Collingwood Father Son and NGA Radar

This is a Collingwood Bulletin Board - use this forum for general, Pies-related topics. For other footy topics, use Nick's Other AFL forum, and for non-footy sporting topics please use Nick's Sports Bar. For non-sporting topics please use the Victoria Park Tavern.

Moderator: bbmods

Post Reply
User avatar
dalyc
Posts: 2883
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 8:58 pm
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 12 times

Post by dalyc »

I'm hope the club has this in hand. If the boys start performing like top picks, they'll surely get calf soreness later in the season.
Four legged animals good, two legged animals better
AN_Inkling
Posts: 13521
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am

Post by AN_Inkling »

dalyc wrote:I'm hope the club has this in hand. If the boys start performing like top picks, they'll surely get calf soreness later in the season.
This new father-son bidding system is annoying, isn't it? We want these players to be good but not until after the bidding process! Bring back the days when we could get a Cloke or an Ablett for a third round pick and build a great side because of it.
Well done boys!
qldmagpie67
Posts: 6077
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:41 pm
Been liked: 118 times

Post by qldmagpie67 »

AN_Inkling wrote:
qldmagpie67 wrote:I guess if we need to find a trade or 2 to get some picks Thomas may be available as we seem to have several like for like
Another who comes to mind is Marley as we have several HBF most have better skills than him. Can't see us trading away Cloke or Witts really nor can I see us giving up Keefe 200+ cm KPP don't grow on trees and if he played CHB would free up Reid to play CHF or Keefe could play FB at a pinch Reid at CHB if Brown was injured.
I just couldn't or wouldn't want to see either at another club. Both are small but both are skilful something we could do with especially Josh who is apparently a good goal sneak and crumber
Of course we could trade Witts. We tried to do it last year and only kept him because he was adamant about staying. Now that Cox looks to be coming on it becomes even more likely that he'd be traded. If we feel Cox is the goods then we pretty much have to trade Witts unless he has an outstanding year. Stockpiling three promising rucks is a bit of a waste if we can improve other areas by a trade.

Cloke is a different story, we don't yet have one replacement for him let alone two. Only way a trade happens there is if we can find a quality ready made and young KPP in return. Like hen's teeth they are.

Either way it looks as if Brown and Daicos won't be attracting early picks, so it's not likely we'll need to do much trading to secure them. I doubt either is worth a Cloke or Wiits, that's for sure.
Good points Inky but would you consider trading someone like Keefe or Thomas or Williams to secure picks or use as trade bait to get back inside the top 10 -12 to see if we can't land a decent young tall ?
For mine he have an over abundance of HBF adding Scharenberg into th mix might allow us to trade say a Williams & Thomas. I wonder how much off the pace both Keefe and Thomas might be after 2yrs out but both are young so times on there side
AN_Inkling
Posts: 13521
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am

Post by AN_Inkling »

Keeffe's a very useful asset. A giant at 204cm who can play both ends and has good foot skills. He's had two years to work on his main weakness: strength. If he comes back with a decent amount of extra muscle he could be very handy. After sticking with him through two years of suspension, we won't be trading him unless he stinks it up on return.

Thomas could be decent depth, but he was always a fringe player, two years out won't have helped that. At the trade table he wouldn't have a lot of value so he's probably worth more to keep.

We could trade a half back if we needed to. It's not something we need to do though, because the game is made up of runners now, those runners can be on half back or in the midfield and you need a lot of them.

In going after Brown and/or Daicos, I think it's unlikely we'd need to or want to trade players who are part of our established 22 like Williams. That takes us backwards and we've done enough of that over the last few years. If we traded established players we'd look for one in return. For Daics or Brown we'd trade a second rounder from next year if we had to or players near the bottom of our list. That's assuming their stocks don't rise massively in the next few months. If they do (I don't think there's much chance given their size) we're in a very difficult situation, because trading out established players for rookies is not a good move at this point.
Well done boys!
qldmagpie67
Posts: 6077
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:41 pm
Been liked: 118 times

Post by qldmagpie67 »

AN_Inkling wrote:Keeffe's a very useful asset. A giant at 204cm who can play both ends and has good foot skills. He's had two years to work on his main weakness: strength. If he comes back with a decent amount of extra muscle he could be very handy. After sticking with him through two years of suspension, we won't be trading him unless he stinks it up on return.

Thomas could be decent depth, but he was always a fringe player, two years out won't have helped that. At the trade table he wouldn't have a lot of value so he's probably worth more to keep.

We could trade a half back if we needed to. It's not something we need to do though, because the game is made up of runners now, those runners can be on half back or in the midfield and you need a lot of them.

In going after Brown and/or Daicos, I think it's unlikely we'd need to or want to trade players who are part of our established 22 like Williams. That takes us backwards and we've done enough of that over the last few years. If we traded established players we'd look for one in return. For Daics or Brown we'd trade a second rounder from next year if we had to or players near the bottom of our list. That's assuming their stocks don't rise massively in the next few months. If they do (I don't think there's much chance given their size) we're in a very difficult situation, because trading out established players for rookies is not a good move at this point.
Again Inky all good points. I was playing devils advocate some what. We are short on pure runners like the Smiths & Hills
Thomas to me is obsolete to our needs. He's neither quick nor overly skilful and wouldn't command much at the draft table other than depth to a club but might get us a late 2nd rd or 3rd rd pick which may come in handy to ensure we get both Brown & Daicos
This forum would go into melt down if we didn't draft both these kids (providing they show enough that they are AFL chances with further development)
Keefe is interesting for mine. His body has been a issue. 204cm players don't grow on trees. We have already invested time into developing him and he can play either end but so can Reid so having 2 swing man could be very handy and actually makes Brown's position in terms of bargaining power (he's off contact) not as powerful
Will be interesting to see which way we go
We need speed to compliment Varcoe and Sidey. If Swanny doesn't play on we have enough mids and will have cap space to go after someone
Also Cloke has triggered a 5th season but the money will be half according to news reports so again that's around $400k more cap space.
If we can some how find a way to get into a position to grab a first round pick inside the top 10 (knowing our first pick goes to GWS) and go after the most skilful and quickest player left like a Jarrod Berry or Andrew McGrath or Jonty Scharenberg (Matts younger brother)
All have above average skills and line busting turns of speed. Any of those 3 would be great. I'm a big rap on Berry a big body courageous rebounding HB and sensational intercept mark. Young Scharenberg is very interesting as well similar to his brother but is quicker and has elite endurance and is a ball winner. Noted tackler as well
User avatar
Pies4shaw
Posts: 34886
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:14 pm
Has liked: 136 times
Been liked: 182 times

