Losing Shaw, McGough will bite us on the a***

All trade and draft talk here thanks..... this means you DTM!!!!

Moderator: bbmods

User avatar
Johnson#26
Posts: 24763
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2003 6:54 am

Post by Johnson#26 »

Does Shaw fit into our best 22? I don't know. I think McGough does, purely because of his ball winning abillity. With him, you are guarrenteed 20+ touches a game. If his kicking was better he'd be a star. He is a poor mans Simon Black.

I would like Shaw to stay, but it may just be better for him and the club if he moved on. Especiallaly if Heath/Brayden over took him next season - that would kill his confidence.
User avatar
BBHS
Posts: 4975
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 3:13 pm
Location: Bellarine
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 12 times

Post by BBHS »

can rhyce shaw shoot free throws. can shaq run fast and kick at the same time, only time will tell.

just tell me to shut up anytime now.
User avatar
David
Posts: 50682
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: the edge of the deep green sea
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 83 times

Post by David »

I wouldn't like to see McGough go, but Shaw may have to.
"Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence." – Julian Assange
User avatar
Cam
Posts: 15355
Joined: Fri May 10, 2002 6:01 pm
Location: Springvale
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 28 times

Post by Cam »

Johnson#26 wrote: I think McGough does, purely because of his ball winning abillity. With him, you are guarrenteed 20+ touches a game. If his kicking was better he'd be a star. He is a poor mans Simon Black.
Johnno maaate what are you smoking? McGough is a naked, blind, mute, alcoholic, lice-infested man's Simon Black.

20+ touches, but only 7 good ones. Not quite a porn film, more an SBS movie.
Get back on top.
Cannibal
Posts: 2434
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 12:44 pm
Location: Buninyong

Post by Cannibal »

I totally agree we need to keep MCG for his ball-winning skills (which are pretty scarce) and think that if the club can just make an effort to get his kicking right, he will be a star.

I accept that there is a strong difference of opinion on Shaw. Offering considered opinions about the list is what this part of the board is all about, so I'm happy to agree to disagree!

However, I will offer this observation: Shaw will play senior footy for one club only - Collingwood. I think if it is put to him by MM that it is time he moved elsewhere, it would break the kid's heart. I doubt if he would want to play anywhere else and if he does go and attempt to make something out of it at another club, it will end in disaster for him and the club which takes him.
Glory Glory Good Old Collingwood, Glory Glory Hallelujah,
Collingwood's The Greatest Team The World Has Ever Seen,
And The 'Pies Go Marching On (in Black and White Stripes Forever!).
User avatar
sq3
Posts: 3668
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2004 1:23 pm
Location: Gold Coast/Tampa

Post by sq3 »

Whoa guys - Droche hit the nail on the head earlier - Get a good skills coach who can do remedial work with Shaw, MCG, OB, Lica and Cole.

Has anyone ever seen and Essendon or Carlton team with poor disposal skills by foot - cause I haven't. That then means that they have better skills coaches than we do.

Do the Pies have a FULL TIME skills coach - no - does the AIS - yes - and who is the kicking mechanics example at the AIS - Didak.

Pies biggest problems are the off field staff not the playing list.

If we fix the off field staff we could stick with exactly the same list and finish top 4 in 2005.
Gomez
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 12:36 am

Post by Gomez »

sq3,
By the time they get to AFL, it is too late to change kicking techniques.
The speed & pressure dosen't give them time to think about kicking mechanics.

How many days/weeks/months/years would Richmond have put in to fix Richardson's kicking?

You can't teach courage either & Shaw embarrasses us the way he avoids contact when there's a loose ball to contest.
User avatar
Johnson#26
Posts: 24763
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2003 6:54 am

Post by Johnson#26 »

Cam wrote:
Johnson#26 wrote: I think McGough does, purely because of his ball winning abillity. With him, you are guarrenteed 20+ touches a game. If his kicking was better he'd be a star. He is a poor mans Simon Black.
Johnno maaate what are you smoking? McGough is a naked, blind, mute, alcoholic, lice-infested man's Simon Black.

20+ touches, but only 7 good ones. Not quite a porn film, more an SBS movie.
He wins a lot of the ball, and as it was mentioned earlier, get a new and good skills coach. Teach these guys how to kick. When Goughy does, he will be a poor mans Black, in that he woins a lot of the ball and *hopefully* uses it well. He has the abillity to be a gun.
User avatar
Cam
Posts: 15355
Joined: Fri May 10, 2002 6:01 pm
Location: Springvale
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 28 times

Post by Cam »

Yes, agreed, when he can kick.
Get back on top.
chalky
Posts: 409
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 8:01 pm
Location: victoria

Post by chalky »

McG would play in the midfield, in the thick of the action, where clean hands and disposals are at a premium. Got no probs with his hands, but his kicking to position under pressure (even w/o pressure!) is a serious concern. It's not that I've got anything against the lad, he certainly knows how to get the pill, it's that he will be competing for limited midfield time against guys like Leon, Johnno, Dids perhaps even Cole. He is more vulnerable because of his weaknesses. At this level they should be gimmes. Look, MM may see the potential in the boy and keep the faith with him. There is no doubt our midfield will be seriouly scrutinised and some aggressive moves made to increase the "grunt" ie clean hands and clear the pack and precise disposal ala Bux, Burns etc.
Post Reply