Pre-Match. Pies v. Tigers. All comments

Match previews, reviews, reports and discussion.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
Magpietothemax
Posts: 8024
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 11:05 pm
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 31 times

Re: Pre-Match. Pies v. Tigers. All comments

Post by Magpietothemax »

^Amazingly prescient, WL. Virtually all your recommendations have been implemented (we will wait tomorrow to see if Sidey is the sub). Now we know who to blame if we lose tomorrow. :wink:
(Reply to WL 26 July, 11:57 am)
Free Julian Assange!!
Ice in the veins
User avatar
Piesnchess
Posts: 26202
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
Has liked: 229 times
Been liked: 94 times

Re: Pre-Match. Pies v. Tigers. All comments

Post by Piesnchess »

JDG Rested, good idea , get him refreshed for Pendles 400th, logical choice.
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
User avatar
Jezza
Posts: 29525
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:28 pm
Location: Ponsford End
Has liked: 259 times
Been liked: 338 times

Re: Pre-Match. Pies v. Tigers. All comments

Post by Jezza »

Just need to win and get some confidence back, no matter how ugly it might be.

We've looked devoid of confidence in the past few weeks.
🏆 | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | 🏆
User avatar
Piesnchess
Posts: 26202
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:24 pm
Has liked: 229 times
Been liked: 94 times

Re: Pre-Match. Pies v. Tigers. All comments

Post by Piesnchess »

^ True its confidence, its mindset, any win will do, but hopefully, a decent 30+ point one, even if it is a scrap, just get the victory. We cannot go 0-5, no way Jose, this is a must win.
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
User avatar
Culprit
Posts: 17238
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: Port Melbourne
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 68 times

Re: Pre-Match. Pies v. Tigers. All comments

Post by Culprit »

The Bombers losing leaves the door open but we have to win every game and hope others drop games.
woodys_world69
Posts: 2230
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 10:00 am
Location: Brisbane
Been liked: 34 times

Re: Pre-Match. Pies v. Tigers. All comments

Post by woodys_world69 »

the irony from here, if we do win every game we are a good chance to go back 2 back
User avatar
RudeBoy
Posts: 22169
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:08 pm
Been liked: 146 times

Re: Pre-Match. Pies v. Tigers. All comments

Post by RudeBoy »

By my reckoning, we could make the 8 even if we lost another game (probably to the Swans), but certainly we'll need to win 4 out of the remaining 5. That must start today, with a demolition of the Tigers, to get our confidence back. We have the players to beat any team, but we've somehow lost our mojo. We can quickly get that back with a good win today. Fwiw, I reckon 'Smokin'' Joe Richards will play a blinder today and kick 3 goals.

Pies by 36 pts.
User avatar
think better
Posts: 3113
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 4:42 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 40 times

Re: Pre-Match. Pies v. Tigers. All comments

Post by think better »

For me Cox back in is the biggest change. He allows a lot more flexibility in the forward line and will bring the smalls into the game. Watch out for Schultz, Hill and Richards to get a few. This also allows Elliot to roam out a bit and for Mc Stay to be the big lead up.

The other advantage is around the ground with Cameron able to take a break more often and even rest up forward.

The kick outs have been a worry for a few weeks and maybe with Mc Stay, Cameron and Cox able to roam a bit there will be more targets. This is one area where Mihoceck was so valuable.
I think therefore I think - I think
User avatar
SLORT
Posts: 565
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2014 5:01 am
Has liked: 293 times
Been liked: 158 times

Re: Pre-Match. Pies v. Tigers. All comments

Post by SLORT »

Richards out (illness). Sullivan in.
Post Reply