Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 6:31 pm
Yes heard her on 3AW too. Sounds promising.
Caro = showbag. She thought she was right about something once, but was mistaken.
I'll wait and see.
Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board
This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.
https://nick.magpies.net/
The "What do we get for Beams?" thread
Page 12 of 67
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 6:35 pm
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 6:37 pm
So Lumumba or Greenwood tomorrow? Going out on a limb isn't she.
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 6:39 pm
Well if it's another journalists story then something might be known tonight on one of the newspaper sites.
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 6:44 pm
Caro was first to break the news of Hird's sacking last week.
Only problem was, he wasn't sacked...
Only problem was, he wasn't sacked...
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 6:51 pm
She needs something to go right for the sake of her credibility!
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 6:51 pm
only cos they have a weak board. now, if anyone wants to see a club in crisis that is the perfect example.warburton lad wrote:Caro was first to break the news of Hird's sacking last week.
Only problem was, he wasn't sacked...
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 6:52 pm
A pure hypothetical.
Beams, pick*34 to Brisbane.
Pick 5, Lumumba and Merrett to Melbourne.
Pick 2 and 25 to pies.
*Pick received for Mitch Clarke
Beams, pick*34 to Brisbane.
Pick 5, Lumumba and Merrett to Melbourne.
Pick 2 and 25 to pies.
*Pick received for Mitch Clarke
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 6:52 pm
She's been right all along about Essendon however in terms of the sacking the board got legal advice that they could be sued & likely successfully. The legal case has seen her right about Essendon from nearly 2 years ago - it supported her views all the way.warburton lad wrote:Caro was first to break the news of Hird's sacking last week.
Only problem was, he wasn't sacked...
Hird's lawyers outsmarted Essendon in last week. Appeal to happen so then we'll all see.
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 6:54 pm
Like she is Blaming someone else
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 6:55 pm
Rejectedswoop42 wrote:A pure hypothetical.
Beams, pick*34 to Brisbane.
Pick 5, Lumumba and Merrett to Melbourne.
Pick 2 and 25 to pies.
*Pick received for Mitch Clarke
.Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 6:56 pm
She might have been right all along but the fact remains she went with the story too early & made herself look silly. Better to be sure you're right than sure you're first.watt price tully wrote:She's been right all along about Essendon however in terms of the sacking the board got legal advice that they could be sued & likely successfully. The legal case has seen her right about Essendon from nearly 2 years ago - it supported her views all along the way.warburton lad wrote:Caro was first to break the news of Hird's sacking last week.
Only problem was, he wasn't sacked...
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 6:56 pm
correct. i would like to see just one thread that mentions caro to be free from character assassination. nothing new ever gets said when this occurs.watt price tully wrote:She's been right all along about Essendon however in terms of the sacking the board got legal advice that they could be sued & likely successfully. The legal case has seen her right about Essendon from nearly 2 years ago - it supported her views all the way.warburton lad wrote:Caro was first to break the news of Hird's sacking last week.
Only problem was, he wasn't sacked...
Hird's lawyers outsmarted Essendon in last week. Appeal to happen so then we'll all see.
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 6:57 pm
She hasn't blamed anyone DTM re Essendon except Hird - saying quite rightly from the outset that he should've stood down & taken responsibility - which he hasn't (anyway this is for another thread)Dave The Man wrote:Like she is Blaming someone else
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 6:58 pm
Hopefully we do well out of this if it is true that is, if Collingwood has struck a deal.