Page 199 of 271

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 6:02 am
by DT56
Forget about Cloke .. let him go and sign up Fev

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 6:07 am
by Cuthbert Collingwood
^ No! and didn't someone say Fev has done a knee?

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 8:12 am
by Deja Vu
Ed let slip on MMM that he has seen the Blues offer for Travis, not sure if he was serious. Apparently 5 for 5.

According to the Hun Freo have upped their offer to 6 over 5.

We won't be matching either of those

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 8:49 am
by Piethagoras' Theorem
apparently Neeld was never interested...
MELBOURNE coach Mark Neeld says the Demons are content to build their forward line around Mitch Clark and have no interest in signing Collingwood key forward Travis Cloke.

Neeld said it was news to him that the Demons were ever in the race to sign Cloke.

"I don't feel comfortable talking about players from other clubs," Neeld said on Fox Footy's AFL Insider program on Tuesday night.

"I did read a couple of articles that apparently Melbourne were in [the chase] for Travis Cloke. That's not the case.

"There's been no offers from the Melbourne footy club to Travis and he's not coming here."
http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 9:02 am
by didick
Deja Vu wrote:Ed let slip on MMM that he has seen the Blues offer for Travis, not sure if he was serious. Apparently 5 for 5.

According to the Hun Freo have upped their offer to 6 over 5.

We won't be matching either of those
Supposedly we don't have to. I thought he just wanted 5 years at around $800k. If that's true just make it happen and let's move onward and upward.

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 9:21 am
by Deja Vu
didick wrote:
Deja Vu wrote:Ed let slip on MMM that he has seen the Blues offer for Travis, not sure if he was serious. Apparently 5 for 5.

According to the Hun Freo have upped their offer to 6 over 5.

We won't be matching either of those
Supposedly we don't have to. I thought he just wanted 5 years at around $800k. If that's true just make it happen and let's move onward and upward.
My hope is that Collingwood will budge on the 5th year eventually, but are reluctant to do it now because the Clokes will just come back and ask for more. If we match it right at the death knell it won't give them time to come back and ask for more.

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 9:25 am
by HAL
Whatever gave you that idea?

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 10:26 am
by Adz
He will go to Freo. That offer too good to refuse. I'd take it and I hate Perth.
In the words of Madonna Annodam, bye bye baby!

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 11:19 am
by ANNODAM
^ Aha, but she also has a song called STAY:


You saw through my lies and deception
Yeah I was losing my way
You, you gave my life some direction
And now I'm ready to say
I know there's bound to be some hard times ahead
I'd be a fool to believe
But if you go I'd rather think of dying instead
I never want you to leave

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 11:48 am
by Dave The Man
Freo Can Him the Big Dud

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 11:56 am
by woftam
Dave The Man wrote:Freo Can Him the Big Dud

Canning him before he has even arrived? That's a bit rich hey Dave? ;)

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 8:53 pm
by burnsy17
Bump.

Dont you dare try and slip to page two you inaccurate kicking, mark dropping million dollar spud! :)

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 9:03 pm
by ClokingDevice
Next years forwardline

D Thomas Dawes Goddard
Z Clarke Paine Krakouer

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 9:08 pm
by Pa Marmo
ClokingDevice wrote:Next years forwardline

D Thomas Dawes Goddard
Z Clarke Paine Krakouer
I prefer Didak. Cloke. Goldsack
Sinclair. Dawes. Paine.

I would rather use what we have every day.

Oh, and the only reason I left out Fasolo is I would play him on the wing as I think he will one day be a gun midfielder.

Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 9:14 pm
by Trezegol
ClokingDevice wrote:Next years forwardline

D Thomas Dawes Goddard
Z Clarke Paine Krakouer
The only way Zac Clarke will be at Colingwood is if Wellingham is traded to Freo. This is something that I'm prepared to do.