World Cup Squad

Post by **Donny** » Mon Dec 09, 2002 7:38 pm

Well the Poms would have trouble beating an egg at the moment !!

Justin Langer and Mike Hussey didn't harm their World Cup chances any in the Australia A win over the hapless Englishmen. I can tell you, the selectors have a high opinion of Hussey as a middle order batsman. His run-a-ball innings was of high quality and considering Oz A were 5/124, his batting (with Campbell and Bracken) ensured a competitive total.

Other WC squad members, Brad Hogg and Andrew Symonds, turned in good bowling spells

Donny.
GO THE MIGHTY WOODSMEN !! ALL THE WAY IN 2003 AND BEYOND !!!!

[This message has been edited by MAGFAN8 (edited 09 December 2002).]

JLC · Post by **JLC** » Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:02 am

If Andrew Symonds bowls during the World Cup i think the better batsman will clobber him. Im not sure that he is a good enough bowler as well as the fact that the South African pitches will not suit him.

Langers innings was ok and he made the most of being dropped on zero? I hope Langer makes the World Cup Squad

Michael Clarke looks like a natural and i hope the selectors give him an opportunity very soon. Maybe he needs to work on hitting the singles etc. His fielding was very good from what i saw for someone so young.

If Lehmann doesnt perform in next two tests he will be watching the West Indies tour on Tv and Clarke will take his place.

jlc

Essendon 2000 premiers
2001 runners up
2002 fifth
2003 ????
The slide continues

couragous cloke · Post by **couragous cloke** » Wed Dec 11, 2002 5:35 pm

i went to this day thingy at dandenong and cameron white was there! this was before he made his debut for 1dayers! i was bowling against him and seriously! he shouldnt be in the squad! i dont see how he can beat steve waugh to the 30 man squad! i think that is a shocking decision !

footy ROX!

gobbles21 · Post by **gobbles21** » Thu Dec 12, 2002 12:56 pm

Cameron White is mainly a bowler that can bat a bit down the order.
He was selected as a spin bowler.

"I'm such a good lover because I practice a lot on my own." - Woody Allen

gobbles21 · Post by **gobbles21** » Mon Dec 16, 2002 4:33 pm

Who do you think will replace Shane Warne if he can't make it?

"I'm such a good lover because I practice a lot on my own." - Woody Allen

Ian · Post by **Ian** » Mon Dec 16, 2002 6:24 pm

McGill now looks a definite possibility.

JLC · Post by **JLC** » Tue Dec 17, 2002 3:11 am

McGill is a good test match bowler but in the World Cup he will get slogged.

jlc

Essendon 2000 premiers
2001 runners up
2002 fifth
2003 ????
The slide continues

JLC · Post by **JLC** » Tue Dec 17, 2002 3:17 am

If Warne cant play in World Cup Australia now has to find 20 overs from somewhere. Warnes 10 and the 10 from the fifth bowler eg Watson etc.

I dont think Australia has any other spinner who would be reliable enough to bowl 10 overs in the World Cup without getting a pasting from India or Pakistans batsmen.

If McGrath or Gilesppie fail to make inroads on a teams batting line up they wont have the flexibility of using Warne to get that vital early break through

jlc

Essendon 2000 premiers
2001 runners up
2002 fifth
2003 ????
The slide continues

Bartros · Post by **Bartros** » Tue Dec 17, 2002 6:19 am

I am thinking if Warne cant make the World Cup the young C.White from Victoria mite get the call up!!! Because he cant bat abit also!!!

Long Live the mite and power of
Shane Morwood (member of 1990 team,1988 Vic rep)

Kristin5 · Post by **Kristin5** » Tue Dec 17, 2002 6:29 am

My immediate thought was that they'll now bring in MacGill (much to my disgust - can't stand him!)

Hey, I was impressed with Brett Lee yesterday - very economical bowling, for him!

"I'm sure people see me as a screaming redhead with a big pair of boobs, but I like to think I've got things to say." Geri Halliwell, former member of the Spice Girls

JLC · Post by **JLC** » Tue Dec 17, 2002 9:25 am

Cameron White is too much of a risk. I cant remember the draw but if you played a team like India or Pakistan they will tear White to shreds i think.

I think they will have to pray that Warne gets better. But whatever happens he is unlikely to be at 100% fitness. However a 75% fit Warne is better than anyother spinner going around.

The difference with the Woeld Cup is that the stakes are much high when it gets to the cut throat stages. You cant go oh well i will do better next match as there may not be a next match. Thats why Warne and Waugh are so good as they deliver when the stakes are at their highest.

jlc

Essendon 2000 premiers
2001 runners up
2002 fifth
2003 ????
The slide continues

CQ · Post by CQ » Tue Dec 17, 2002 10:35 am

yes its a bummer about warne but if hes not right to play then theyre gonna have to put someone like macgill in, he does alright anyway.

TARKO TARKO MAN!
I WANT TO BE A TARKO MAN!

gobbles21 · Post by **gobbles21** » Tue Dec 17, 2002 12:21 pm

I agree that it is a risk whoever they take (if Warne can't make it). But you have to have a spinner in the team. Whether the selectors are happy with Lehmann and Bevan as part time options plus possibly Symonds is another matter, but I think you have to take MacGill because he has been reliable in the past.
Another point if Warne misses out is the experience it takes away from the team. An inexperienced team may collapse under presure, which re kick starts the debate about Steve Waugh and the much nedded experience he will add to the team.

"I'm such a good lover because I practice a lot on my own." - Woody Allen

JLC · Post by **JLC** » Tue Dec 17, 2002 3:02 pm

If MacGill plays they lose a lot of flexability. Firstly MacGill cant bat very well so the tail becomes slightly longer.

Secondly MaGill isnt good enough to bowl in the first 15 overs or the last 10 overs of an innings. Therefore you are forced to bowl him in the middle stages of the match.

Thirdly how good is MacGill in the field. At least Warne could field in the slips and has a good pair of hands.

MacGill also has a tendancy to crack the sooks and i dont think he would add much to the team harmony.

Id rather go for a spinner who can also bat so that the damage caused is minimal. At least that player can contribute by scoring runs.

jlc

Essendon 2000 premiers
2001 runners up
2002 fifth
2003 ????
The slide continues

Post by **Donny** » Tue Dec 17, 2002 8:12 pm

Aren't you all forgetting Hauritz ? They're not grooming him for nothing and MacGilla wasn't even in the selectors preferred 30.

MacGill is an outside chance but only if he: 1/ gets selected for the Melbourne Test (we could well go in with 4 quicks) and 2/ bowls really economically and takes a heap of wickets.

Donny.

GO THE MIGHTY WOODSMEN !! ALL THE WAY IN 2003 AND BEYOND !!!!

This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.

World Cup Squad