Pies4shaw wrote: The joint BBC/ITV/Sky News IPSOS exit poll predicts (326 is a majority):
Labour: 410 410
Conservative: 131 119
Liberal Democrats: 61 71
Reform UK: 13 4
Scottish National Party: 10 8
Plaid Cymru: 4 4
Green: 2 4
Others: 19 25
International elections
Moderator: bbmods
Final results are declared in all but 8 seats and, for reference, I've put the declared numbers in bold against the exit poll estimates:
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54832
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 126 times
- Been liked: 163 times
-
- Posts: 16634
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 10:41 pm
- Has liked: 14 times
- Been liked: 28 times
The Tories were the most appalling government I've witnessed in my lifetime bar none. The embody everything I harp on about in terms of craven, self-serving recklessness. Very literally, just their removal lifts a dead weight off the UK. A bit like the ALP, all Labour has to do is be modest and moderate and the country will be better off.
The damage done runs deep, though, so it was important the Tories were wiped out so that they can re-form and reform, separating themselves from the ERG/Grease Mogg/Farage extremists. You know things are bad when I bother sparing a thought for the Tories as an organisation.
To my mind, one electoral cycle is needed now to steady the ship, which itself is a gain given every minute of Tory rule damaged the UK. Many ministries have had a dozen ring-ins in as many years, so the policy and delivery well is completely dry. Then, should a more moderate Tory-Labour cycle arise deeper structural shifts in the right direction will be more likely.
The test of Labour will include (a) reining in the shockingly corrupt contracts handed out to the private sector and restoring standards and expectations, (b) rebuilding some modicum of administrative competence, continuity and reliability across the country, (c) setting a clearer national advantage and industrial policy direction, (d) giving hope and opportunity to dire, dead areas and regions (the midlands has the most coherent, sensible policy, so something along those lines but nationally), and of course reintegrating productively and cost-effectively with the EU.
A 10% improvement across those areas will start steadying the ship, while a 30% improvement will start to see noticeable gains and recovery. That's a huge task already, and a lot will depend on how sensibly the Tories reform on the back of the slime bags and grifters who have been removed. If they remain extremist spoilers, the decline will only continue. Once stability has taken root, deeper shifts can then be looked at, but the basics have to be brought back on track first.
The damage done runs deep, though, so it was important the Tories were wiped out so that they can re-form and reform, separating themselves from the ERG/Grease Mogg/Farage extremists. You know things are bad when I bother sparing a thought for the Tories as an organisation.
To my mind, one electoral cycle is needed now to steady the ship, which itself is a gain given every minute of Tory rule damaged the UK. Many ministries have had a dozen ring-ins in as many years, so the policy and delivery well is completely dry. Then, should a more moderate Tory-Labour cycle arise deeper structural shifts in the right direction will be more likely.
The test of Labour will include (a) reining in the shockingly corrupt contracts handed out to the private sector and restoring standards and expectations, (b) rebuilding some modicum of administrative competence, continuity and reliability across the country, (c) setting a clearer national advantage and industrial policy direction, (d) giving hope and opportunity to dire, dead areas and regions (the midlands has the most coherent, sensible policy, so something along those lines but nationally), and of course reintegrating productively and cost-effectively with the EU.
A 10% improvement across those areas will start steadying the ship, while a 30% improvement will start to see noticeable gains and recovery. That's a huge task already, and a lot will depend on how sensibly the Tories reform on the back of the slime bags and grifters who have been removed. If they remain extremist spoilers, the decline will only continue. Once stability has taken root, deeper shifts can then be looked at, but the basics have to be brought back on track first.
In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm
-
- Posts: 16634
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 10:41 pm
- Has liked: 14 times
- Been liked: 28 times
People forever seem to underrate stability, policy coherence, small gains and the compounding of small gains. Perhaps much like Albanese, Starmer certainly won't get the heart racing, but simply stopping hitting oneself in the hammer is still a real gain, shortcomings notwithstanding.
It's the quality of what follows, including the sanity of the Tory party, that will matter most. Unfortunately, fantastical visions of wondrous reforms and new heavens and earths are just that. But you can still build on small, real steps. Just appointing ministers to porfolios for longer than five minutes will be a gain.
It might be a very low bar, but people always underestimate just how bad 'bad' can get and did get under the Tories.
The article title is stronger than the content of the article, which is sensible enough to get the gist of how even modest hope is better than no hope:
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/05/opin ... tives.html
It's the quality of what follows, including the sanity of the Tory party, that will matter most. Unfortunately, fantastical visions of wondrous reforms and new heavens and earths are just that. But you can still build on small, real steps. Just appointing ministers to porfolios for longer than five minutes will be a gain.
It might be a very low bar, but people always underestimate just how bad 'bad' can get and did get under the Tories.
