Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board

AN_Inkling wrote:

swoop42 wrote:A pure hypothetical.

Beams, pick*34 to Brisbane.

Pick 5, Lumumba and Merrett to Melbourne.

Pick 2 and 25 to pies.

*Pick received for Mitch Clarke

Rejected .

No thanks. Beams deal has to be in it's own and a player must be involved. Greenwood deal is in isolation also. For a brief moment we carry the whip hand.

She's certainly not the worst journo, just not sure she's on the money about Beams.
I actually enjoy when she sticks it up the AFL...

I'd be surprised if a deal's done as early as tomorrow. If so, it had better be a good one, 'cause that's not much of a hold out.

jdpie1970 wrote:

AN_Inkling wrote:

swoop42 wrote:A pure hypothetical.

Beams, pick*34 to Brisbane.

Pick 5, Lumumba and Merrett to Melbourne.

Pick 2 and 25 to pies.

*Pick received for Mitch Clarke

Rejected .

No thanks. Beams deal has to be in it's own and a player must be involved. Greenwood deal is in isolation also. For a brief moment we carry the whip hand.

Effectively with that we get two unknowns. I think the club is right to demand Redden or Aish as well as pick 5 from the Bruisedbum Liars. I see where the value is with pick 2, but would prefer Redden and pick 5.

Lepitch on twitter said redden going nowhere.

If it's not pick 5 and player the calibre if aish, rich or redden I'll be pissed.

Pick 2 and 25 is 90% compo for beams. I'd take that as a worst case scenario.

PS, I like Caro too. Not in the religious sense, but certainly in a 'keep the bastards honest' kinda way! I love her stance on James Turd.

Fatui Attata wrote:PS, I like Caro too. Not in the religious sense, but certainly in a 'keep the bastards honest' kinda way! I love her stance on James Turd.

Don't like her at all......but

Did like her fact checking and calling pendles / Elliot re club and bucks and
Luv the stand on hird

MJ23 wrote:Lepitch on twitter said redden going nowhere.

If it's not pick 5 and player the calibre if aish, rich or redden I'll be pissed.

Pick 2 and 25 is 90% compo for beams. I'd take that as a worst case scenario.

Does that mean you'd be 90% satisfied with this outcome - which is pretty good really if that is the case for a worst case scenario unless I've misinterpreted you.

Maybe he's just a very tough negotiator .

AN_Inkling wrote:

swoop42 wrote:A pure hypothetical.

Beams, pick*34 to Brisbane.

Pick 5, Lumumba and Merrett to Melbourne.

Pick 2 and 25 to pies.

*Pick received for Mitch Clarke

Rejected .

Personally i think this is a fair trade for all parties and pick 2 shouldn't be sniffed at.

It would either land us Petracca or give us the option between Brayshaw or McCartin.

Bribane lose pick 5, 25, Merrett
Brisbane gain Beams, pick 34

Melbourne lose pick 2, 34
Melbourne gain pick 5, Lumumba, Merrett

Collingwood lose Beams
Collingwood gain pick 2, 25

swoop42 wrote:

AN_Inkling wrote:

swoop42 wrote:A pure hypothetical.

Beams, pick*34 to Brisbane.

Pick 5, Lumumba and Merrett to Melbourne.

Pick 2 and 25 to pies.

*Pick received for Mitch Clarke

Rejected .

Personally i think this is a fair trade for all parties and pick 2 shouldn't be sniffed at.

It would either land us Petracca or give us the option between Brayshaw or McCartin.

Bribane lose pick 5, 25, Merrett
Brisbane gain Beams, pick 34

Melbourne lose pick 2, 34
Melbourne gain pick 5, Lumumba, Merrett

Collingwood lose Beams
Collingwood gain pick 2, 25

I don't think there is enough in it for Brisbane in that scenario - but I like it

watt price tully wrote:

MJ23 wrote:Lepitch on twitter said redden going nowhere.

If it's not pick 5 and player the calibre if aish, rich or redden I'll be pissed.

Pick 2 and 25 is 90% compo for beams. I'd take that as a worst case scenario.

Does that mean you'd be 90% satisfied with this outcome - which is pretty good really if that is the case for a worst case scenario unless I've misinterpreted you.

Yes not rapt but could live with it.
Only because it would give us the choice between Brayshaw or McCarthy.

John Wren wrote:

watt price tully wrote:

warburton lad wrote:Caro was first to break the news of Hird's sacking last week.

Only problem was, he wasn't sacked...

She's been right all along about Essendon however in terms of the sacking the board got legal advice that they could be sued & likely successfully. The legal case has seen her right about Essendon from nearly 2 years ago - it supported her views all the way.

Hird's lawyers outsmarted Essendon in last week. Appeal to happen so then we'll all see.

correct. i would like to see just one thread that mentions caro to be free from character assassination. nothing new ever gets said when this occurs.

When she stops confusing opinion pieces with facts, that might happen.

stui magpie wrote:

John Wren wrote:

watt price tully wrote: She's been right all along about Essendon however in terms of the sacking the board got legal advice that they could be sued & likely successfully. The legal case has seen her right about Essendon from nearly 2 years ago - it supported her views all the way.

Hird's lawyers outsmarted Essendon in last week. Appeal to happen so then we'll all see.

correct. i would like to see just one thread that mentions caro to be free from character assassination. nothing new ever gets said when this occurs.

When she stops confusing opinion pieces with facts, that might happen.

That can be applied to most journalists at one time or another. What JW is referring to extends beyond this.

Greg Davis reports:

Brisbane : Beams
North : pick 25
Collingwood : Pick 5, Greenwood

I'd take it.