Page 14 of 67

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:05 pm
by MJ23
Wokko wrote:Greg Davis reports:

Brisbane : Beams
North : pick 25
Collingwood : Pick 5, Greenwood

I'd take it.
I wouldn't.
Could we not just use our second round pick for Levi or the pick we get from H ?
Brisb should be giving up more or manufacturing a gws player from patfull

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:05 pm
by Fatui Attata
watt price tully wrote:
swoop42 wrote:
AN_Inkling wrote: Rejected ;).
Personally i think this is a fair trade for all parties and pick 2 shouldn't be sniffed at.

It would either land us Petracca :wink: or give us the option between Brayshaw or McCartin.

Bribane lose pick 5, 25, Merrett
Brisbane gain Beams, pick 34

Melbourne lose pick 2, 34
Melbourne gain pick 5, Lumumba, Merrett

Collingwood lose Beams
Collingwood gain pick 2, 25
I don't think there is enough in it for Brisbane in that scenario - but I like it
Coulda said it "has Merrett"

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:10 pm
by Museman
Wokko wrote:Greg Davis reports:

Brisbane : Beams
North : pick 25
Collingwood : Pick 5, Greenwood

I'd take it.
Bears get off easy, we did the grind work on Greenwood, tell them to find us another 2nd rnd pick via Merret or Patfull that they can upgrade our 3rd rnd pick with.....

Wouldn't do these ^&$ flogs any favours whatsoever.

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:11 pm
by swoop42
Who's Greg Davis?

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:11 pm
by Ev5Magpies
Wokko wrote:Greg Davis reports:

Brisbane : Beams
North : pick 25
Collingwood : Pick 5, Greenwood

I'd take it.
No way! We'd get Greenwood without the bears involved. I like the pick 2 & 25 if the dees get involved.

Otherwise GWS option with Treloar, but doubt that'll come off.

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:15 pm
by Az
MJ23 wrote:
Wokko wrote:Greg Davis reports:

Brisbane : Beams
North : pick 25
Collingwood : Pick 5, Greenwood

I'd take it.
I wouldn't.
Could we not just use our second round pick for Levi or the pick we get from H ?
Brisb should be giving up more or manufacturing a gws player from patfull
Exactly. Fuq that, we are getting what we sought out for last Friday. We certainly don't need Brisbane's help to get Greenwood. If the Pies end up kneeling to these ass hats, I would have to reconsider my membership for 2015. Not sure how Caro thinks we've reached a deal considering both sides are publicly at odds over the deal as of less than 24 hours ago? Hope that excuse for a journalist has got it right though.

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:17 pm
by Wokko
Your sentiments seem to come from wanting to screw the Lions rather than trying to get a good deal. if Pick 5 + Redden who wasn't even in Brisbane's B&F top ten would get it done, but pick 5 + Norfs equal 2nd in the B&F wouldn't be enough then something here doesn't add up.

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:17 pm
by Breadcrawl
swoop42 wrote:A pure hypothetical.

Beams, pick*34 to Brisbane.

Pick 5, Lumumba and Merrett to Melbourne.

Pick 2 and 25 to pies.

*Pick received for Mitch Clarke
Two of the likely top 4 are talls.

This means that the third best mid in the draft, at worst, will be available at pick 5.

You can't know that Petracca and Brayshaw are going to be so much better than the next guy that it is worth tipping in what you are suggesting to get pick 2.

It costs Hine another good chance to find a ripping player

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:19 pm
by Bucks2014
Wokko wrote:Greg Davis reports:

Brisbane : Beams
North : pick 25
Collingwood : Pick 5, Greenwood

I'd take it.
Hope Brisbane don't actually think this could get done. It's only a win for them. How do we get a fair deal?

Greenwood for pick 22 from Melbourne for H.

I have faith in the Pies recruiting team, apparently there are 2 other clubs involved, so if Brisbane really want Dayne they best give us a decent player plus pick 5 which should be pick 4.

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:19 pm
by John Wren
swoop42 wrote:Who's Greg Davis?
courier-mail.

http://www.couriermail.com.au/sport/afl ... 3a751a333c

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:19 pm
by HAL
Wokko wrote:Your sentiments seem to come from wanting to screw the Lions rather than trying to get a good deal. if Pick 5 + Redden who wasn't even in Brisbane's B&F top ten would get it done, but pick 5 + Norfs equal 2nd in the B&F wouldn't be enough then something here doesn't add up.
I bet you say that to everyone.

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:19 pm
by swoop42
Wokko wrote:Greg Davis reports:

Brisbane : Beams
North : pick 25
Collingwood : Pick 5, Greenwood

I'd take it.
Link or it didn't happen.

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:23 pm
by The Boy Who Cried Wolf
swoop42 wrote:
Wokko wrote:Greg Davis reports:

Brisbane : Beams
North : pick 25
Collingwood : Pick 5, Greenwood

I'd take it.
Link or it didn't happen.
JW's post above has it.

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:24 pm
by Wokko
I still don't understand how Redden + 5 is enough but Greenwood + 5 isn't. Why should we use our Pick 22 on Greenwood if we can get him for Brisbane's pick 25 instead of trying to hustle them for a player who might not even want to come here.

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:25 pm
by Neil Appleby
warburton lad wrote:Caro was first to break the news of Hird's sacking last week.

Only problem was, he wasn't sacked...
Well actually he was WL, but they got cold feet and changed their minds.