McGough and Shaw to be traded?

Sultan of spin · Post by **Sultan of spin** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 9:30 pm

According to chanel 10 news tonight McGough has requested a trade to further his career (ala Scotland) and under the right circumstances Shaw could also be trded.

The report also claimed Kinnear and McKee have retired, which I have also heard from another source as well.

spoljar · Post by **spoljar** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 9:39 pm

Just heard in Fox Footy News that McGough has requested the trade. Also said that Shaw and Mckee would be offered as possible trades. Did not mention anything about Kinnear.

maggies34 · Post by **maggies34** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 9:40 pm

Sultan of spin wrote:According to chanel 10 news tonight McGough has requested a trade to further his career (ala Scotland) and under the right circumstances Shaw could also be trded.

The report also claimed Kinnear and McKee have retired, which I have also heard from another source as well.

The problem is there onfield performances over the last year and shaws last two grand finals have been ordinary to say the least, i dont think they will attract much more that draft picks!!

sq3 · Post by **sq3** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 11:48 pm

Pies need to be very careful here with MCG.

Pagan will want him badly to replace Ratten and they can then have an in and under player with good hands and outriders of Scoots and Stevens who both have very good disposal on both sides of the body.

This could really bite us big time.

bokka · Post by **bokka** » Tue Sep 14, 2004 3:50 am

I agree sq3 - keep mcG on and give him more game time. FAct he is dissatisfied suggests he is pretty well over the OP, which would make him an even bigger loss.

mattdally · Post by **mattdally** » Tue Sep 14, 2004 1:29 pm

trade them both.
also get rid of obree, lokan and lonie.

time for a change. clean out a bit i reckon...

shaw and mcg have had enough chances.
shaw = risky
mcg = slow

neither can kick

obree is a worry and lokan's been a dud since he arrived

mattdally · Post by **mattdally** » Tue Sep 14, 2004 1:30 pm

sorry, take lonie off that list. he is a required player

Johnson#26 · Post by **Johnson#26** » Tue Sep 14, 2004 5:23 pm

I don't think MCG has had enough chances. It think the opposite. He could be a gun. We shouldn't trade them. McGough is in our best side.

How Lonie could go amazes me.

This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.

McGough and Shaw to be traded?

McGough and Shaw to be traded?

Re: McGough and Shaw to be traded?