Who should Collingwood look at for next season?
Moderator: bbmods
- magpie_mendies
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2002 6:01 pm
- Location: Melbourne,Victoria,Australia
- Johnson#26
- Posts: 24763
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2003 6:54 am
- Rhyno2004
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 12:52 pm
- Location: left of the centre
- Johnson#26
- Posts: 24763
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2003 6:54 am
-
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 3:23 pm
Some interesting names that have been thrown up are Ottens, Hodge and Crawford. Most of the rest are pie in the sky eg. Judd, Ball, del Santo(get real) or useless.
Ottens is a real potential star with obvious injury and motivation problems. Richmond need a ruckman so the only trade bait that is viable from Collingwood would be Richards and an extra such as say Swan or Nixon.
Crawford is a champ but near the end of his career and possibly permanently limited by his back. Still they would require a reasonable trade eg. Presti .(arguably, Presti is dispensible with Walker taking over his role).
Hodge bad OP with recovery problematic. If he recovers he will be good and on that basis Hawthorn will require a reasonable trade eg. O'bree and 2nd round.
The advantage of Ottens over Richards is immediate efficacy rather than looking to 2006 and later for Richards to reach his potential. Richmond is going into rebuilding phase and may contemplate a 2006 maturing Richards and kids that have shown some potential eg. Swan/Nixon.
Hawthorn is also going into re-building and may therefore be willing to trade Crawford. Presti with 3-4 years left is reasonable value.
The advantage of having Ottens and Crawford is that given a reasonable run with injuries, it would place us as premiership contenders immediately. Crawford is coming into the discount age in terms of salary cap and the trade of Presti would offset. Similarly, Hodge's salary cap would be offset by O'bree.
However Ottens would significantly increase our cap. Maybe Wakelin is coming into the 1/2 cap range. Alternatively, we have to offload some players eg. Kinnear, Williams, McKee. Where contracts are a problem, perhaps we can offer a sweetener eg. Kinnear and Shakleton for taking over Kinnear's contract.
Ottens is a real potential star with obvious injury and motivation problems. Richmond need a ruckman so the only trade bait that is viable from Collingwood would be Richards and an extra such as say Swan or Nixon.
Crawford is a champ but near the end of his career and possibly permanently limited by his back. Still they would require a reasonable trade eg. Presti .(arguably, Presti is dispensible with Walker taking over his role).
Hodge bad OP with recovery problematic. If he recovers he will be good and on that basis Hawthorn will require a reasonable trade eg. O'bree and 2nd round.
The advantage of Ottens over Richards is immediate efficacy rather than looking to 2006 and later for Richards to reach his potential. Richmond is going into rebuilding phase and may contemplate a 2006 maturing Richards and kids that have shown some potential eg. Swan/Nixon.
Hawthorn is also going into re-building and may therefore be willing to trade Crawford. Presti with 3-4 years left is reasonable value.
The advantage of having Ottens and Crawford is that given a reasonable run with injuries, it would place us as premiership contenders immediately. Crawford is coming into the discount age in terms of salary cap and the trade of Presti would offset. Similarly, Hodge's salary cap would be offset by O'bree.
However Ottens would significantly increase our cap. Maybe Wakelin is coming into the 1/2 cap range. Alternatively, we have to offload some players eg. Kinnear, Williams, McKee. Where contracts are a problem, perhaps we can offer a sweetener eg. Kinnear and Shakleton for taking over Kinnear's contract.
Beware the embrace of the collingwood python
- Johnson#26
- Posts: 24763
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2003 6:54 am
- Daks
- Posts: 3243
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 5:57 pm
- Location: Melbourne.
- Contact:
- themonk
- Posts: 2225
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 4:12 pm
We should throw everything at Dal Santo, a class midfielder, has the potential to be better than Simon Black.
We may have the following to play with, pick7, 23, O'Bree, Davis, Lockyer, Walker, MCG, Woewodin?
would Freo give up their 1st round pick for Woewodin & Walker?
would the Saints accept pick 7 & pick 11 for Dal Santo?
Another interesting player would be Travis Johnstone, O'Bree & a pick may be enough to secure him.
Dal Santo & Johnstone into our midfield would be sensational.
We may have the following to play with, pick7, 23, O'Bree, Davis, Lockyer, Walker, MCG, Woewodin?
would Freo give up their 1st round pick for Woewodin & Walker?
would the Saints accept pick 7 & pick 11 for Dal Santo?
Another interesting player would be Travis Johnstone, O'Bree & a pick may be enough to secure him.
Dal Santo & Johnstone into our midfield would be sensational.
- Johnson#26
- Posts: 24763
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2003 6:54 am
- Daks
- Posts: 3243
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 5:57 pm
- Location: Melbourne.
- Contact:
Be realitstic mate. Sydney would be stupid to get rid of O'Keefe who is one of their most important players at the moment. And idon't even bother mentioning Harris.. he will be the Roo's number one priority - without him, they'd be in trouble once their guns retire.magpie_mendies wrote:Ryan O'keefe from Sydney and Daniel HArris from North
Looking towards more realistic trades... I agree with Johnson#26 - we should really try and target Ladhams... he has some real pace and skill that we could do with. Even try looking at Ben Haynes from Essendonn, Nathan Lonie and Rick Ladson from Hawthorn.
-
- Posts: 2434
- Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 12:44 pm
- Location: Buninyong
Good post, erniedog, but I wouldn't be taking either Ottens or Crawford in a fit. Ottens is vastly over-rated and Crawford is injury prone. We've just come off a year with injuries stuffing us right up, so why would you want to take the risk on another bloke with serious injury problems?
but to clarify your question:
This year we have Bucks and next year, Burns also qualifies. Waklein hasn't been here anywhere near long enough.
but to clarify your question:
No. Players have to be 30 and with the club for 10 years before qualifying for the veteran's list and salary cap relief.erniedog wrote: Maybe Wakelin is coming into the 1/2 cap range.
This year we have Bucks and next year, Burns also qualifies. Waklein hasn't been here anywhere near long enough.
Glory Glory Good Old Collingwood, Glory Glory Hallelujah,
Collingwood's The Greatest Team The World Has Ever Seen,
And The 'Pies Go Marching On (in Black and White Stripes Forever!).
Collingwood's The Greatest Team The World Has Ever Seen,
And The 'Pies Go Marching On (in Black and White Stripes Forever!).
- Johnson#26
- Posts: 24763
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2003 6:54 am
Haynes wold be a great get! I would love him at Collingwood as he has pace and skill. Matthew Bode is a decent footballer, and Hayden Skipworth is a handy player. Michael Doughty from Adelaide is a solid player. Kasy Green from WCE or Kane Munro or Chad Morrison? I agree Daks, Kane would be a good choice.Daks wrote:Looking towards more realistic trades... I agree with Johnson#26 - we should really try and target Ladhams... he has some real pace and skill that we could do with. Even try looking at Ben Haynes from Essendonn, Nathan Lonie and Rick Ladson from Hawthorn.
- Cam
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2002 6:01 pm
- Location: Springvale
- Has liked: 19 times
- Been liked: 28 times
I can't believe i'm saying this... but maybe Travis Johnstone could we what we need. Bugger off all the McCough fans we seriously need people who will enable us to take advantage of Rocca and Tarrant. Johnstone hitting them on the chest would do that. Give the Dees McCough and Crow if need be.
Get back on top.