The article title is stronger than the content of the article, which is sensible enough to get the gist of how even modest hope is better than no hope:
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/05/opin ... tives.html
In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm
- Jezza
- Posts: 29525
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
- Location: Ponsford End
- Has liked: 259 times
- Been liked: 338 times
Final results.
SEATS WON:
[*] Labour = 411 (+209)
[*] Conservative = 121 (-244)
[*] Liberal Democrats = 72 (+61)
[*] Scottish National = 9 (-39)
[*] Sinn Fein = 7 (0)
[*] Reform = 5 (+5)
[*] Green = 4 (+3)
[*] Plaid Cymru = 4 (0)
[*] Other = 17 (+5)
Labour have formed majority government.
PRIMARY VOTE:
[*] Labour = 33.7% (+1.6)
[*] Conservative = 23.7% (-20.0)
[*] Reform = 14.3% (+12.3)
[*] Lib Dems = 12.2% (+0.7)
[*] Green = 6.1% (+3.5)
[*] Scottish National = 2.5% (-1.3)
[*] Sinn Fein = 0.7% (+0.1)
[*] Plaid Cymru = 0.7% (+0.2)
[*] Other = 6.1%
Turnout was 59.9%, which was down 7.4% from the last election in 2019 and the lowest since 2001.
SEATS WON:
[*] Labour = 411 (+209)
[*] Conservative = 121 (-244)
[*] Liberal Democrats = 72 (+61)
[*] Scottish National = 9 (-39)
[*] Sinn Fein = 7 (0)
[*] Reform = 5 (+5)
[*] Green = 4 (+3)
[*] Plaid Cymru = 4 (0)
[*] Other = 17 (+5)
Labour have formed majority government.
PRIMARY VOTE:
[*] Labour = 33.7% (+1.6)
[*] Conservative = 23.7% (-20.0)
[*] Reform = 14.3% (+12.3)
[*] Lib Dems = 12.2% (+0.7)
[*] Green = 6.1% (+3.5)
[*] Scottish National = 2.5% (-1.3)
[*] Sinn Fein = 0.7% (+0.1)
[*] Plaid Cymru = 0.7% (+0.2)
[*] Other = 6.1%
Turnout was 59.9%, which was down 7.4% from the last election in 2019 and the lowest since 2001.
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54832
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 126 times
- Been liked: 163 times
^
Those are extraordinary numbers. Labour only got a swing of 1.6%, but scooped the pool of seats on what I assume were preferences.
So people didn't vote Labour, they voted ABC, Anyone But Conservatives.
Those are extraordinary numbers. Labour only got a swing of 1.6%, but scooped the pool of seats on what I assume were preferences.
So people didn't vote Labour, they voted ABC, Anyone But Conservatives.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
^ No - first past the post in the UK, so "Reform" took the conservative "protest" vote and handed the reins to Labour.
That's an interesting phenomenon, of course - it shows that - as of last Thursday, anyway - about 14% of voters preferred the neo-fascists to a very unradical Labour platform. You would think that a barely competent government that did a bit towards fixing some of the most broken things in the UK (the NHS, the lack of reasonably-paid work for ordinary people, the general extent of poverty, the embarrassingly third-world infrastructure etc) could probably attract a fair bit of that vote over a couple of years.
That's an interesting phenomenon, of course - it shows that - as of last Thursday, anyway - about 14% of voters preferred the neo-fascists to a very unradical Labour platform. You would think that a barely competent government that did a bit towards fixing some of the most broken things in the UK (the NHS, the lack of reasonably-paid work for ordinary people, the general extent of poverty, the embarrassingly third-world infrastructure etc) could probably attract a fair bit of that vote over a couple of years.
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54832
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 126 times
- Been liked: 163 times
- Magpietothemax
- Posts: 8024
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 11:05 pm
- Has liked: 26 times
- Been liked: 31 times
- Magpietothemax
- Posts: 8024
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 11:05 pm
- Has liked: 26 times
- Been liked: 31 times
- stui magpie
- Posts: 54832
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 am
- Location: In flagrante delicto
- Has liked: 126 times
- Been liked: 163 times
Yes, but under our preferential voting system, Labor got the preferences from the Greens and Teals. Under the UK system we'd have a Lib/Nat governmentMagpietothemax wrote:Similar to what happened here in Australia at the last Federal election. Labor won with a similar percentage of the vote.stui magpie wrote:^
Wow, so Labour wins a massive majority with only 33% of the vote.
.
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Yup...winners bonus is a lot larger in fpp systems though. In UK Labour won 63 per cent of seats with 33per cent of the vote. Here it was 51per cent for similar primary vote.Magpietothemax wrote:Similar to what happened here in Australia at the last Federal election. Labor won with a similar percentage of the vote.stui magpie wrote:^
Wow, so Labour wins a massive majority with only 33% of the vote.
.
- Magpietothemax
- Posts: 8024
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 11:05 pm
- Has liked: 26 times
- Been liked: 31 times