This is an unofficial Bulletin Board - owned and run by its users. We welcome all fans of the Mighty Collingwood Football Club.
https://nick.magpies.net/
Shoving him overPies4shaw wrote:I can't believe that sensible people think it was OK for Salem to take out his rage at being pantsed in the contest by throwing the ball at Ginnivan and then shoving him over. There's no call for it - pathetic little worm.
100% i cant believe people think its ok either, its not kinder, loose the temper tantrums!he had to pot shots! god knows how many ginnie has copped lately, and its got to stop, he has been singled out, players know they will get away with it,Pies4shaw wrote:I can't believe that sensible people think it was OK for Salem to take out his rage at being pantsed in the contest by throwing the ball at Ginnivan and then shoving him over. There's no call for it - pathetic little worm.
I wonder if the umpires and their advocate Eddiesmith practice this!What'sinaname wrote:The game is better viewing when both eyes are open.think positive wrote:wel you are allowed to be wrong
and you are!
lazzadesilva wrote:I wonder if the umpires and their advocate Eddiesmith practice this!What'sinaname wrote:The game is better viewing when both eyes are open.think positive wrote:wel you are allowed to be wrong
and you are!
I’d be worried what you’re teaching your kids if they went to ground with that little contact as it wouldn’t have knocked over an AuskickerMr Miyagi wrote:Lol Ginnivan did not dive, he was shoved to the ground and wasn’t expecting the contact because the ball was out of bounds. Free kick. Thank god my kids aren’t being umpired by eddiesmith in the little league
I think you have purposely or inadvertently misinterpreted what I said. I would absolutely hate every minute free paid but I wrote “genuine frees” on purpose dude. In just about every game, they miss major frees for both sides. With 3 Martians running the show, this is not acceptable in my view.eddiesmith wrote: It depends on how many free kicks you want paid a game? The general rule is the major and obvious, not every single technical free kick. Yesterdays tally is about what you’d expect in a final, 50-60 free kicks a game is too many generally.
The funny thing is people like to scream about this missed free kick and that missed free kick and 99% of them like Ginny’s dive are not what you want paid.
I had a game this year where my colleagues paid way too many free kicks and guess what? They were rightly criticised for it because no one really wants that.
Next game with the same team they were high praise for our umpiring when I was with 2 better umpires who also only paid the major and obvious, because that’s really what you want to see.
The Elliott free’s were 50/50 IMO, I’d be pissed if they were paid against us, which they normally are.Meredith1965 wrote:I thought the Ginnivan one probably was major and obvious, and such off the ball contact is usually paid, but overall, I thought we probably got the rub of the umpiring green yesterday. The Howe 50 was there (as was the one that should have been paid to Elliott) but several of the frees paid to Jamie’s for HTB were hair-trigger, especially given the proximity to goal.
Yeah, agree. The first one was there, because the defender shaped to handball and then chose not to, but the last two seemed too hot to me. The bloke playing the ball deserves the benefit of the doubt.Marvelos wrote:
The Elliott free’s were 50/50 IMO, I’d be pissed if they were paid against us, which they normally are.
Watch it again with your eyes open. HTB/incorrect disposal any day of the week. Billy deserved both free kicks.,Meredith1965 wrote:Yeah, agree. The first one was there, because the defender shaped to handball and then chose not to, but the last two seemed too hot to me. The bloke playing the ball deserves the benefit of the doubt.Marvelos wrote:
The Elliott free’s were 50/50 IMO, I’d be pissed if they were paid against us, which they normally are.
