Dangerfield

All trade and draft talk here thanks..... this means you DTM!!!!

Moderator: bbmods

User avatar
roar
Posts: 4089
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 2:55 pm
Been liked: 3 times

Post by roar »

^ That's the way I see it, too, RW? Someone at the club even mentioned that they are keeping space for when we are closer to contending, ( and when there is someone worth getting perhaps).
kill for collingwood!
User avatar
RudeBoy
Posts: 22170
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:08 pm
Been liked: 148 times

Post by RudeBoy »

He has blood on his hands after knifing Sanderson behind his back.

He's a brilliant player, but I thought he came across as an arrogant prick last night on the footy show.

If he had any class about him he should have accepted responsibility for Sanderson's axing, by saying that the players feel bad for him because they let him down by not performing well enough this season. Rightly or wrongly, that would have been the honorable thing to say.

I hope the crows finish second from the bottom next year, ahead of Carlton.
User avatar
swoop42
Posts: 22050
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:27 pm
Location: The 18
Been liked: 8 times

Post by swoop42 »

RudeBoy wrote:He has blood on his hands after knifing Sanderson behind his back.

He's a brilliant player, but I thought he came across as an arrogant prick last night on the footy show.

If he had any class about him he should have accepted responsibility for Sanderson's axing, by saying that the players feel bad for him because they let him down by not performing well enough this season. Rightly or wrongly, that would have been the honorable thing to say.

I hope the crows finish second from the bottom next year, ahead of Carlton.
To be honest I have to agree with you.

I wasn't convinced by his performance on the footy show.

And while we are on the footy show how could they not ask him the most basic question that needed answering the most which was do you agree that he needed to be sacked?

We never got a straight answer from Dangerfield (or the appropriate question to incite the response) on the question that needed to be asked the most.
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
User avatar
jackcass
Posts: 12529
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Bendigo

Post by jackcass »

swoop42 wrote:
RudeBoy wrote:He has blood on his hands after knifing Sanderson behind his back.

He's a brilliant player, but I thought he came across as an arrogant prick last night on the footy show.

If he had any class about him he should have accepted responsibility for Sanderson's axing, by saying that the players feel bad for him because they let him down by not performing well enough this season. Rightly or wrongly, that would have been the honorable thing to say.

I hope the crows finish second from the bottom next year, ahead of Carlton.
To be honest I have to agree with you.

I wasn't convinced by his performance on the footy show.

And while we are on the footy show how could they not ask him the most basic question that needed answering the most which was do you agree that he needed to be sacked?

We never got a straight answer from Dangerfield (or the appropriate question to incite the response) on the question that needed to be asked the most.
Think it'll get lots of coverage this weekend across the media, it and the Essendon saga will sadly drag attention away from what should be a sensational weekend of footy, well as good as it can be without the Pies playing anyway.
Post Reply