Page 25 of 43
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2015 8:53 pm
by jackcass
The Boy Who Cried Wolf wrote:all of this may be true but really looking at our list now... do you give him any real hope of even getting a game??
He'll play more games in 2016 than all of us on Nicks put together.
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2015 9:24 pm
by Piethagoras' Theorem
It's up to others to take his position but he'll be as determined as ever. It can only be a good thing. Let's see what they've got!
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2015 10:04 pm
by The Boy Who Cried Wolf
jackcass wrote:The Boy Who Cried Wolf wrote:all of this may be true but really looking at our list now... do you give him any real hope of even getting a game??
He'll play more games in 2016 than all of us on Nicks put together.
lol... but not in our dreams (there are a few here who play a game in B&W every nite I'd dare say
)
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2015 10:09 am
by Member 7167
As the newer players develop Blair will potentially become more of a depth player. To suggest that this Premiership Player "Must Go" is ridiculous. Whilst he is far from the perfect player he gives of his best and plays his assigned role that is all you can ask of a player.
Give the guy a break and and show him the respect he deserves and has earned.
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2015 10:32 am
by think positive
Yep 100%
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2015 3:54 pm
by Lazza
Member 7167 wrote:As the newer players develop Blair will potentially become more of a depth player. To suggest that this Premiership Player "Must Go" is ridiculous. Whilst he is far from the perfect player he gives of his best and plays his assigned role that is all you can ask of a player.
Give the guy a break and and show him the respect he deserves and has earned.
Yep, this relentless bloody scapegoating of Blair is getting extremely tiresome and plainly stupid. I reckon Blair should continue to get a game as long as his form warrants inclusion. Let the others EARN their senior spots without them being given a game just on reputation alone. Lets first see how the new chums go in the practice matches, and to a lesser extent, in training before chucking the Blair baby out with the bathwater.....
As for this rediculous obsession of Nick's posters for scapegoating at least one Coillingwood player, can we give it a bloody rest in the off season FFS? It is just getting so boring and predictable this nit picking of a player wearing the black and white stripes. Like Dazaid in an earlier post, this bloke has played more games than any other sod posting here so give him a break...
As for this ridiculous obsession of Nick's posters for scapegoating at least one Collingwood player, can we give it a bloody rest, especially in the off season FFS? It is just getting so boring and predictable this feral like nit picking of a player wearing the black and white stripes. Like Daz said in an earlier post, this bloke has played more games than any other sod posting here so give him a break.
Otherwise nick off to the Richmond fan site and help them eat their own
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2015 9:19 pm
by Piesnchess
Lazza wrote:Member 7167 wrote:As the newer players develop Blair will potentially become more of a depth player. To suggest that this Premiership Player "Must Go" is ridiculous. Whilst he is far from the perfect player he gives of his best and plays his assigned role that is all you can ask of a player.
Give the guy a break and and show him the respect he deserves and has earned.
Yep, this relentless bloody scapegoating of Blair is getting extremely tiresome and plainly stupid. I reckon Blair should continue to get a game as long as his form warrants inclusion. Let the others EARN their senior spots without them being given a game just on reputation alone. Lets first see how the new chums go in the practice matches, and to a lesser extent, in training before chucking the Blair baby out with the bathwater.....
As for this rediculous obsession of Nick's posters for scapegoating at least one Coillingwood player, can we give it a bloody rest in the off season FFS? It is just getting so boring and predictable this nit picking of a player wearing the black and white stripes. Like Dazaid in an earlier post, this bloke has played more games than any other sod posting here so give him a break...
As for this ridiculous obsession of Nick's posters for scapegoating at least one Collingwood player, can we give it a bloody rest, especially in the off season FFS? It is just getting so boring and predictable this feral like nit picking of a player wearing the black and white stripes. Like Daz said in an earlier post, this bloke has played more games than any other sod posting here so give him a break.
Otherwise nick off to the Richmond fan site and help them eat their own
True bro Lazza, blair has played in a collingwood premiership team, and thats a pretty damn rare thing, at the best of times.
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2015 9:52 pm
by Wokko
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2015 3:00 am
by Cuthbert Collingwood
Piesnchess wrote:True bro Lazza, blair has played in a collingwood premiership team, and thats a pretty damn rare thing, at the best of times.
Which would make him one of 42 people to have done that in the lives of any of us born after 1958!!
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2015 3:18 am
by E
Cuthbert Collingwood wrote:Piesnchess wrote:True bro Lazza, blair has played in a collingwood premiership team, and thats a pretty damn rare thing, at the best of times.
Which would make him one of 42 people to have done that in the lives of any of us born after 1958!!
43 - don't forget our 2010 premiership team had 23 players (Goldsack/Davis only played in one half each)
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2015 5:01 am
by Cuthbert Collingwood
Ah crap, I knew I was wrong!
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2015 9:41 pm
by Piesnchess
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 8:33 pm
by thompsoc
3 weeks into the season and Blair has done F...ck all.
He is not alone in this.
But what is the point of playing him?
Forget about my dislike of him.
Every player has to bring something to the table not just crumbs.
In fact there seems to be a number of players from 2010 who are finished.
Blair, Goldy, Toovs, Caff.
Play some others please.
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 8:37 pm
by inxs88
C'MON John Wren where are you?? Surely his 11 possession, no tackles, no goals, no effect on the 90th game of his 115 deserves a spirited defence???
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 8:47 pm
by thompsoc
inxs88 wrote:C'MON John Wren where are you?? Surely his 11 possession, no tackles, no goals, no effect on the 90th game of his 115 deserves a spirited defence???
There is a lot of silence out there from a few posters.
What was it 2 tackles from our forward group.
I suppose the question is .. how the hell did we lose by only 29 points.
Bye Bye Blair... take the money and run!!!!