Page 187 of 271

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 3:10 pm
by ANNODAM
TimetoFly wrote:Gawn to the scum.... All Done and dusted now from what I have heard today


You need to reveal your source.
Otherwise, why come on here sprouting shit?

I believe Travis will stay!

I know MM is going to the Scum, I have already said who my source is numerous times, an ex-Scum 1995 Premiership player.
The only hitch they have atm though, is half the board want Rats, the other doesn't, once they agree, MM will go.

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 3:14 pm
by The Prototype
Adz wrote:From whom?
Probably from Paul Connors' brothers postman.

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 3:59 pm
by Pa Marmo
Time to fly, still waiting on the corroborating evidence on your Trav is gone claims, any chance of filling us all in?

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:00 pm
by Deja Vu
Nick - Pie Man wrote:
Deja Vu wrote:Surely contravening this regulation should result in the offending club being banned from signing the player?
Yeah, at least that. Take away a couple of draft picks too for good measure.

$100k wouldn't hurt a club like ours. It rains money at the Lexus Centre
Mate, 100K wouldn't hurt North Melbourne!

Seriously, if you could sign a marquee player mid-season, your supporters would be so happy that they would pass the hat around and cover the fine themselves.

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:09 pm
by Deja Vu
Nash Rising wrote:
ClokingDevice wrote:
Piesnchess wrote:ONLY Travis knows if Travis is staying, and Demir naturally. !
The club and players are acting as if they know
But I bet you don't have any real (as opposed to imagined) examples
No, but I bet he has real opinions. Is that OK with you?

Do you know something we all don't?

People will be proven right or wrong in due course. It will be interesting to see who admits they were wrong and who is prepared to apologise.

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:21 pm
by ClokingDevice
Nash Rising wrote:
ClokingDevice wrote:
Piesnchess wrote:ONLY Travis knows if Travis is staying, and Demir naturally. !
The club and players are acting as if they know
But I bet you don't have any real (as opposed to imagined) examples
They've all been real, there isn't a single person in the media or otherwise that doesn't think Walsh and Beams were speaking indirectly to Cloke and expressing their frustration at him.. we all wish and hope he stays.. but in the words of Billy Bob.. "wish in one hand and shit in the other and see which one fills up first"

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:29 pm
by TimetoFly
Deja Vu wrote:Well it can't be done and dusted as that would be in breach of AFL regulations wouldn't it?
Yeah cause ablett and scully wwas never done until the season was over :roll:

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:31 pm
by TimetoFly
Pa Marmo wrote:Time to fly, still waiting on the corroborating evidence on your Trav is gone claims, any chance of filling us all in?
I mentioned my source a few ago and I am not going to abused any longer.. So just wait and see shall we

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:38 pm
by 4everpies
TimetoFly wrote:
Pa Marmo wrote:Time to fly, still waiting on the corroborating evidence on your Trav is gone claims, any chance of filling us all in?
I mentioned my source a few ago and I am not going to abused any longer.. So just wait and see shall we
Paul Connors brother, I belive you said.

Although I would have thought that Paul Connors would not jeopardise his good working relationships with AFL clubs by passing on this sort of info to his brother, or anyone.

Does nobody have any concept of confidentiality in the workplace???

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:59 pm
by TimetoFly
Pa Marmo wrote:
TimetoFly wrote:
Pa Marmo wrote:Time to fly, still waiting on the corroborating evidence on your Trav is gone claims, any chance of filling us all in?
I mentioned my source a few ago and I am not going to abused any longer.. So just wait and see shall we
If you think my post is abuse, you better take back your offer to fight the rocket, because your a pussy.
Nah buddy I never said it was you who abused me.... I meant in general terms from other moron posters..

Look I know what I know take it as u will but he is gone... Hence why the pies are rumoured to be after fev/ quiten lychn etc etc

We are in our window and need to replace our chf and maybe jolly.. No point doing it with 18 years olds too...

But u have two choices believe it or not... But from what I know he is off to the scum 100%

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:10 pm
by Deja Vu
TimetoFly wrote:
Deja Vu wrote:Well it can't be done and dusted as that would be in breach of AFL regulations wouldn't it?
Yeah cause ablett and scully wwas never done until the season was over :roll:
Before you roll your eyes at me would you care to provide anything other than conjecture and hearsay?

They may also have been signed during the period between the end of October and the November draft, and hence it was not against AFL regulations. This loophole has since been closed, but of course you knew that too didn't you?

:roll:

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:12 pm
by nulla
TimetoFly wrote:
Pa Marmo wrote:Time to fly, still waiting on the corroborating evidence on your Trav is gone claims, any chance of filling us all in?
I mentioned my source a few ago and I am not going to abused any longer.. So just wait and see shall we
Mate heated discussions arose in this thread between yourself and some who questioned the validity of your post/source.

You should withdraw your original post or be prepared to read comments made by others not in your favour.

When you look back over the years we have had Jonathan Brown coming for sure... Judd was signed sealed and delivered and I cannot remember a big fish coming our way after any such rumours..... In fact quite the opposite, the club seems to pull them out of thin air like Jolly for instance.

So it is any wonder there is an eruption when someone states they have inside info on a player especially a rumour that is started knowing full well the rumour will take a while to prove true or false

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:25 pm
by TimetoFly
Point taken nulla but as I said I stand 100% to the fact that the pies are losing Cloke to Carlton...

Been known now at the club for many weeks

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:27 pm
by TimetoFly
Deja Vu wrote:
TimetoFly wrote:
Deja Vu wrote:Well it can't be done and dusted as that would be in breach of AFL regulations wouldn't it?
Yeah cause ablett and scully wwas never done until the season was over :roll:
Before you roll your eyes at me would you care to provide anything other than conjecture and hearsay?

They may also have been signed during the period between the end of October and the November draft, and hence it was not against AFL regulations. This loophole has since been closed, but of course you knew that too didn't you?

:roll:
And buddy that's plain head in the sand stuff if unthink deals players managers dont talk and agree to terms during the season

Did u not see geelong travel to Adelaide to talk to boak?

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:31 pm
by watt price tully
nulla wrote:
TimetoFly wrote:
Pa Marmo wrote:Time to fly, still waiting on the corroborating evidence on your Trav is gone claims, any chance of filling us all in?
I mentioned my source a few ago and I am not going to abused any longer.. So just wait and see shall we
Mate heated discussions arose in this thread between yourself and some who questioned the validity of your post/source.

You should withdraw your original post or be prepared to read comments made by others not in your favour.

When you look back over the years we have had Jonathan Brown coming for sure... Judd was signed sealed and delivered and I cannot remember a big fish coming our way after any such rumours..... In fact quite the opposite, the club seems to pull them out of thin air like Jolly for instance.

So it is any wonder there is an eruption when someone states they have inside info on a player especially a rumour that is started knowing full well the rumour will take a while to prove true or false
You're being utterly reasonable & sensible.

How did you get on to Nicks?