This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.
Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Suggestions, praise, feedback. Need to communicate with the moderators? This is the place. If you need to communicate privately with the moderators, send email to lesbastardssinistres(at)magpies.net
<split from "Parliament House sexual assault and harassment allegations" thread>
David wrote:<Just a general note to avoid any potentially defamatory accusations or suggestions while discussing this topic. Thanks, David for BBMods.>
Fair enough, but why did the thread disappear?
Couldn't you just delete inappropriate posts and do the warning?
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
stui magpie wrote:Fair enough, but why did the thread disappear?
Couldn't you just delete inappropriate posts and do the warning?
In theory, yes, but it’s not the mods’ job to bump old threads if a post deletion, thread split or whatever sends it back off the front page. Personally I’d find it weirder to see a six-month old thread bumped with nothing but a moderator note, but that’s just me. Ultimately, this is what the search function is for.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
You could have just explained that then. One minute the thread was at top of the page, next it wasn't on the page. I don't know the mechanics of the software so it never occurred to me that if you deleted the post that bumped the thread it would fall back to where it had been previously.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