Post by Pies4shaw »

I'd trade Williams in a heartbeat for anything useful - but I doubt that he'd bring much in the way of bids.

I don't understand at all why people on here accepted that Heater could be traded and openly contemplate trading one of the best KPFs to play for the Club for a stale packet of potato chips, yet struggle to contemplate parting with a fast, one-sided under-skilled player because he's "best 22".

Keeffe's absence has been very damaging. I don't know what I think about keeping him and Thomas, save that, so far, they've been part of the problem, rather than part of the solution. We do need quality, experienced KPPs, though. Brown and Reid need back-up and, forward of centre, we have one (is it uncontroversial to at least describe him as?) moderately well-performed KPF - he's in the seconds, so there's obviously a "position vacant" sign hanging out for any established quality player who can grab a few marks and kick a few goals. That sign has been up since Dawes got injured 5 seasons ago and, so far, none of the successful applicants has been able to perform to the required standard.
AN_Inkling
Posts: 13521
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am

Post by AN_Inkling »

Pies4shaw wrote:^
Any trade for Williams would have to be for a similarly established player was my point. That goes for any player getting regular games (Cloke as well). Trading for a draft pick isn't worthwhile at this stage of our development. The Shaw trade fit in very well with our rebuild/regeneration.
Well done boys!
AN_Inkling
Posts: 13521
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am

Post by AN_Inkling »

Pies4shaw wrote:I'd trade Williams in a heartbeat for anything useful - but I doubt that he'd bring much in the way of bids.

I don't understand at all why people on here accepted that Heater could be traded and openly contemplate trading one of the best KPFs to play for the Club for a stale packet of potato chips, yet struggle to contemplate parting with a fast, one-sided under-skilled player because he's "best 22".

Keeffe's absence has been very damaging. I don't know what I think about keeping him and Thomas, save that, so far, they've been part of the problem, rather than part of the solution. We do need quality, experienced KPPs, though. Brown and Reid need back-up and, forward of centre, we have one (is it uncontroversial to at least describe him as?) moderately well-performed KPF - he's in the seconds, so there's obviously a "position vacant" sign hanging out for any established quality player who can grab a few marks and kick a few goals. That sign has been up since Dawes got injured 5 seasons ago and, so far, none of the successful applicants has been able to perform to the required standard.
Any trade for Williams would have to be for a similarly established player was my point. That goes for any player getting regular games (Cloke as well). Trading for a draft pick isn't worthwhile at this stage of our development. The Shaw trade fit in very well with our rebuild/regeneration.
Well done boys!
User avatar
HAL
Posts: 45105
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2003 2:10 pm
Been liked: 3 times
Contact:

Post by HAL »

Oh. What about after its done?
duke750
Posts: 274
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:18 am
Location: Buderim QLD

Post by duke750 »

It's interesting that our backline has 4 left footers who are all effectively one-sided and exposed when caught on their right foot. Reid doesn't appear to be too much of a liability, and Brown is marginal. Now that Toovey has lost a bit of pace he can look really lost on his wrong side. Williams has had a good couple of seasons where his pace and mongrel served him well, but he has lost some edge and from what I've seen this year he gets caught too often in no mans land.

I have said previously that Toovey, as a premiership player, should become a mentor for young players in the VFL. If Keefe comes back OK Brown might need to play that role at the club too.

Williams becomes redundant if some of the younger running backs develop as they should, including Sharenberg.

Like most people on this forum I will be really disappointed if a young Daicos or Brown ends up at another club; even more so if they turn into good footballers. However, I strongly believe that our recruiting focus must be on a young, strong KPF to help set up a potent forward line that will serve us for a number of years.
Magpies forever.
First Colligwood game: Western Oval 1960
User avatar
On the March
Posts: 1858
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2004 2:23 pm
Been liked: 2 times

Post by On the March »

Our recruiters would have known these guys were coming, had a fair idea of their worth and planned accordingly :)
User avatar
Dave The Man
Posts: 45001
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 21 times
Contact:

Post by Dave The Man »

Josh Daicos Broke his Hand and is out for at least 6 weeks
I am Da Man
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

Dave The Man wrote:Josh Daicos Broke his Hand and is out for at least 6 weeks
Who let our fitness and medical staff go to the TAC game?
AN_Inkling
Posts: 13521
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:29 am

Post by AN_Inkling »

jackcass wrote:^
This could be good news.
Well done boys!
User avatar
Woods Of Ypres
Posts: 3141
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 3:29 pm
Location: Yugoslavia
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 7 times

Post by Woods Of Ypres »

Dave The Man wrote:Josh Daicos Broke his Hand and is out for at least 6 weeks
the kid is definitely a magpie
Post Reply