Post Match. Pies beat Dogs . All comments please.
Moderator: bbmods
- think positive
- Posts: 40243
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 342 times
- Been liked: 105 times
Nothing to do with goals, I just don’t remember seeing much of him all gameRudeBoy wrote:It was a tongue in cheek comment. JT was being criticised for not kicking enough goals, so I thought i'd ask how many goals Daics had been kicking.jatsad wrote:Not all about goals. He is getting the ball and is a beautiful kick with both feet.RudeBoy wrote:How many goals is Daics averaging in the ressies?
He has been playing well and deserves a chance.
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
- tbaker
- Posts: 1211
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2018 11:51 am
- Location: Q19 Southern Stand MCG
Who knows...but the coaches votes said a lot when Grundy was unanimously assessed as best on ground from all media outlets covering the game. Buckley wasn't happy about something from Grundy in that 1st halfPies4shaw wrote:^ What, beyond having the single biggest game by a ruckman in 141 years, could the Coach have wanted from Grundy?
I find your lack of faith disturbing
- Abdul The Bull
- Posts: 457
- Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2017 4:03 pm
I haven't checked the stats but I would suggest that the hit-outs to advantage was low. Many times I observed Grundy's tap work going the wrong way. Now, that's as much our mids' fault as it is Grundy's. However, as the General in the mid-field - particularly if you wish to command north of $1M per year for your trade - you would expect he would take control of that issue. Couple that with the fact that he was up against a virtual rookie opponent he should have made more of his advantage.tbaker wrote:Who knows...but the coaches votes said a lot when Grundy was unanimously assessed as best on ground from all media outlets covering the game. Buckley wasn't happy about something from Grundy in that 1st halfPies4shaw wrote:^ What, beyond having the single biggest game by a ruckman in 141 years, could the Coach have wanted from Grundy?
I still personally think he was BOG but I can understand why Buckley was the way he was.
There are 10 types of people in this world, those that understand binary and those that don't.
It was 11 to 1 at halftime, then he got going. Since he was already BOG then - by an extraordinary margin - it is remarkable that one or other coach (we don’t actually know which) apparently thought there were 3 better players than him on the ground. I’m sure they just make it up sometimes.Abdul The Bull wrote:I haven't checked the stats but I would suggest that the hit-outs to advantage was low. Many times I observed Grundy's tap work going the wrong way. Now, that's as much our mids' fault as it is Grundy's. However, as the General in the mid-field - particularly if you wish to command north of $1M per year for your trade - you would expect he would take control of that issue. Couple that with the fact that he was up against a virtual rookie opponent he should have made more of his advantage.tbaker wrote:Who knows...but the coaches votes said a lot when Grundy was unanimously assessed as best on ground from all media outlets covering the game. Buckley wasn't happy about something from Grundy in that 1st halfPies4shaw wrote:^ What, beyond having the single biggest game by a ruckman in 141 years, could the Coach have wanted from Grundy?
I still personally think he was BOG but I can understand why Buckley was the way he was.
-
- Posts: 20842
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 1:14 pm
We were lucky to win that match. The way the ball bounced out of our forward 50 plus the number of shots missed by the dogs means that any decent team would have had our measure for sure.
We were very lucky.
We were very lucky.
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
- think positive
- Posts: 40243
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:33 pm
- Location: somewhere
- Has liked: 342 times
- Been liked: 105 times
welll its about damn time we got a little luck!watt price tully wrote:We were lucky to win that match. The way the ball bounced out of our forward 50 plus the number of shots missed by the dogs means that any decent team would have had our measure for sure.
We were very lucky.
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
I struggle to remember a single moderately hard set shot from either side that was converted. Can anyone remember? Maybe Lloyd's goal in Q4 was moderately difficult. Maybe one or more of Schache's.watt price tully wrote:... plus the number of shots missed by the dogs ...
JdG had two set shots in the third quarter, one from the left and one from the right. One was fairly easy. Both were out on the full.
Most of the goals from both sides were kicked from inside or near the goal square.