Page 75 of 123

Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2015 6:56 pm
by Dave The Man
Have to learn to do it to the Body and not the Head. Just like Sam Mitchell Does

Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2015 7:33 pm
by MatthewBoydFanClub
Yeah. Terrible injury to Westhoff. A cut lip. And he had the audacity after the game to say it was nothing. Didn't he realise the injury was inflicted by a Collingwood player. That's 4 weeks minimum. So Schulz gets nothing for a sling tackle on Richards who's unable to protect his head from impacting the ground. Gray is similarly concussed in a sling tackle by Gibbs, so that's 2 weeks for Gibbs because he plays for a Victorian side. Mitchell gets off though because he plays for Hawthorn and Fyfe was always going to,get off because he's the Brownlow favourite.

Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2015 7:41 pm
by inxs88
I like the fact that Taylor Adams plays on the edge and has some grunt with a capital C in him!

Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2015 7:49 pm
by qldmagpie67
Ok so Adams gets 2 weeks maybe fair but I thought 1 would have done going on what's been given nothing this year thus far.
Now they say Schultz should have been given 2 weeks on his sling tackle the week before which the AFL could have done last Tuesday and suspended him then but no his free to play against us.
Mitchell gets sighted for a3rd time in 2yrs for kneeing and gets a fine wow who's surprised.
Vickary gets 2 weeks for a bump where there was a accidental head clash
Fyfe gets off 2 charges with a fine and no case but if he gets fined again this year ineligible for Brownlow
The MRP have no clue it's a lottery

Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2015 7:52 pm
by perthmagpie
Lenny Hayes in drawn GF did the knee in same away into Swanny. Free kick only.

Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2015 7:53 pm
by droversdog65
It's not a lottery qm, it's driven by the AFL - always has been, always will be.

I can remember williams getting off the year he won the brownlow, this is nothing new.

Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2015 8:05 pm
by MatthewBoydFanClub
qldmagpie67 wrote:Ok so Adams gets 2 weeks maybe fair but I thought 1 would have done going on what's been given nothing this year thus far.
Now they say Schultz should have been given 2 weeks on his sling tackle the week before which the AFL could have done last Tuesday and suspended him then but no his free to play against us.
Mitchell gets sighted for a3rd time in 2yrs for kneeing and gets a fine wow who's surprised.
Vickary gets 2 weeks for a bump where there was a accidental head clash
Fyfe gets off 2 charges with a fine and no case but if he gets fined again this year ineligible for Brownlow
The MRP have no clue it's a lottery
Also, you could have mentioned Varcoe who got fined last week for having Rioli duck his head into Varcoe's body. Rioli said after that game, there was nothing in the incident. I wish Varcoe had taken that to appeal.

Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2015 8:30 pm
by warburton lad
Can't see what all the whinging is about??

The AFL impose the rules equally across all 17 clubs, but wait, there is an 18th club, us!!!

Sick of this crap.

Watch the replay of the Hawthorn game and see the whinging of Mitchell when Elliott collects him.... Glad he missed the Brownlow the other year- hardly the fairest cat going around...

Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2015 8:32 pm
by Dave The Man
warburton lad wrote:Can't see what all the whinging is about??

The AFL impose the rules equally across all 17 clubs, but wait, there is an 18th club, us!!!

Sick of this crap.

Watch the replay of the Hawthorn game and see the whinging of Mitchell when Elliott collects him.... Glad he missed the Brownlow the other year- hardly the fairest cat going around...
Agree - The Dog Sam Mitchell is seems okay to let him run around giving Players Corkies :evil:

Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2015 8:34 pm
by Clifton Hill-Billy
MRP chook lotto continues, as does unsociable footy. Why bother with a framework to guide penalties given, if the process of applying a penalty is completely random- or in the case Mitchell or Fyfe not random at all.

Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2015 8:49 pm
by roar
I like Mitchell and am glad Adams has a bit of Mitchell about his play.

Wasn't a good look for the game so maybe a fine would have been ok but 2 weeks is way overs, IMO.

Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2015 8:50 pm
by Dave The Man

Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2015 8:52 pm
by HAL
roar wrote:I like Mitchell and am glad Adams has a bit of Mitchell about his play.

Wasn't a good look for the game so maybe a fine would have been ok but 2 weeks is way overs, IMO.
You like Mitchell and am glad Adams has Mitchell about his play.

Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2015 9:03 pm
by King Monkey
Good on Adams for not putting up with that sh1t.
Perhaps next time a stiff palm in the chest or something though young fella.

To many weasels doing weaselly little things these days and receiving no retribution because overt aggression has been weaned out of footy.
It's a shame we're in an era where the sniper and the smart arse are protected species.

What Sam Mitchell did was weak as piss.
Raising a knee like he did to avoid being bumped is worse than jumping out of the way.

Adams gets 2 for a knee, Mitchell uses a knee every 2

Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2015 9:05 pm
by princem007
I had to laugh at the Mrp decision , Adams cops 2 weeks for a errant knee while Mitchell intentionally uses a knee to injure opponents every second week.

The one wearing black and white gets 2 weeks.

The one in poop and piss gets a $1000 fine.

It's a absolute joke and to think we have 2 ex pie players on panel, they are doing us no favours, maybe they think they would be seen as favouring I don't know.

Buddy franklin can go around knockin out players and gets a week.

Schulz can sling tackle and knock out a block and get off.

Now they say they got it wrong but after he was free to play pies!

Cmon give me a break, the afl is against the pies from the umpiring to the mrp to robbing our club of money to prop up clubs who cry poor from our hard earned profits.

Afl can go get stuffed.