they employ sheep’s bladders to prevent earthquakes?
This new learning amazes me; perhaps Sir Bedevere can elaborate? :P
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22050
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

Fremantle in: Jackson
Fremantle out: Fremantle pick 13, Fremantle future 1st round selection, St Kilda future 3rd round selection (AFL assistance pick)

Melbourne in: Grundy, Geelong pick 7, Fremantle future 1st round selection, St Kilda future 3rd round selection (AFL assistance pick)
Melbourne out: Jackson, Fremantle pick 13, Melbourne pick 27, Melbourne future 2nd round selection

Geelong in: Henry, Fremantle pick 13, Melbourne pick 27, Collingwood pick 41, Melbourne future 2nd round selection
Geelong out: Geelong pick 7, Geelong pick 25, Geelong future 1st round selection

Collingwood in: Geelong pick 25, Geelong future 1st round selection
Collingwood out: Grundy, Henry, Collingwood pick 41

*Melbourne effectively pay 27 for Grundy and compensate Geelong for the 6 spot 1st round upgrade with a future 2nd round selection.
*Geelong pay a future 1st round selection for Henry, are compensated with pick 41 for the 2 spot downgrade of 27 to 25 and now have the option of using Melbourne's future second round selection as part of the Bowes deal.
*Collingwood receive the minimum required compensation for the loss of Grundy and Henry.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
piedys
Posts: 13425
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 9:49 pm
Location: Gold Coast Asylum
Has liked: 371 times
Been liked: 101 times

Post by piedys »

Careful there swoop42 ... might need you there wednesday to quarterback all this stuff; the idiots that are paid to do this type of analytical thinking, obviously can't!
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever
User avatar
Haff
Posts: 5027
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2016 1:24 pm
Has liked: 15 times
Been liked: 55 times

Post by Haff »

swoop42 wrote:Fremantle in: Jackson
Fremantle out: Fremantle pick 13, Fremantle future 1st round selection, St Kilda future 3rd round selection (AFL assistance pick)

Melbourne in: Grundy, Geelong pick 7, Fremantle future 1st round selection, St Kilda future 3rd round selection (AFL assistance pick)
Melbourne out: Jackson, Fremantle pick 13, Melbourne pick 27, Melbourne future 2nd round selection

Geelong in: Henry, Fremantle pick 13, Melbourne pick 27, Collingwood pick 41, Melbourne future 2nd round selection
Geelong out: Geelong pick 7, Geelong pick 25, Geelong future 1st round selection

Collingwood in: Geelong pick 25, Geelong future 1st round selection
Collingwood out: Grundy, Henry, Collingwood pick 41

*Melbourne effectively pay 27 for Grundy and compensate Geelong for the 6 spot 1st round upgrade with a future 2nd round selection.
*Geelong pay a future 1st round selection for Henry, are compensated with pick 41 for the 2 spot downgrade of 27 to 25 and now have the option of using Melbourne's future second round selection as part of the Bowes deal.
*Collingwood receive the minimum required compensation for the loss of Grundy and Henry.
Minimum is an understatement.
I guess if you add a third column around the salary cap differential then we’re getting more out of this but it still stings to be losing Grundy and Henry for a pick ~18 and 25.
The match day thread is for unfiltered BS knee jerk reactions. The time for level headed comment comes after.
User avatar
RudeBoy
Posts: 22171
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:08 pm
Been liked: 148 times

Post by RudeBoy »

The bottom line is we screwed ourselves when we agreed to Grundy's exorbitant contract. We are now 'forced' to sell him for unders. It's our fault not his.

As for the Henry situation. Shit happens I'm afraid. Reckon we'll end up accepting a shitty deal from the Cats, rather than get nothing for him.
Last edited by RudeBoy on Sun Oct 09, 2022 9:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
Pies2016
Posts: 6871
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:03 am
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 176 times

Post by Pies2016 »

Interesting announcement overnight by the AFL declaring there will be no relaxing of the rules surrounding the trading of future picks ( ie if you trade out your first, you can’t trade out your second, third or fourth. Conversely, if you trade out any or all of your second, third or fourth, you can’t trade out your first )
This has significant implications for clubs like GEELONG, Richmond, Brisbane and Port who are all involved in multiple trades but no longer have the currency they hoped they would be afforded with a rule exemption. In short, the Cats ability to put forward a more favourable trade than pick 25 has just been made a bit more difficult ( although a possible Ratagalea trade to Port could improve the picks on hand for any Henry trade )
User avatar
Culprit
Posts: 17243
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Port Melbourne
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 68 times

Post by Culprit »

Pies2016 wrote:Interesting announcement overnight by the AFL declaring there will be no relaxing of the rules surrounding the trading of future picks ( ie if you trade out your first, you can’t trade out your second, third or fourth. Conversely, if you trade out any or all of your second, third or fourth, you can’t trade out your first )
This has significant implications for clubs like GEELONG, Richmond, Brisbane and Port who are all involved in multiple trades but no longer have the currency they hoped they would be afforded with a rule exemption. In short, the Cats ability to put forward a more favourable trade than pick 25 has just been made a bit more difficult ( although a possible Ratagalea trade to Port could improve the picks on hand for any Henry trade )
That's been quite a revelation in that ruling and I will add, good on the AFL. Trading future picks has been getting out of control.
Pies2016
Posts: 6871
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:03 am
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 176 times

Post by Pies2016 »

^^^’
Totally agree. I thought they would cave in.
And if I’m the Lions this morning, I’m calling a meeting and asking the footy dept, so which one of our targets are we now walking away from.
Gary Player “ the harder I practice, the luckier I get “
slangman
Posts: 2727
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 1:48 pm
Has liked: 39 times
Been liked: 23 times

Post by slangman »

RudeBoy wrote:The bottom line is we screwed ourselves when we agreed to Grundy's exorbitant contract. We are now 'forced' to sell him for unders. It's our fault not his.

As for the Henry situation. Shit happens I'm afraid. Reckon we'll end up accepting a shitty deal from the Cats, rather than get nothing for him.
Considering Geelong have the last pick in the PSD I can’t see us accepting a shitty deal for a kid who has immense talent. That would put Henry in a position where he would either re-sign with us or put himself in the PSD where he knows that the likelihood of him getting to the Cats would be close to zero.
How many 19yo medium forwards in their second season can snap a goal from 40m on the boundary or kick four goals in two quarters in a match winning performance? Players with the talent of Henry are few and far between and I can’t see us giving him away for peanuts to the reigning premier.
The fact that he wants to play with his brother is and should be if no relevance to Collingwood.
- Side By Side -
User avatar
Presti35
Posts: 19938
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 6:01 pm
Location: London, England
Has liked: 447 times
Been liked: 223 times

Post by Presti35 »

If the trade falls on its arse, Henry will resign with Collingwood. 2 years. I guess we can come back next year and try again.

I dont think he'll go into the PSD. It's either traded to Geelong or re-signing with Collingwood for a couple seasons.

I'm hoping to see other deals completed first, before we even entertain this one.

I guess the big one is, can Oli Henry fall in love with Collingwood?
A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned!
Locked